May 20, 2013
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
Feb. 8, 2006
/ 10 Shevat, 5766
GOP tosses one to Dems, and they fumble
Major political realignments are exceedingly rare occurrences in the United States. Before Republicans took control of Congress in 1994, you have to go all the way back to 1932 to find a similar partisan sea change.
Political turnover is an even more remote possibility today than it was 12 years ago. On top of the traditional incumbent advantages in name recognition and money-raising, gerrymandering once an art has become a science that precisely packs voters into uncompetitive districts.
The proof, quite simply, is in the numbers: 25 of 26 senators who ran for re-election in 2004 were victorious, while outside of Texas, 396 of 399 House incumbents who ran for re-election won. Victorious challengers to the status quo are the ivory-billed woodpeckers of the political class.
The volcano of the Abramoff scandal that finally erupted in January has, however, provided the necessary ingredient for a potential political tsunami in 2006.
While it's true that both Democrats and Republicans are tainted by allegations of pay-for-play politics, there's no way around the fact that members of the ruling party overwhelmingly populate Planet Abramoff or that its chieftains have an inordinate number of ties to the office of former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.
Voters always declare with certainty their intention to throw the bums out. In practice, they're far less certain about who the bums actually are. A profligate, ethically challenged Congress under Republican leadership makes the act of discernment far easier this year than anytime since 1994.
Democrats have a rare and golden opportunity to alter the balance of political power. The Republican leadership itself has served up the dish of its own defeat.
Yet the Democratic leadership is turning up its nose at this treat and is instead trying to concoct a recipe that the American public simply doesn't want.
Pandering to their far-left base, the Democrats are honing a strategy to make national security their key issue. Perhaps, more accurately, it's national insecurity they're championing. On a broad range of issues, the Democratic leadership can't seem to distinguish between deserved, constructive criticism and the reflexive, nihilistic tendency to oppose anything Bush.
The controversy over domestic National Security Agency surveillance provides the latest evidence that, as regards national security, the Democrats just don't get it.
Democrats are ebullient about upcoming hearings on the eavesdropping program. Some are even deliriously muttering the "I" word impeachment, betraying their motive, which is not to improve the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to meet the exigencies of the war on terror and strike a better balance between civil liberties and security. Instead, it's to engage in a game of "gotcha!" with the White House on civil liberties at the expense of security.
A recent New York Times/CBS News poll asked, "In order to reduce the threat of terrorism, would you be willing or not willing to allow government agencies to monitor the telephone calls and e-mails of Americans that the government is suspicious of?"
The results: 68 percent willing, 29 percent not willing. As I frequently note, polls are fickle. But in this case, the poll question actually understates the government's case, since the surveillance is of communications from the United States not necessarily from Americans to individuals abroad with a known connection to terrorism.
And these percentages conform to polls in 2005 and 2003 that asked the same question and showed similarly lopsided results.
Americans are duly suspicious of President Bush's assertion of a vague, reasonable basis for warrantless surveillance. Astute Democrats might capitalize on this suspicion by sensibly revising FISA and recasting the debate as one of security and civil liberties rather than security or civil liberties.
Because of internal party dynamics and the imperative to appease anti-Bush extremists, they won't. Which is why, despite scandalous Republican control of Congress, the 2006 elections are not likely to be much different from those in 2004 or 2002.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan Gurwitz, a columnist for the San Antonio Express-News, is a co-founder and twice served as Director General of the Future Leaders of the Alliance program at NATO Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. In 1986 he was placed on the Foreign Service Register of the U.S. State Department.Comment by clicking here.
Jonathan Gurwitz Archives
© 2005, Jonathan Gurwitz
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K