 |
|
May 25, 2012
Mark Clayton: Is Hillary's State Dept. hacking Al Qaeda? Not quite
Erika Bolstad: Temple cancels Wasserman Schultz speech
The Kosher Gourmet by Ethel G. Hofman: The former president of the International Association of Culinary Professionals, whose members included the likes of Julia Child, is back with contemporary Shavous cuisine: Ruby Fruit Soup, Sweet Noodle Kugel with Cheese, Key Lime Curd, Calsone Casserole Frittata with Wild Mushrooms, Sun-dried tomatoes and Olives, Baked Tilapia with Pepper Cheese Cream and Brown Sugar Shortbread
May 24, 2012
Jeff Jacoby: The peace process battered Israel's reputation
Michael Muskal: 'Pro-choice' position hits record low, according to poll
Chris Farrell: Are We in a Tech Bubble?
The Kosher Gourmet by Penelope Wall: PHILLY CHEESE STEAKS --- hold the steak!
May 23, 2012
Tony Pugh: More private colleges offering tuition discounts
Mary Beth Franklin: How to Choose the Right Annuity for You
Tina Susman: The wig wasn't enough: Man gets 13 years for posing as his dead mom
The Kosher Gourmet by Emma Christensen:A simple way to do fish right
May 22, 2012
Warren Richey: Can US group challenge overseas surveillance act? Supreme Court to decide
Thomas M. Anderson: Walking Away From a Mortgage
The Kosher Gourmet by Megan Gordon: Enjoy a celebration of the most rich and layered flavors: Black bean, sweet potato and quinoa chili
May 21, 2012
Mark Clayton: Cybersecurity: How US utilities passed up chance to protect their networks
Howard LaFranchi: NATO summit: Who will foot the bill for long-term Afghanistan security?
Chris Farrell : Earn Dividends in Emerging Markets with This WisdomTree ETF
Stephen Whiteside, Ph.D. : Mayo Clinic Medical Edge: Social anxiety disorder --- or just shy?
Guy Jackson : Victim's father regrets death of Lockerbie bomber
The Kosher Gourmet by Mario Batali: Famed chef's veal shoulder farsumagru: A festive meat course for late spring
May 18, 2012
Rabbi Berel Wein: Striving: The People of the Book's Book for (All of) the People
Steven Goldberg: 5 Great Stock Picks and the Exchange-Traded Fund that Owns Them
Mary Pickett, M.D.: Ask the Harvard Experts: Don't be forced into gluten-free lifestyle based merely on a doctor's false-positive test
The Kosher Gourmet by Carolyn Malcoun: DIY healthy lunchbox treats: HOMEMADE FRUIT BARS for kids and brown-bagging adults alike
May 17, 2012
Warren Richey: Teacher fired for being unwed and pregnant can sue religious school, court rules
Josh Mitnick: Netanyahu's 'centrist' coalition is already proving it's anything but
Steven Goldberg: Earn Dividends in Emerging Markets with This WisdomTree ETF
Amina Khan: Research links coffee to lower death rates
The Kosher Gourmet by Faith Duran : Cheesy Potato Breakfast Casserole with Cheddar and Sun-Dried Tomatoes
May 16, 2012
Carmen Terzic, M.D., Ph.D. : Mayo Clinic Medical Edge: A variety of exercises can help improve balance
Melissa Healy: National strategy on Alzheimer's disease aims to halt it by 2025
The Kosher Gourmet by Joyce White : GOODNESS GRACIOUS: GREENS! 4 winning recipes that are no longer just for down-home folks (Includes expert tips & techniques)
May 15, 2012
Kristen Chick: Obama administration resumes arms sales to Bahrain despite serious unresolved human rights issues. Activists feel abandoned
Pat Mertz Esswein: Homes are now affordable again and mortgage rates are low. What you need to know before you buy
Kathy Kristof: Our Practical Investor Fights Inflation with These 6 Investments
Sue Hubbard, M.D.: The Kid's Doctor: Lactose intolerant young child? Check again
The Kosher Gourmet by Kathy Hunt: Spread a Little Excitement with EXOTIC CONDIMENTS (4 RECIPES)
May 14, 2012
Lisa Gerstner: How to Protect Your Identity, Finances If You Lose Your Phone
Harvard Health Letters: Heart disease and dementia
The Kosher Gourmet by Megan Gordon: MANGO COCONUT OAT MORNING MUFFINS are a bright but hearty delight
May 11, 2012
Jessica L. Anderson: Get the Best Deal on a Used Car
Jett Stone: Forget face-lifts and fake knees. Scientists have seen the fountain of youth --- and it's broccoli
The Kosher Gourmet by Chef Mario Batali: The famed chef's vegetable dish that tastes true to the season: FAVAS AND SUGAR SNAP PEAS WITH POTATOES AND TARRAGON
May 10, 2012
Sergei L. Loiko: Putin sends warning to U.S., NATO in Victory Day speech at Red Square
Mary Rourke: How being a 'mentch' got Vidal Sasoon his start and fighting in Israel's War of Independence provided him with confidence and a strong sense of his own identity
