
 |
|
May 13, 2013
David G. Savage: Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Warren Richey: Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
Fred Weir: At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross : Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same? With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Sandy Kleffman: Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Roy Gutman: Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Mark Clayton: Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Kim Murphy: Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Pete Spotts: Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May: Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.: How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Morgan Housel Admit it: No one has any idea what's going on
April 22, 2013
US man departing country arrested on terror charges
Barbara Williams: An unorthodox but growing treatment in a 9-year-old's battle against cancer
April 19, 2013
Caroline B. Glick: Why Obama's visit to Israel had no impact on public opinion or government policy
Morgan Housel: Gold collapse: The start of something big?
Pete Spotts: Livable super-Earths? Two candidates among Kepler's latest finds
April 17, 2013
Shira Rubin: Too much of a good thing? 'Palestinians' realize downside of foreign aid boom
Morgan Housel: BAD NEWS: EVERYONE IS RIGHT!
April 15, 2013
Kristen Chick: Egyptian Christians respond with harsh words to attack -- rocks, Molotov cocktails, and gunfire -- against main cathedral
Marcy Darnovsky and Karuna Jaggar: High Court to decide if you should own your DNA
Howard LaFranchi: US bracing for more Russian blowback after taking action against 18 more human rights violators
April 12, 2013
Mark Clayton: New cybersecurity bill: Privacy threat or crucial band-aid?
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom: Jackie Robinson's Friend, Hank Greenberg; CNN's Jake Tapper; Texas County in the News is named for 19thC. Jewish soldier and Congressman
The Kosher Gourmet by Susan Russo: FRUITY QUINOA STUFFED PEPPERS: A flavorful, colorful and edible vessel of delicately fluffy, mildly nutty filling combined with chewy apricots, tangy cherries, and crunchy pistachios
April 10, 2013
Peter Grier: North Korean missiles: Could US shoot them down?
Morgan Housel: Warning: Don't waste your capital being fooled by profit prophets
Donald Hensrud, M.D.: Mayo Clinic Medical Edge: Take vitamin supplements with caution --- even approved, they may actually do damage
Eryn Brown: 74 DNA discoveries move cure closer for three cancers
April 8, 2013
Jonathan Tobin: What Part of No Preconditions Do American Jews Not Get?
Fred Weir: Is Putin finally trading his own party for a new power base?
|
| |
Jewish World Review
April 6, 2006
/ 8 Nissan, 5766
Hold that opinion
By
Jeff Jacoby
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
For obvious reasons, journalism places a premium on speed. When news breaks on Tuesday, reporters spring into action,
intent on getting the story into the paper on Wednesday and maybe even online or on the air by Tuesday night.
For reasons that are rather less obvious, opinion journalism the business not of reporting what happened, but of
commenting on it also tends to place a premium on speed. When that story breaks on Tuesday, members of the pundits'
guild spring into action as well. Editorial writers and columnists tell their readers what the news means. TV talking heads and
radio pontificators pass judgment. Internet bloggers the commentariat's newest, increasingly influential players scramble to
weigh in. And the more compelling or startling the news, the more immediate, and often the more adamant, the opinions
expressed.
All of this is very democratic and robust; it certainly makes for a noisy and bustling marketplace of ideas. But does it make
for a more thoughtful one?
I have always believed that racing to report a story makes a lot more sense than racing to express a point of view about it.
No doubt there are some sages who don't need time to reflect or to wait for more facts, or to see how a story turns out in
order to generate some well-chosen words of genuine wisdom. My own experience is that insight and good judgment don't
usually work that way. I find that thought and a bit of distance vastly improve the odds of coming up with something worth
saying and that rushing to tell the world what to think of the latest headlines makes for shallow, half-baked, or unfair
commentary.
Case in point: the release of Jill Carroll.
When the Christian Science Monitor reporter was set free in Baghdad last week, she insisted at first that her captors had not
harmed her. "I was treated very well; it's important people know that," she said in an interview conducted by the Iraqi Islamic
Party, the Sunni organization into whose hands she was released. "They never threatened me in any way."
On the same day, a videotape made before she was freed was posted on the Internet. In it, Carroll denounced the United
States and praised the insurgents as "good people fighting an honorable fight." Asked by the interviewer if she has "a message
for Mr. Bush," her answer was one-sided and hostile:
"Yeah, he needs to stop this war. He knows this war is wrong. He knows that it was illegal from the very beginning. He
knows that it was built on a mountain of lies . . . and he doesn't care about his own people."
To some people hearing this, it was plain that Carroll could only have been speaking under duress. "Jill Carroll forced to
make propaganda video as price of freedom," the Monitor headlined its story the next day. Anyone tempted to accuse Carroll
of some other motive, cautioned Ellen Knickmeyer of The Washington Post, "should think about what they would do (after)
three months with machine guns held to their heads."
But others, in their haste to express an opinion, pronounced Carroll guilty of collaboration.
"May as well just come right out and say she was a willing participant," one conservative blog announced. Declared another:
"She was anti-America when she went over there and I say the kidnapping was a put up deal from the get go." The executive
producer of a prominent radio/television talk show described Carroll on the air as "the kind of woman who would wear one of
those suicide vests. You know, walk into the try and sneak into the Green Zone . . . . She's like the Taliban Johnny or
something."
At a popular site on the left, meanwhile, there was scorn for the "totally inappropriate" assumptions that Carroll's warm
words about her captors could be "motivated by anything other than a desire to tell the truth."
Yet one day later, once she was safely out of Iraq, Carroll issued a statement repudiating the "things that I was forced to say
while captive." She bitterly labeled the men who kidnapped her and murdered her translator, Alan Enwiya, as "criminals, at
best." What she thought of the opinionated prodigies who couldn't wait to climb on their soapboxes and tell the world what to
think about her, Carroll didn't say. Perhaps she was being polite. Perhaps, unlike them, she prefers to think before she vents.
With the swelling influence of the Internet and the blogosphere, the pressure to generate instant reaction is only going to
grow more intense. Dozens of traditional news outlets, for example, now maintain blogs of their own. But it is an unhealthy
impulse, and commentators in every medium should resist it. First impressions are not the same as thoughtful commentary.
It's nice to be first. It's better to be right.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
Jeff Jacoby Archives
© 2006, Boston Globe
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Jay Ambrose
Michael Barone
Barrywood
Lori Borgman
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
Christine Flowers
Frank J. Gaffney
Bernie Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Argus Hamilton
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Ron Hart
Nat Hentoff
A. Barton Hinkle
Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ch. Krauthammer
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Ann McFeatters
Dale McFeatters
Dana Milbank
Jeanne Moos
Dick Morris
Jim Mullen
Deroy Murdock
Judge A. Napolitano
Bill O'Reilly
Clarence Page
Kathleen Parker
Star Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Sharon Randall
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Heather Robinson
Debra J. Saunders
Martin Schram
Greg Schwem
Culture Shlock
David Shribman
Roger Simon
Lenore Skenazy
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Ben Stein
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Dan Thomasson
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
ZeitGeist
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Lisa Benson
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
John Branch
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
Matt Davies
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Glenn Foden
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Walt Handelsman
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holbert
David Horsey
Lee Judge
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Jimmy Margulies
Jack Ohman
Michael Ramirez
Rob Rogers
Drew Sheneman
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Scott Stantis
Danna Summers
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters
Dan Wasserman

Tech Q&A
Mr. Know-It-All
Ask Doctor K
Richard Lederer
Frugal Living
On Nutrition
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
|