Home
In this issue

Dec. 2, 2008

Melanie Phillips: The Mumbai atrocity is a wake-up call for a frighteningly unprepared world

Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report: Strategic Motivations for the Mumbai Attack

Dec. 1, 2008

Max Freidlander, as told to Jacklyn C. Wadler: India Inkings

Mark Steyn: Whodunit!?

Nov. 28, 2008

Rabbi Ahron Rapps: An evil seed that didn't have to be

Melanie Phillips: Carpe diem --- or can we all relax now?

Nov. 26, 2008

Michael Feldberg: Meet the Orthodox Jew who laid groundwork for scientific development of ordnance that undergirds America's current world leadership

Andrea Simantov: Shades of life

Nov. 25, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir : Getting Emotional For Influence

The Kosher Gourmet by Ethel G. Hofman : Thanksiving feast!

Nov. 24, 2008

Rabbi S. Binyomin Ginsberg: 'I just Became a grandchild!'

Barry Rubin: Don't flatter your enemies, protect your friends

Nov. 21, 2008

Rabbi A. Henach Leibowitz: Money matters?

Caroline B. Glick: Civilization walks the plank

Nov. 20, 2008

Rabbi Avi Shafran: Bronfman's blindness

The Kosher Gourmet By Linda Gassenheimer: Portobellos add a hearty flavor to pasta with pesto

Nov, 19, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir : Spread the wealth? Jewish tradition and income equality

Elliot B. Gertel: 'Mad Men': Tackling prejudices or reinforcing them?

Nov, 18, 2008

Dr. Debby Schwarz Hirschhorn: The End of the Age of Reason

Jonathan Tobin: Does Barack + Bibi = Disaster?

Nov, 17, 2008

Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The End of the Age of Reason

Diana West: Gulling Americans into making terror legit?

Nov, 14, 2008

Rabbi A. Henach Leibowitz: The Power of Spiritual Inertia

Caroline B. Glick: The perils ahead

Nov, 13, 2008

Stratfor Intelligence Briefing: How Bush and Obama together could change the Middle East dynamic

The Kosher Gourmet by JeanMarie Brownson: Sweet and savory, crispy and meltingly tender bestilla

Nov, 12, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir : Tyrannical Co-Workers

Michael Doyle: High Court to consider today donated monuments that may have religious messages in public parks

Nov, 11, 2008

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Will Obama stop government officials considering institutionalizing financial jihad?

Jonathan Tobin: They Will Decide Their Own Fate

Nov, 10, 2008

Rabbi Avi Shafran: $8 billion, modern-day Tower of Babel being built?

Barry Rubin: A letter to the president-elect from a Middle East realist

Nov, 7, 2008

Rabbi Francis Nataf: Of Children and Immortality

Caroline B. Glick: Livni's Obama strategy

Nov, 6, 2008

Rabbi Yonason Goldson: How I tricked a classroom of apathetic students into grasping the fallacy of moral relativism

The Kosher Gourmet By Gina Kim: Tips for making the perfect soup --- includes recipes

Nov, 5, 2008

The Jewish Ethicist By Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Destitute Debtors

Bruce Weinstein: 'Religulos': Bad title,even worse movie

Nov, 4, 2008

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Treasury Dept. submits to Shariah law

Frida Ghitis: A surprise for Obama in the Middle East

Nov, 3, 2008

Jonathan Rosenblum: Who says Jews are Smart?

Jonathan Tobin: Was He Wrong About Everything?

March 22, 2007

J-Rhythms with Avraham Rosenblum: JWR's cutting-edge music program showcasing performers -- singers, song writers, musicians, and bands -- who learn and live the Torah lifestyle (OUR NEWEST IGODCAST !)

Oct. 29, 2003
Mortimer B. Zuckerman: Graffiti On History's Walls (MUST-READ!)

Jewish World Review June 19, 2006 / 26 Sivan, 5766

Is there value in an unhappy marriage?

By Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir


Printer Friendly Version

Email this article

How Much Is Too Much?


http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Q: Is there value in an unhappy marriage?


A: It's clear that the ideal is a harmonious marriage that fulfills the needs of both partners for emotional and physical fulfillment in marital and family life. It's also clear that most marriages will fall somewhat short of this ideal, and that not every instance where domestic life falls short of expectations is a good reason to dissolve a marriage. The real question is, how much is too much?


In my book " Meaning in Mitzvot", I presented my understanding of the approach of the Jewish sages, in the following words:


"While divorce is permitted in Jewish law, and a wide variety of marital difficulties can be considered grounds for divorce, divorce is discouraged, and couples are encouraged to make every possible effort to work out their differences. . . Our Sages praised men and women who showed exemplary devotion even to wives and husbands who mistreated them." (1)


A well-known Torah scholar who saw my book was very disturbed by this statement. Her feeling was that my words could be understood as encouraging people to stay in abusive relationships. I want to clarify that this was certainly not my intention, and I don't think that it is in any way implied by my words. I begin by saying that Jewish law has a lenient approach to divorce, and that when difficulties do arise couples are encouraged to work them out, not to suffer through them. I did mention that there are instances of individuals who decided that on the whole their marriage was worth suffering through some mistreatment (I did not say "abuse"), and that our Sages praised (not encouraged) this fortitude.


I lack the stature to differ outright with this renowned individual, but I do want to present my point of view, and the Jewish sources and personal observations which I believe support my statement.


