Home
In this issue

Oct. 10, 2008

Rabbi Abraham J. Twerski: The limitations of scientific miracles

Caroline B. Glick: Lebanon on the brink --- and why it matters

Oct. 8, 2008

Rabbi Berel Wein: The day when the sane talk to themselves

Ana Veciana-Suarez: Many nonobservant Jews are finding religion

Oct. 7, 2008

Gary Rosenblatt: Of politics and prayer

Caroline B. Glick: The ironies of the West's collusion with the Arabs and Iran

Oct. 6, 2008

Rabbi Yitzchok R. Rubin: Mamma to the masses

Jonathan Tobin: Ahmadinejad Isn't Too Impressed

Oct. 3, 2008

Rabbi A. Henach Leibowitz: The 'living dead' are all around us

Caroline B. Glick: Olmert's parting blows

Oct. 2, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Q: Often customers looking for our competitor accidentally enter our store. Can we just serve them without comment?

Jonathan Tobin: Jewish pundit quiz on next year's news

Sept. 29, 2008

Rabbi Eli Gewirtz: Lehman Brothers and the Day of Judgment

Rabbi Leiby Burnham: Apples, Honey and You

Sept. 26, 2008

Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The shofar and the Echo of Sinai

Caroline B. Glick: A road paved on reality

Sept. 24, 2008

Greg Crosby: Home for the Holy Days

Ethel G. Hofman: Rosh Hashanah Favorites: Old-fashioned taste, reduced calories

Sept. 23, 2008

Caroline Glick: Liberalism or lives!?

Michael Ledeen: Dear President Ahmadinejad

Sept. 22, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Q: I gave a check to a local merchant, but it hasn't been cashed in months. Probably they lost it. Do I have to tell them?

Diana West: We are losing Europe to Islam

Sept. 19, 2008

Rabbi Berel Wein: On harvesting success

Caroline B. Glick: It is time to act

Sept. 18, 2008

Rabbi Hillel Goldberg: Is camping the panacea to save Jewry from self-destruction?

Craig Gordon: Was SNL hilarity too much for Hillary?

Sept. 17, 2008

Jonathan Tobin: The Whole World Is Watching

The Kosher Gourmet By Linda Gassenheimer: East meets Southwest in this quick meal: MEXICAN-ASIAN TOSTADOS

Sept. 16, 2008

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. : Into the fire

Everything's Relative : Your Official Jewish Guide to the 2008 USA Presidential Election

Sept. 15, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Enabling risky behavior

Diana West: A day that will live in ... accommodating Islam

Sept. 11, 2008

Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The skeleton in my closet

Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein: Persecution and systematic destruction of Christians in the Middle East must be stopped

Sept. 10, 2008

Jonathan Tobin: There's Something About Sarah

The Kosher Gourmet by Kathy Manweiler: Who needs Chili's when you have these? Recipes for Mexican that taste great and are dietetic! Our commitment to freedom

Sept. 9, 2008

Daniel Pipes: Must counterinsurgency wars fail?

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.:

Sept. 8, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: How far must one go to help somebody out of a contract?

Barry Rubin: Waiting For Something

Sept. 8, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir : How far must one go to help somebody out of a contract?

Barry Rubin: Waiting For Something

March 22, 2007

J-Rhythms with Avraham Rosenblum: JWR's cutting-edge music program showcasing performers -- singers, song writers, musicians, and bands -- who learn and live the Torah lifestyle (OUR NEWEST IGODCAST !)

Oct. 29, 2003
Mortimer B. Zuckerman: Graffiti On History's Walls (MUST-READ!)

Jewish World Review Nov. 1, 2007 / 20 Mar-Cheshvan 5768

Nobel Prize in Economics — where Team USA still dominates the game

By Jonathan V. Last


Printer Friendly Version
Email this article

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Remember the Cold War era, when people obsessed over the medal count during the Olympics? We loved watching plucky American amateurs clobbering the mechanical, godless Reds, every one of them - even their little teenage gymnasts - looming like Ivan Drago.

