
 |
|
Oct. 10, 2008
Rabbi Abraham J. Twerski: The limitations of scientific miracles
Caroline B. Glick:
Lebanon on the brink --- and why it matters
Oct. 8, 2008
Rabbi Berel Wein: The day when the sane talk to themselves
Ana Veciana-Suarez: Many nonobservant Jews are finding religion
Oct. 7, 2008
Gary Rosenblatt: Of politics and prayer
Caroline B. Glick: The ironies of the West's collusion with the Arabs and Iran
Oct. 6, 2008
Rabbi Yitzchok R. Rubin: Mamma to the masses
Jonathan Tobin: Ahmadinejad Isn't Too Impressed
Oct. 3, 2008
Rabbi A. Henach Leibowitz: The 'living dead' are all around us
Caroline B. Glick:
Olmert's parting blows
Oct. 2, 2008
The Jewish Ethicist
by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Q: Often customers looking for our competitor accidentally enter our store. Can we just serve them without comment?
Jonathan Tobin: Jewish pundit quiz on next year's news
Sept. 29, 2008
Rabbi Eli Gewirtz: Lehman Brothers and the Day of Judgment
Rabbi Leiby Burnham: Apples, Honey and You
Sept. 26, 2008
Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The shofar and the Echo of Sinai
Caroline B. Glick: A road paved on reality
Sept. 24, 2008
Greg Crosby: Home for the Holy Days
Ethel G. Hofman: Rosh Hashanah Favorites: Old-fashioned taste, reduced calories
Sept. 23, 2008
Caroline Glick: Liberalism or lives!?
Michael Ledeen: Dear President Ahmadinejad
Sept. 22, 2008
The Jewish Ethicist
by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Q: I gave a check to a local merchant, but it hasn't been cashed in months. Probably they lost it. Do I have to tell them?
Diana West: We are losing Europe to Islam
Sept. 19, 2008
Rabbi Berel Wein: On harvesting success
Caroline B. Glick: It is time to act
Sept. 18, 2008
Rabbi Hillel Goldberg: Is camping the panacea to save Jewry from self-destruction?
Craig Gordon: Was SNL hilarity too much for Hillary?
Sept. 17, 2008
Jonathan Tobin: The Whole World Is Watching
The Kosher Gourmet
By Linda Gassenheimer: East meets Southwest in this quick meal: MEXICAN-ASIAN TOSTADOS
Sept. 16, 2008
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. : Into the fire
Everything's Relative : Your Official Jewish Guide to the 2008 USA Presidential Election
Sept. 15, 2008
The Jewish Ethicist
by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Enabling risky behavior
Diana West:
A day that will live in ... accommodating Islam
Sept. 11, 2008
Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The skeleton in my closet
Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein: Persecution and systematic destruction of Christians in the Middle East must be stopped
Sept. 10, 2008
Jonathan Tobin: There's Something About Sarah
The Kosher Gourmet by Kathy Manweiler: Who needs Chili's when you have these? Recipes for Mexican that taste great and are dietetic!
Our commitment to freedom
Sept. 9, 2008
Daniel Pipes: Must counterinsurgency wars fail?
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.:
Sept. 8, 2008
The Jewish Ethicist
by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: How far must one go to help somebody out of a contract?
Barry Rubin: Waiting For Something
Sept. 8, 2008
The Jewish Ethicist
by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir : How far must one go to help somebody out of a contract?
Barry Rubin: Waiting For Something
March 22, 2007
J-Rhythms with Avraham Rosenblum: JWR's cutting-edge music program showcasing performers -- singers, song writers, musicians, and bands -- who learn and live the Torah lifestyle (OUR NEWEST IGODCAST !)
Oct. 29, 2003
Mortimer B. Zuckerman: Graffiti On History's Walls (MUST-READ!)
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Nov. 1, 2007
/ 20 Mar-Cheshvan 5768
Nobel Prize in Economics where Team USA still dominates the game
By
Jonathan V. Last
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Remember the Cold War era, when people obsessed over the medal count during the Olympics? We loved watching plucky American amateurs clobbering the mechanical, godless Reds, every one of them - even their little teenage gymnasts - looming like Ivan Drago.
Alas, the Olympics have lost some of their luster after the fall of communism. Gone is the thrill of nationalist rah-rah. It's our Nike-endorsing, semiprofessional athletes against everyone else's Nike-endorsing, semiprofessional athletes, and basically, we're all friends now. Boring.
Everyone needs to get his jingoistic kicks somewhere, though. I get mine from the Nobel Prize awards. America has never fared particularly well in the Peace or Literature events, taking home only 20 medals in the former and a disgraceful 12 medals in the latter. Since the 1930s, we've done well in Medicine and have been quite strong in both Chemistry (42 medals) and Physics (53).
But it's the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences - more commonly known as the Nobel Prize in Economics - where we dominate. We're the New York Yankees of economic theory, having won or shared the prize in 29 of the 39 years it's been given. If a snooty European ever tries badgering you about climate change, or the state of Team USA basketball, or Iraq, just say, "Yeah? Well, we own the Sveriges Riksbank Prize." That's how you end an argument.
