The Kosher Gourmet by Megan Gordon With its colorful cache of purples and oranges and reds, COLLARD GREEN SLAW is a marvelous mood booster --- not to mention just downright delish
April 18, 2014
Rabbi Yonason Goldson: Clarifying one of the greatest philosophical conundrums in theology
The Kosher Gourmet by Julie Rothman Almondy, flourless torta del re (Italian king's cake), has royal roots, is simple to make, . . . but devour it because it's simply delicious
: Trying hard to be 'positive' but never succeeding? Blame Your Brain
April 14, 2014
Rabbi Dr Naftali Brawer: Passover frees us from the tyranny of time
: First degree: How America really recovered from a murder epidemic
: When love is not enough: Teaching your kids about the realities of adult relationships
: How you can tell if your financial adviser is setting you up for potential ruin
: Up to 500,000 people die each year from hepatitis C-related liver disease. New Treatment Has Over 90% Success Rate
: Eating Watermelon Can Help Control High Blood Pressure
April 11, 2014
Rabbi Hillel Goldberg: Silence is much more than golden
: How to value a child for who he is, not just what he does
: A Simple Blood Test Might Soon Diagnose Cancer
: Have A Slow Metabolism? Let Science Speed It Up For You
April 9, 2014
Jonathan Tobin: Why Did Kerry Lie About Israeli Blame?
Samuel G. Freedman
: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau
: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau
: How Beans, Peas, And Chickpeas Cleanse Bad Cholesterol and Lowers Risk of Heart Disease
April 8, 2014
Coffee Drinkers Rejoice! Your Cup Of Joe Can Prevent Death From Liver Disease
Electric 'Thinking Cap' Puts Your Brain Power Into High Gear
April 4, 2014
A life of love: How to build lasting relationships with your children
Older Women: Save Your Heart, Prevent Stroke Don't Drink Diet
Why 50 million Americans will still have spring allergies after taking meds
Teacher keeps promise to mail thousands of former students letters written by their past selves
April 2, 2014
Should South Carolina Jews be forced to maintain this chimney built by Germans serving the Nazis?
Get happy: 20 scientifically proven happiness activities
It's Genetic! Obesity and the 'Carb Breakdown' Gene
Jewish World Review
Sept. 7, 2006
/ 14 Elul 5766
History judges good presidents by what they do, bad ones by how long they take to
undo. Although history hasn't yet caught up with President George W. Bush, midterm
elections are about to-and those are often a referendum on presidential performance.
Now is therefore as good a time as any to jump to a conclusion: the question history
will ask is whether Bush's presidency was as bad as Richard Nixon's or only as bad
as Jimmy Carter's.
Five years ago, with the ruins of the Twin Towers still smoking, many Americans-I
should own that I was one of them-looked at Bush and thought they saw a Churchill,
or at least a Truman: a leader fortuitously equipped for a difficult job at a
critical moment. Bush's partisans are still holding out for misunderestimated
greatness, to be vindicated in the end. They think Bush will be to the war on
jihadism what Truman was to the Cold War: the guy who established the course that
will see the country through decades of peril.
To those disinclined to suspend judgment for fifty years, however, Bush's course is
looking less like a long road than a dead end. Even many conservatives have lost
faith; in a recent interview with CBS News, no less a conservative luminary than
William F. Buckley declared, "There will be no legacy for Mr. Bush." For the
disenchanted-again, including me-the relevant points of reference now are not
Churchill or Truman but Nixon and Carter.
One of the best ways to judge a president is to ask, Did he solve more problems than
he created? This test is more severe than it may seem, because presidents are prone
to mischief and grandiosity. With Presidents Reagan, Bush Senior, and Clinton, the
country had a good run. Reagan curtailed inflation and rebuilt U.S. strength; Bush
broke the back of the deficit and closed out the Cold War peacefully; Clinton
finished the fiscal cleanup and managed to assert U.S. supremacy while enhancing
U.S. popularity. All made mistakes, but they got more right than wrong. Nixon and
Carter, on the other hand, both did some good things (Nixon went to China, Carter
deregulated transportation); but both, in the end, turned in negative balance
Carter's weak leadership drained American confidence and prestige, and his clumsy
regulation of energy markets and dithering on inflation damaged the economy. Reagan,
however, moved briskly to restore confidence, decontrol energy, and support the
monetary tightening that subdued inflation. By the end of Reagan's first term,
Carter's mistakes were memories. Carter took only a few years to undo, which made
him more a downer than a disaster.
