May 24, 2013
May 22, 2013
They launched the 'Arab Spring' but now yearn for the good old days of a strongman
May 20, 2013
Richard A. Serrano: Is Meir Kahane's assassin now a changed man?
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
Nov. 19, 2007
/ 9 Kislev 5768
Dems suffer Dukakis moment
Sometimes the public measure of presidential mettle comes down to a single image: Richard Nixon sweating through a debate with John F. Kennedy; Jimmy Carter fending off a killer swamp rabbit; or Michael Dukakis posing in an M1 Abrams battle tank.
Will Hillary Clinton's dissembling over drivers' licenses for illegal immigrants turn out to be her Dukakis-in-a-tank moment? If so, then it will be manifestly unfair but not because the senator from New York is striving to be the first chief executive whose spouse would be a first gentleman.
What was unfair was that Clinton was the first to field a question from Tim Russert at the Democratic presidential debate in Philadelphia on Oct. 30 about New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's controversial plan. In her answer, she seemed to confirm what she had told the Nashua Telegraph's editorial board Oct. 16. Giving illegal immigrants licenses "makes a lot of sense" because it helps fill the vacuum left by the federal government's failure to enact comprehensive immigration reform.
But then Clinton went Clintonian. In response to criticism from Sen. Chris Dodd, she stated, "I did not say that it should be done, but I certainly recognize why Gov. Spitzer is trying to do it."
Answering Dodd's charge a repeat of her quote to the newspaper, really that she said it made sense, she replied, "No I didn't." Then answering Russert again about the plan's sensibility, she said, "It makes a lot of sense," though it's not necessarily "the best thing for any governor to do."
In the space of three minutes, she covered at least three positions on a simple yes or no question. Three weeks later, following a furor over her dissimulation, the voting public finally learned she's against drivers' licenses for illegal immigrants for the time being.
Here's the unfair part. Russert then put the question to all seven candidates for the Democratic nomination who participated in the debate at Drexel University: "Does anyone here believe that an illegal immigrant should not have a driver's license?"
The six men surrounding Clinton looked about sheepishly. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Omicron Persei 8, asked for clarification. Only Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut raised his hand in mild dissent.
Driving is a privilege, Dodd said. Extending licenses to illegal immigrants is "troublesome," as though anyone who flouts our nation's immigration laws would somehow be deterred from getting behind the wheel because the Department of Motor Vehicles says they aren't privileged enough.
The real story from the Drexel debate should have been that six Democratic presidential hopefuls see nothing wrong with licensing illegal immigrants. Or at least, as in the case of Clinton, they see it as the not-best thing that sometimes makes a lot of sense.
Over the past year, conventional wisdom has held that the immigration issue is toxic for Republicans. And there's no doubt that some of the corrosive rhetoric in the immigration debate has destroyed GOP support among Hispanics that Republicans have struggled for three decades to build.
But the Republican problem, serious as it is, is largely one of style of using the right language and framing the debate properly. The American people are frustrated by the government's failure to enforce immigration laws, a failure that, as the 9-11 commission detailed in a 2004 monograph, terrorists have devastatingly exploited. They want current immigration laws enforced, not new laws that reward immigration scofflaws.
For Democrats, however, the immigration issue presents a problem of substance. A Rasmussen poll conducted in the wake of the Drexel debate found that 77 percent of Americans oppose granting drivers' licenses to illegal immigrants, including 68 percent of those who identified themselves as Democrats. Facing withering opposition, Spitzer withdrew the plan last week.
So when six Democratic candidates stuff their hands in their pockets when given the opportunity to signal their opposition to this policy, it's a sign of just how out of touch they are with public sentiment. And that image, more than a bumbling Hillary Clinton, is the one that should have emerged from Philadelphia.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment by clicking here.
JWR contributor Jonathan Gurwitz, a columnist for the San Antonio Express-News, is a co-founder and twice served as Director General of the Future Leaders of the Alliance program at NATO Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. In 1986 he was placed on the Foreign Service Register of the U.S. State Department.
Jonathan Gurwitz Archives
© 2007, Jonathan Gurwitz
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K