Alas, the Olympics have lost some of their luster after the fall of communism. Gone is the thrill of nationalist rah-rah. It's our Nike-endorsing, semiprofessional athletes against everyone else's Nike-endorsing, semiprofessional athletes, and basically, we're all friends now. Boring.

Everyone needs to get his jingoistic kicks somewhere, though. I get mine from the Nobel Prize awards. America has never fared particularly well in the Peace or Literature events, taking home only 20 medals in the former and a disgraceful 12 medals in the latter. Since the 1930s, we've done well in Medicine and have been quite strong in both Chemistry (42 medals) and Physics (53).

But it's the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences - more commonly known as the Nobel Prize in Economics - where we dominate. We're the New York Yankees of economic theory, having won or shared the prize in 29 of the 39 years it's been given. If a snooty European ever tries badgering you about climate change, or the state of Team USA basketball, or Iraq, just say, "Yeah? Well, we own the Sveriges Riksbank Prize." That's how you end an argument.

Recently, like any fan, I was sitting at home covered in red, white and blue body paint, just waiting for the announcement of this year's award. I was pretty juiced when the committee gave it to Leonid Hurwicz, Eric S. Maskin and Roger B. Myerson, because in addition to the normal welling of national pride, Hurwicz, Maskin and Myerson are pioneers in a particularly interesting branch of economics: mechanism-design theory.

Mechanism-design theory is an offshoot of the more popular field of game theory. When you hear the words game theory, you probably think of Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly from the movie "A Beautiful Mind," which was supposedly about John Nash, the father of game theory. (And yet another American Nobel winner, for those of you keeping score at home.)

Heavy on the romance and melodrama, "A Beautiful Mind" was light on the basics of game theory, which boil down to this: An economic "game" is one where actors make decisions by seeking to maximize the outcomes of situations that depend, in some part, on the decisions made by other actors, who are also seeking to maximize their outcomes. The classic "prisoner's dilemma," for instance, is a situation ripe for the application of game theory.

Mechanism-design theory accepts the ground rules of game theory, but concentrates on finding sets of rules that can help actors maximize outcomes. Consider the following example:

Andy owns a widget and is considering selling it. Donovan would like to buy a widget. That widget carries a specific, but probably different, dollar value for each man. Andy won't sell the widget unless Donovan's value is higher than his. And - here's where the game theory comes in - neither man will tell the other truthfully what his valuation of the widget is. That's because if Andy is honest, Donovan can offer him just $1 more, even if his valuation is much higher; conversely, if Donovan is honest, Andy could accept that amount, even if his valuation is much lower. So we have a conundrum.

It's a general economic principle that private information - that is, stuff you know that other actors don't - is a huge source of inefficiency. Andy and Donovan each have private information about how they value the widget, and although they may be able to haggle out a price, it may not be the optimal price that creates the most net value.

Which is where mechanism-design theory comes in. Using the principles of mechanism-design theory, an economist could study Andy, Donovan and the widget and figure out a method of sale that could get the best deal for both of them. That might entail the use of a Dutch auction (start high and come down until someone bids, or until you hit the seller's minimum acceptable price), or an English auction (start with the lowest acceptable price and work bidders off against one another to jack it up). It might even call for a double-auction, where each party announces its bid/ask price, with the widget to be sold at the point halfway between the two.

Even in this streamlined example, you can see where mechanism-design theory exists all around us as people create systems to help buyers and sellers come together. One of the great mechanism designs of recent years has been iTunes, a system that helped overcome the "private information" at the heart of the music industry: namely, what the songs in the middle of a CD (which were always the hardest to get to hear) sound like and how much an individual values a given piece of music. Unbundling collections of songs and offering them at a uniform, fixed price is an elegant mechanism.

So three cheers for America's latest stud economists. Dismal science? Only for the rest of the world.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Jonathan V. Last is a columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer. Comment by clicking here.