The first Talmudic source I refer to in my book, from tractate Yevamos, is as follows:


Rebbe Chiya's wife used to aggravate him. [Yet] whenever he would find something she liked, he would wrap it in his scarf and bring it to her. Rav said to him, But she aggravates you! He replied, it's enough that they raise our children and save us from sin. Rav Yehudah used to cite to his son Rav Yitzchak the verse: "I find woman more bitter than death." (Eccl. 7:26). He said, Like who? Like your mother. But did we not learn that Rav Yehudah used to teach his son Rav Yitzchak "A person finds fulfillment only with his first wife, as it is written (Prov. 5:18) "May your source be blessed and rejoice in the wife of your youth." And he said, like who? Like your mother! She is quick to anger, but afterwards she is appeased." (2)

Donate to JWR

The second source, from tractate Nedarim, describes a number of women with husbands who were quick to anger, and tried to humiliate their wives by asking them to insult prominent Torah scholars. But the scholars forgave their dignity and consented to be insulted in order to allow the wife to carry out her husband's request and preserve his sense of honor.


Neither source encourages a spouse to endure humiliating treatment, yet it is clear that the long-suffering husbands and wives in question are considered praiseworthy by the sages of the Talmud who retell their stories. The men in the passage in Yevamos know how to recognize the benefits of their marriage and the positive traits of their wives, and the women in the passage in Nedarim apparently felt that if their husbands were appeased and their dignity upheld then they would be reconciled.


One example brought by my critic to demonstrate the benefit of acknowledging when to "let go" is one of the most famous rabbinical authorities in Europe before the war. This rabbi's first wife turned out to be more interested in the salon life of her city than in the yeshiva world, while the rabbi himself was known as one of the most zealous opponents of secular education.


The two divorced and each found a spouse more compatible with his or her unique interests. I am not convinced that this anecdote bears on my statements. There is no evidence that either spouse "mistreated" the other, nor is there any evidence that they made any effort to work out their differences. Perhaps if this rabbi had made a genuine effort to take some interest in the intellectual life of the salons, even if only as a gesture to maintain domestic harmony, and the rebbetzin and her salon companions would have taken a corresponding perfunctory interest in the remarkable profundity of her husband's Talmudic scholarship, they would have advanced not only their own domestic harmony but that of the entire, tragically divided Jewish people, and the Jewish world might look different today.


I will add that this kind of match should in any case be rather unusual, as Jewish law stipulates that a groom is required to look at his wife before the wedding to make sure she is attractive to him, so that he may fulfill the mitzvah of 'Love your fellow as yourself'. (4) My understanding is that this refers not only to physical appearance but rather to all those individual qualities which create compatibility and attraction and the ability to love the spouse.


I will add that a well-publicized research study performed a couple of years ago showed that troubled couples who divorced were no happier a few years after the separation than comparable couples who stayed together. Both groups had some people who were happier and some who were more miserable, in comparable proportions. Many troubled marriages are made bearable with a little investment, and many divorced people are lonely and miserable despite their relief at being separated from an incompatible or even thoughtless spouse.


I'm far from an expert in this field, and I don't mean to take the place of the many highly qualified professionals who provide counseling to troubled couples. But I do feel that my book performs a valuable service by pointing out that while the Talmud recognizes that not every marriage should be saved, it does seem to teach us that showing fortitude and maintaining a positive attitude in even a troubled relationship is in some cases the best response to circumstances, particularly when children are involved.


SOURCES: (1) Meaning in Mitzvot p. 657. (2) Babylonian Talmud, Yevamos 63a-b. (3) Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 65b (There is a misprint in my book and it reads 15b.) (4) Babylonian Talmud, Kiddushin 41a.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes inspiring articles. Sign up for our daily update. It's free. Just click here.

THE JEWISH ETHICIST, NOW IN BOOK FORM

You've enjoyed his columns on JWR for years. Now the Jewish Ethicist has culled his most intriguing — and controversial — offerings in book form.
HARDCOVER
PAPERBACK
Sales help fund JWR.



JWR contributor Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir, formerly of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Reagan administration, is Research Director of the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem, Jerusalem College of Technology. To comment or pose a question, please click here.


Previously:

Where does the Almighty fit into your corporation's mission statement?
Does an expert witness have to be impartial?
Should I give recognition to a modest man who did a great deed?
In representing my firm, can I tell a white lie?
Defrauding insurance to save a life
Can top level management unilaterally give away money to corporate dollars to charity?
Loans to Family Members
How much worker supervision is too much?
Should I turn in a colleague for inappropriate acts?
Priority in charitable giving
Trolls and ogres
How many hours of work is too many?
Can I promote my product by having it unobtrusively written into a story?
He's not heavy he's my brother
All's fair in war?, II
All's fair in war?
Girth vs. worth
Is it proper to tax bequests?
Ethics of Being Overweight
Penalized for working swiftly
When is it a bluff?
'Rate and switch'
My paycheck is late!
Should schools cater to an elite?
All's fair in love?
Comfort and Competition
Do I need the caller's permission to put a call on the speakerphone?
Overtime for lost time
Is it unethical to play suppliers against each other to get the lowest bid possible?
Do family members have precedence in charity allotments?
What the world of business can teach us about our annual process of repentance and renewal
Are religious leaders subject to criticism?
Vindictive Vendor: How can I punish an abusive competitor?
Blogging Ethics: Is the blogger responsible for defamatory posts?







© 2005, The Jewish Ethicist is produced by the JCT Center for Business Ethics