March 5, 2014
Netanyahu's inaction to Obama's provocations sends powerful message
Kerry, after apparent criticism by Schumer, seeks to allay skepticism on diplomacy
How to ruin a perfectly good kid in 10 simple steps
2014 Oscars played it safe, but was faith lost in the shuffle?
Apple joins Hobby Lobby in touting corporate values beyond profit
March 3, 2014
Alina Dain Sharon: In the Hebrew calendar, a leap year has extra month, not day
Latest Obama appointment to prove Prez set on emasculating so-called Israel Lobby
Jewish World Review
July 27, 2006
/ 2 Menachem-Av 5766
Historical amnesia at the NAACP
At an event in North Carolina to mark Black History Month last February, Julian
Bond, the chairman of the NAACP, unleashed a blistering attack on the Bush
administration and the Republican Party. Among other discourtesies, he compared
President George W. Bush's judicial appointees to the Taliban and described
former Attorney General John Ashcroft, not for the first time, as "J. Edgar
"The Republican Party," Bond was reported as saying, "would have the American
flag and the swastika flying side by side." (According to other reports, Bond
said that the GOP's "idea of equal rights is the American flag and the
Confederate swastika flying side-by-side.")
Such partisan bigotry from the chairman of a supposedly nonpartisan organization
makes it easy to understand why for five years Bush refused to attend the
NAACP's annual conventions. More of a mystery is why he changed his mind this
year and why, rather than attempt to refute Bond's venomous caricature of his
party, he seemed to accept it.
"I understand that many African-Americans distrust my political party," Bush
said (to shouts of "Yes!" and applause from the audience, according to the White
House transcript). "I consider it a tragedy that the party of Abraham Lincoln
let go of its historic ties with the African-American community. For too long my
party wrote off the African-American vote, and many African-Americans wrote off
the Republican Party."
Republicans often take this rueful tone when talking about their party in the
context of race. Democrats, who routinely get 85 percent or more of the black
vote, never do. But the Republican rue isn't justified by the facts. Neither is
the willingness of black voters to be taken for granted by Democrats.
Look around. Black candidates are serious contenders for governor in three
states this year, and two of them Lynn Swann in Pennsylvania and Kenneth
Blackwell in Ohio are Republicans. The third, Democrat Deval Patrick, is
running in Massachusetts, a quintessentially blue state that has managed to
elect only one African-American to statewide office in its entire history:
former US Senator Edward Brooke a Republican.
Bush may have given short shrift to the NAACP for several years, but from his
first day in office he has surrounded himself with a record number of senior
black policy makers. Among them have been the nation's first black secretary of
state, Colin Powell and its second, Condoleezza Rice.
Of course the Republican Party's record on race is not without its blemishes.
For example, at a 100th birthday party for Strom Thurmond in 2002, Senator Trent
Lott of Mississippi praised the former Dixiecrat's segregationist 1948 campaign
for president. Republicans were scandalized and forced Lott to resign as Senate
Democrats, by contrast, have never moved to purge Senator Robert Byrd of West
Virginia, a former Kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan who wrote in 1947 that he would
never agree to fight "with a Negro by my side" and would "rather . . . die a
thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than
to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels." Byrd
filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and is the only senator to have voted
against both of the black justices named to the Supreme Court the liberal
Thurgood Marshall and the conservative Clarence Thomas. While Byrd has said his
racism is a thing of the past, that didn't stop him from using the N-word twice
in an interview on national TV in 2001. Remarkably, none of this has harmed
Byrd's standing within the Democratic Party, nor the party's standing among
Bond may not share Republican principles or legislative priorities, but for him
to cast the GOP as the party of fascism and racism is beyond surreal. After all,
it was the Democratic Party that vehemently defended slavery, the Democratic
Party that supported the Dred Scott decision, and the Democratic Party that
opposed the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution. It was
Democrats who founded the Ku Klux Klan, Democrats who repeatedly blocked
anti-lynching bills, and Democrats who enacted Jim Crow segregation across the
Everyone knows that it was a 19th-century Republican president, Abraham Lincoln,
who issued the Emancipation Proclamation. But how many know that it was a
20th-century Democratic president, Woodrow Wilson, who segregated the federal
government, appointed unabashed racists to his Cabinet, and endorsed "The Birth
of a Nation," D.W. Griffith's celluloid celebration of the Klan?
Eventually happily the Democratic Party outgrew Wilson's racism. By 1964 a
majority of congressional Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act as did an
even larger majority of congressional Republicans.
Today's Democratic Party is nothing like the racist stronghold it used to be;
anyone who claimed otherwise would be trafficking in foul demagoguery. That is
just what Bond traffics in when he speaks with equal foulness about today's
Republican Party. The NAACP is better than that, and perhaps Bush should have
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
Jeff Jacoby Archives
© 2006, Boston Globe