Recently, like any fan, I was sitting at home covered in red, white and blue body paint, just waiting for the announcement of this year's award. I was pretty juiced when the committee gave it to Leonid Hurwicz, Eric S. Maskin and Roger B. Myerson, because in addition to the normal welling of national pride, Hurwicz, Maskin and Myerson are pioneers in a particularly interesting branch of economics: mechanism-design theory.
Mechanism-design theory is an offshoot of the more popular field of game theory. When you hear the words game theory, you probably think of Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly from the movie "A Beautiful Mind," which was supposedly about John Nash, the father of game theory. (And yet another American Nobel winner, for those of you keeping score at home.)
Heavy on the romance and melodrama, "A Beautiful Mind" was light on the basics of game theory, which boil down to this: An economic "game" is one where actors make decisions by seeking to maximize the outcomes of situations that depend, in some part, on the decisions made by other actors, who are also seeking to maximize their outcomes. The classic "prisoner's dilemma," for instance, is a situation ripe for the application of game theory.
Mechanism-design theory accepts the ground rules of game theory, but concentrates on finding sets of rules that can help actors maximize outcomes. Consider the following example:
Andy owns a widget and is considering selling it. Donovan would like to buy a widget. That widget carries a specific, but probably different, dollar value for each man. Andy won't sell the widget unless Donovan's value is higher than his. And - here's where the game theory comes in - neither man will tell the other truthfully what his valuation of the widget is. That's because if Andy is honest, Donovan can offer him just $1 more, even if his valuation is much higher; conversely, if Donovan is honest, Andy could accept that amount, even if his valuation is much lower. So we have a conundrum.
It's a general economic principle that private information - that is, stuff you know that other actors don't - is a huge source of inefficiency. Andy and Donovan each have private information about how they value the widget, and although they may be able to haggle out a price, it may not be the optimal price that creates the most net value.
Which is where mechanism-design theory comes in. Using the principles of mechanism-design theory, an economist could study Andy, Donovan and the widget and figure out a method of sale that could get the best deal for both of them. That might entail the use of a Dutch auction (start high and come down until someone bids, or until you hit the seller's minimum acceptable price), or an English auction (start with the lowest acceptable price and work bidders off against one another to jack it up). It might even call for a double-auction, where each party announces its bid/ask price, with the widget to be sold at the point halfway between the two.
Even in this streamlined example, you can see where mechanism-design theory exists all around us as people create systems to help buyers and sellers come together. One of the great mechanism designs of recent years has been iTunes, a system that helped overcome the "private information" at the heart of the music industry: namely, what the songs in the middle of a CD (which were always the hardest to get to hear) sound like and how much an individual values a given piece of music. Unbundling collections of songs and offering them at a uniform, fixed price is an elegant mechanism.
So three cheers for America's latest stud economists. Dismal science? Only for the rest of the world.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jonathan V. Last is a columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer. Comment by clicking here.
Previously:
10/25/07 Handicapping the GOP's presidential horse race
10/11/07 Germany's Turks provide a lesson on immigration
09/13/07 British battle can offer us a perspective on casualties
09/12/07 Alas, GOP seems set to take hit in Senate
08/30/07 Europeans have supplanted backbones with capitulation
08/24/07 Politics holds the key to ensuring a healthy growth in population
08/17/07 Finessing the Democratic center
08/10/07 Woohoo! Satire seeing a revival
07/31/07 Historical model: For Obama, it's Carter
07/26/07 Baseball, apple pie, a 2nd chance
07/24/07 Harry Potter and the alchemy theory
07/06/07 Life is hard and often short. The perils of professional wrestling
06/21/07 After Bush: Gingrich and others worry that his shortcomings could have a far-reaching effect on the GOP
03/09/07 Why the British outclass us in acting
01/23/07 Romney: Seriously great, but with baggage
12/23/06 When truth is transpicuous
12/05/06 A realistic plan: Split the country in two
11/08/06 We could easily pull out of Korea and let China have regional hegemony. But would it be the right thing?
10/24/06 The decline of revolution
10/18/06 Why the free market is king
08/07/06 Democracy, of itself, not solution to all problems
08/01/06 We get the movies we deserve
07/27/06 How long will U.S. empire last?
© 2006, The Philadelphia Inquirer. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
|
|

Mitch Albom
Michael Barone
Dave Barry
Tony Blankley
Andy Borowitz
David Broder
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Rod Dreher
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
John Fund
Frank J. Gaffney
Lloyd Garver
Jonah Goldberg
Michael Goodwin
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Laura Ingraham
Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
James Klurfeld
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Jonathan Last
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
The Medicine Men
Dick Morris
Bill O'Reilly
Clarence Page
Kathleen Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Jonathan Rauch
Celia Rivenbark
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Culture Shlock
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Jonathan Tobin
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
Gary Brookins
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holber
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Ranan R. Lurie
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Jeff Stahler
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

How 2
Know-It-All
Lori Borgman
The Savvy Consumer
Elder matters
Fixit
Dr. Peter Gott
Marybeth Hicks
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Tech Maven
Nutrition Myths
Bruce Williams
How Stuff Works
|