Jeff Bertolucci: Get Home Phone Service for Less Than $10 a Month
The Kosher Gourmet by Betty Rosbottom: Gleaming with its golden, crimson, and snowy white hues, this silken smooth and creamy STRAWBERRY ORANGE TRIFLE looks impressive, but is easy to prepare
May 9, 2012
Sharon Palmer, R.D. How you can reduce your risk -- or delay -- chronic diseases associated with aging
|
| |
Jewish World Review
May 8, 2006
/ 10 Iyar, 5766
Executive discretion
By
Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir
Can top level management unilaterally give away money to corporate dollars to charity?
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Q: Our non-profit organization recently obtained a donation from a publicly owned corporation. The approval was given directly by the CEO, without going through any kind of committee. Can we keep the money?
A: The issue of corporate donations is a vexing dilemma in business ethics. Some groups, including some "corporate social responsibility" (CSR) investors, view the extent of charitable donations as an indicator of how ethical and socially responsible a company is. Other analysts consider such donations a breach of ethics, since management is giving away shareholder money without a clear mandate to do so. Rabbi Aaron Levine is his book Case Studies in Jewish Business Ethics, expresses a skeptical attitude towards such "manager's pet" donations for this very reason. Milton Friedman in a famous article asks why management should give away money to charity instead of distributing it to shareholders who are perfectly capable of giving it away themselves.
The confusion surrounding this issue is well illustrated by a recent meeting I had with the leader of an internationally known think tank. One of the first things this director told me was that his organization was highly skeptical about the entire field of "corporate social responsibility". Like Friedman, he felt that the main responsibility of corporations was to do a good job in the economic enterprises they undertake, and for which they were founded. A few minutes later this same individual complained that in the past his organization had regularly obtained important donations from major corporations on the say-so of leading executives sympathetic to the values of his think-tank, but that lately corporate donations had been delegated to lower functionaries who always want to know "What's in it for our firm?" Of course this attitude is the only one justified if we eschew the idea of corporate social responsibility!
In previous columns I have elaborated my own position: That such donations are justified when the company is in a unique position to provide aid. Perhaps the company gives money whose effectiveness is augmented by special expertise the company possesses, or by a special degree of oversight it can apply. Or perhaps the company is uniquely obligated to give aid because of some past transgression or because of neighborly obligations. This situation answers in large measure Milton Friedman's objection (as his article implicitly acknowledges).
The ideal situation for a public company is to have a transparent policy with explicit criteria for donations. This approach minimizes the worst risk: that management decisions are based neither on benefit to the firm nor on benefit to the society but rather on benefit to the managers themselves. (Such donations were one small part of the overall pattern of corruption that characterized the Enron Corporation.) It also enables shareholders decide if they truly desire to donate some of their profits in this way (as CSR shareholders certainly do).
In your case, the company has no such policy, and the money has already been given. I would recommend the following course of action: Ask yourself if you honestly feel that a donation to your organization fits in with the general management ideals of the donating corporation, as these would be expressed if they were to formulate an explicit donation policy. Your judgment should be based both on the relationship between your non-profit and the line of business of the giving firm, as well as on the amount. Many corporations would find it advantageous to give a modest sum to promote educational initiatives in the local community, but would not logically give any money to a religious organization or give any large sums to charity.
