May 24, 2013
May 22, 2013
They launched the 'Arab Spring' but now yearn for the good old days of a strongman
May 20, 2013
Richard A. Serrano: Is Meir Kahane's assassin now a changed man?
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
March 24, 2010
/ 9 Nissan 5770
No place for race
As if Tiger Woods's life isn't complicated enough these days, now he has to deal with the 2010 Census.
Question 9 on the questionnaire sent by the US Census Bureau to most American homes asks for the race of each individual living there. It offers 15 options, each with its own little check-off box. "Mark one or more boxes," the instructions say. Woods is part white (Dutch, to be precise), part black, part American Indian, part Chinese, and part Thai. So perhaps he should mark five of the check-off boxes the ones labeled "White," "Black, African Am., or Negro," "American Indian or Alaska Native," "Chinese," and "Other Asian," specifying "Thai" on the line provided beneath "Other Asian."
On the other hand, maybe Woods should go with "Other Asian/Thai" alone his mother, Kultida Woods, is half Thai, and Woods has said that he considers himself "more Thai than anything."
On the other other hand, Woods has famously dubbed himself "Cablinasian," a coinage meant to encompass his Caucasian, black, Indian, and Asian ancestry. So his best bet might be to check off the box for "Some Other Race," then print "Cablinasian" on the line below. To be sure, it's a term he invented, but so what? The Census Bureau explicitly defines "race" as "a self-identification data item in which respondents choose the race or races with which they most closely identify." If Cablinasian is the racial identity with which Woods feels most comfortable, that ought to be his answer to Question 9.
But is that the identity with which Woods most closely identifies? After winning the Masters golf tournament in 1997 at age 21, Woods issued a detailed statement meant to explain his multifarious racial roots to a public eager for information about him. "The bottom line," it concluded, "is that I am an American . . . and proud of it! That is who I am and what I am."
You don't have to be Tiger Woods to feel that way. If the government is going to insist that we hang a racial classification around our necks, I daresay there are millions of us who will identify ourselves as "American" period.
"Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life," argued Thurgood Marshall in the brief he wrote for the NAACP in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma. Marshall and the NAACP were then champions of colorblindness, not only because of the evil uses to which the racial cataloguing of Americans had long been put, but also because, as they pointed out in their brief that year for another Supreme Court case, Sweatt v. Painter: "There is no understandable factual basis for classification by race."
If that truth could be perceived in 1950, how much more obvious must it be in 2010, when the human genome has been mapped when it is clearer than ever that there is no genetic or biological rationale for sorting people by race, nor any coherent system for doing so? In 1850, the Census Bureau divided Americans into "white," "black" and "mulatto"; by 1890, it was classifying "Japanese" and "Chinese" as races, along with "Negro," "mulatto," "quadroon," "octoroon," and "white." Based on this year's enumeration, the government proudly announces, "Tabulations will be available for 63 race categories six single-race categories and 57 different combinations of two or more races."
Plainly, if we wait for the US Census to abandon its obsession with race, we will wait forever. Six decades after Marshall's NAACP denounced racial taxonomy as both false and wicked, a powerful "diversity" lobby (which, sad to say, includes the modern NAACP) protects that taxonomy, and the racial spoils system it fuels.
But we don't have to play along. The Constitution requires that Americans be counted every decade; it says nothing about counting them by race, just as it says nothing about doing so by religion or party affiliation. The Census questionnaire doesn't ask how (or if) we worship or vote, and it would be improved by not asking the question about race. One way to make that point is by rejecting Question 9's presumption that racial classifications are legitimate.
In 1850, in an editorial headlined "Are Americans a race?," the New York Times asserted: "The easiest solution of our race problem is to declare that Americans are Americans." Good advice then; good advice now.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
Jeff Jacoby Archives
© 2010, Boston Globe
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K