Previously:

10/25/07 Handicapping the GOP's presidential horse race
10/11/07 Germany's Turks provide a lesson on immigration
09/13/07 British battle can offer us a perspective on casualties
09/12/07 Alas, GOP seems set to take hit in Senate
08/30/07 Europeans have supplanted backbones with capitulation
08/24/07 Politics holds the key to ensuring a healthy growth in population
08/17/07 Finessing the Democratic center
08/10/07 Woohoo! Satire seeing a revival
07/31/07 Historical model: For Obama, it's Carter
07/26/07 Baseball, apple pie, a 2nd chance
07/24/07 Harry Potter and the alchemy theory
07/06/07 Life is hard — and often short. The perils of professional wrestling
06/21/07 After Bush: Gingrich and others worry that his shortcomings could have a far-reaching effect on the GOP
03/09/07 Why the British outclass us in acting
01/23/07 Romney: Seriously great, but with baggage
12/23/06 When truth is transpicuous
12/05/06 A realistic plan: Split the country in two
11/08/06 We could easily pull out of Korea and let China have regional hegemony. But would it be the right thing?
10/24/06 The decline of revolution
10/18/06 Why the free market is king
08/07/06 Democracy, of itself, not solution to all problems
08/01/06 We get the movies we deserve
07/27/06 How long will U.S. empire last?


© 2006, The Philadelphia Inquirer. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Insight (Our Columnists)

 Mitch Albom
 Michael Barone
  Dave Barry
 Tony Blankley
 Andy Borowitz
 David Broder
 Stratfor Briefing
 Mona Charen
 Linda Chavez
 Ann Coulter
 Greg Crosby
 Rod Dreher
 Larry Elder
 Suzanne Fields
 John Fund
 Frank J. Gaffney
 Lloyd Garver
 Jonah Goldberg
 Michael Goodwin
 Julia Gorin
 Jonathan Gurwitz
 Paul Greenberg
 Victor Davis Hanson
 Betsy Hart
 Nat Hentoff
 David Horowitz
 Laura Ingraham
 Jeff Jacoby
 Paul Johnson
 Jack Kelly
 James Klurfeld
 Ed Koch
 Ch. Krauthammer
 Jonathan Last
 Michael Ledeen
 John Leo
 David Limbaugh
 Kathryn Lopez
 Rich Lowry
 Michelle Malkin
 Jackie Mason
 The Medicine Men
 Dick Morris
 Bill O'Reilly
 Clarence Page
 Kathleen Parker
 Dennis Prager
 Wesley Pruden
 Tom Purcell
 Jonathan Rauch
 Celia Rivenbark
 Robert Robb
 Cokie & Steve Roberts
 Pat Sajak
 Debra J. Saunders
 Culture Shlock
 Roger Simon
 Michael Smerconish
 Thomas Sowell
 Mark Steyn
 John Stossel
 Cal Thomas
 Jonathan Tobin
 Bob Tyrrell
 Diana West
 Dave Weinbaum
 George Will
 Walter Williams
 Mort Zuckerman

'Toons
 Robert Arial
 Chuck Asay
 Chip Bok
 Dry Bones
  Lisa Benson
 John Branch
 Gary Brookins
 John Cole
 J. D. Crowe
 John Deering
 Brian Duffy
 Everything's Relative
 Mallard Fillmore
 Jake Fuller
 Bob Gorrel
 Joe Heller
 David Hitch
 Jerry Holber
 Steve Kelley
 Jeff Koterba
 Dick Locher
 Chan Lowe
 Ranan R. Lurie
 Jimmy Margulies
 Rick McKee
 Michael Ramirez
 Jeff Stahler
 Danna Summers
 John Trever
 Gary Varvel
 Kirk Walters

Lifestyles
 How 2
 Know-It-All
 Lori Borgman
 The Savvy Consumer
 Elder matters
 Fixit
 Dr. Peter Gott
 Marybeth Hicks
 GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
 Richard Lederer
 Tech Maven
 Nutrition Myths
 Bruce Williams
 How Stuff Works