Of course the answer to this question will be partially dependent on your own actions. If you have the ability to publicize the donation in a way that will provide significant good will to the donor, then the chances are greater that the answer will be positive. Your answer should take into account any publicity you would be willing to provide.
If the answer is yes, it would be best to ask the manager who approved the donation to get acknowledgement from some more neutral figure. This would ideally be by the board, but realistically the board cannot get involved if the figure is relatively small. Probably there is some kind of community liaison or spokesperson who as part of his or her job is authorized to approve small contributions to local charities; it would be good for all involved if this person writes a letter expressing their awareness of the donation and affirming that it meets the company's general criteria. Make clear any potential you have for creating goodwill for the donor.
If the answer is no, or if the subsequent acknowledgement is not forthcoming or seems forced, you should give back the money. Clearly enunciate your desire not to accept donations that are not in accordance with the company's usual criteria.
Just as the donating company should not be dealing with these situations on an ad hoc basis but rather have a thought-out policy, the same applies to non-profits. Your organization should formulate a general policy for accepting donations from corporations which incorporates some of the ideas we have just discussed. This will avoid awkwardness in future situations. After all, you don't want to offend the generous manager who approved the donation; it is much easier to say "Our organization has a policy of not accepting such donations" than it is to say, "I don't think your donation is kosher". Charitable organizations are no less bound to have ethics policies than business firms are!
There is a remarkable parallel to this analysis in the Shulchan Aruch, the authoritative Code of Jewish Law. In chapter 248 of the second volume (Yoreh Deah), the Shulchan Aruch states that in general a guardian for minor orphans shouldn't give charity from their assets. The reason is that being minors, their judgment is not sufficiently developed for them to decide on charitable gifts. When they are grown up, the money will still be there, and they will be able to decide what to do with it. This is similar to the status of shareholders. The difficulty of reaching a consensus of shareholders is a disability not unlike that of minors, and like minors, there is no compelling reason for the "guardian" or manager to give charity since ultimately the money will reach the shareholder, in the form of dividends or proceeds, and then he will be free to use the money for charity according to his judgment.
However, there are two exceptions to this rule. One is that it is permissible for the guardian to give charity if this is for the benefit of the youngsters, by giving them a good name. This corresponds to giving charity on behalf of a firm when it will promote good will and advance their business objectives. The other rule is that it is permissible to give for urgent needs which these youngsters are particularly obligated in. The example of the Shulchan Aruch is if they have poor relatives in urgent straits. Of course the needs of poor individuals are the responsibility of the entire community, but close relatives have a higher degree of obligation. This corresponds to giving charity to the local community and for needs which the company is uniquely situated to help with.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes inspiring articles. Sign up for our daily update. It's free. Just click here.
THE JEWISH ETHICIST, NOW IN BOOK FORM
You've enjoyed his columns on JWR for years. Now the Jewish Ethicist has culled his most intriguing — and controversial — offerings in book form.
HARDCOVER
PAPERBACK
Sales help fund JWR.
|
JWR contributor Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir, formerly of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Reagan
administration, is Research Director of the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem, Jerusalem College of Technology.
To comment or pose a question, please click here.
Previously:
Loans to Family Members
How much worker supervision is too much?
Should I turn in a colleague for inappropriate acts?
Priority in charitable giving
Trolls and ogres
How many hours of work is too many?
Can I promote my product by having it unobtrusively written into a story?
He's not heavy he's my brother
All's fair in war?, II
All's fair in war?
Girth vs. worth
Is it proper to tax bequests?
Ethics of Being Overweight
Penalized for working swiftly
When is it a bluff?
'Rate and switch'
My paycheck is late!
Should schools cater to an elite?
All's fair in love?
Comfort and Competition
Do I need the caller's permission to put a call on the speakerphone?
Overtime for lost time
Is it unethical to play suppliers against each other to get the lowest bid possible?
Do family members have precedence in charity allotments?
What the world of business can teach us about our annual process of repentance and renewal
Are religious leaders subject to criticism?
Vindictive Vendor: How can I punish an abusive competitor?
Blogging Ethics: Is the blogger responsible for defamatory posts?
© 2005, The Jewish Ethicist is produced by the JCT Center for Business Ethics
|