Nixon was a disaster. Unwinding him took decades, not years. It was Nixon whose
cynical pump priming and absurd wage and price controls ignited double-digit
inflation and bequeathed it to three succeeding presidents, with aftershocks (for
instance, the savings and loan crisis) that lasted into the George H. W. Bush years.
It was Nixon whose fiscal policies-cutting defense unsustainably while expanding
entitlement programs-caused the deficit crisis that would torment every president
through Clinton. Watergate and the administration's mendacious handling of Vietnam
undermined confidence in government for a generation. Nixon's mistakes-and there
were others-were gifts that kept on giving.
As for the current president, Buckley isn't quite right. Bush will leave a legacy,
in the form of four headaches.
The fiscal mess. Bush's tax cuts and spending increases turned a $236 billion
federal surplus in fiscal 2000 into a deficit of more than $400 billion four years
later, an astonishing reversal. That the current year's deficit may come in at
something like $300 billion is little cause for comfort; with Baby Boomers due to
retire and an expensive Medicare drug benefit kicking in, the country's fiscal
position is weak.
The Iraq mess. The invasion was a gamble; the failure to scrub the prewar
intelligence and properly manage the postwar occupation were mistakes. The gamble
might still pay off, but the mistakes have astronomically raised the gamble's cost
in lives, money, prestige, and U.S. strategic focus and position (Iran has been the
invasion's signal beneficiary).
International opprobrium. The Iraq adventure fueled a precipitous decline in
America's image abroad, and Bush's pugnacious style during his first term and his
tin ear for foreign opinion made a bad situation worse. This is more than just a
public-relations problem. National prestige is diplomatic capital; the more
unpopular America becomes, the higher the price of foreign support. Mark Malloch
Brown, the UN's deputy secretary-general, recently said that suspicion of the United
States has grown to the point where "many otherwise quite moderate countries" are
inclined to oppose anything we favor.
An extralegal terrorism war. If the country seriously intends to prevent terrorism,
then spying at home, detaining terror suspects, and conducting tough interrogations
are practices that the government will need to engage in for many years to come.
Instead of making proper legal provisions for those practices, Bush has run the war
against jihadism out of his back pocket, as a permanent state of emergency. He
engages in legal ad-hockery and trickery, treats Congress as a nuisance rather than
a partner, and circumvents outmoded laws and treaties when he should be creating new
ones. Of all Bush's failings, his refusal to build durable underpinnings for what
promises to be a long struggle is the most surprising, the most gratuitous, and
potentially the most damaging, both to the sustainability of the antiterrorism
effort and to the constitutional order.
How long will unwinding Bush take? Because of demographic headwinds, balancing the
budget looks like a long-term project, requiring a decade if things go well, two or
three decades (or forever) if not. Some of today's anti-Americanism, by contrast,
may be anti-Bushism that will prove quick to dissipate. The Iraq situation could tip
one way or the other, but Bush himself has acknowledged that the disposition of U.S.
forces in Iraq "will be decided by future presidents" (note the plural). In
principle, a domestic legal framework for the war on jihadism could be constructed
in several years by a determined president and Congress (new treaty arrangements,
such as a much-needed update of the Geneva Conventions, would take longer); or, much
less desirably, the courts might wind up piecing together a ramshackle framework
over a decade or more.
All in all, a reasonable guess is that unwinding Bush will take more than a decade
but less than two, meaning the job will be harder than unwinding Carter but easier
than unwinding Nixon. In doing it, however, Bush's successors will have one useful
ally: Bush himself. Albeit grudgingly, he has begun working with Congress on
terrorism-war legislation; in the realm of foreign policy, as former UN Ambassador
Richard Holbrooke noted recently in Foreign Affairs, "George W. Bush's second
administration has made a serious, and partially successful, effort to undo some of
the damage the first Bush team caused." (Carter also tried to be a self-unwinder,
changing course on détente and fiscal policy, but he ran out of time. Part of FDR's
genius was that he unwound himself at least twice.)
Bush has two years left to unwind himself; and if he's lucky, he'll have a
Democratic House or Senate to help. He has been cursed with a Republican Congress
that has indulged his worst tendencies-but that problem, at least, the voters might
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan Rauch is a senior writer and columnist for National Journal. Comment by clicking here.
Jonathan Rauch Archives
© 2006, Jonathan Rauch