
 |
|
May 20, 2013
Melissa Healy: Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom : Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak: WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage: Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Warren Richey: Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
Fred Weir: At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross : Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same? With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Sandy Kleffman: Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Roy Gutman: Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Mark Clayton: Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Kim Murphy: Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Pete Spotts: Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May: Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.: How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Feb. 26, 2007
/ 8 Adar 5767
Love, marriage, and the baby carriage
By
Jeff Jacoby
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Is marriage intrinsically connected to bearing and raising children? Advocates
of same-sex marriage often argue peremptorily that it is not .
"In today's society," Yale law professor William Eskridge asserts in The Case
for Same-Sex Marriage, "the importance of marriage is relational and not
procreational." The privileged status of marriage in modern society, in other
words, has to do with the love and commitment of the spouses, not with the
needs of any children those spouses may produce. In its 2003 Goodridge decision
mandating same-sex marriage, the Massachusestts Supreme Judicial Court was even
more emphatic. To the argument that the state's interest in marriage is
connected to procreation, the SJC replied categorically: "This is incorrect."
As evidence that marriage and childrearing are not fundamentally related,
same-sex marriage proponents frequently point out that married couples aren't
required to have children. No law prevents infertile couples from marrying or
orders childless marriages dissolved. If procreation is so important to
marriage, they say, why should elderly couples, or couples determined not to
have children, be permitted to wed?
Now a group of same-sex marriage supporters in Washington state has taken that
argument to what even they describe as an "absurd" length.
Archly calling themselves the Washington Defense of Marriage Alliance, the
activists are promoting Initiative 957, a ballot measure that would restrict
marriage rights to men and women capable of bearing children.
Couples would be required to have a child within three years of getting
married, or their marriage would be annulled. Non procreating couples could
stay together if they wished, but their union would be classified as
"unrecognized," and they would be legally ineligible for marital benefits.
To be sure, the activists behind this proposal don't expect it to become law.
Even if voters were to approve something so outlandish, the Washington Supreme
Court would strike it down. Alliance organizer Gregory Gadow says the
initiative is offered "in the spirit of political street theater." On the
group's website, however, his tone takes on a harder edge. "At the very least,
it should be good fun to see the social conservatives who have long screamed
that marriage exists for the sole purpose of procreation be forced to choke on
their own rhetoric."
But Gadow and his fellow activists are assaulting a straw man. No mainstream
opponent of same-sex marriage claims that having children is the sole purpose
of wedlock. Marriages can serve any number of purposes, as diverse as the
people entering into them cementing the bond between devoted partners,
guaranteeing financial security, having a legitimate sexual outlet, ensuring
companionship, and so on. People get married for various reasons; the desire to
raise a family is only one of them.
What makes marriage a public institution, however the reason it is
regulated by law and given an elevated legal status is that it provides
something no healthy society can do without: a stable environment in which men
and women can create and bring up the next generation, and in which children
can enter the world with mothers and fathers committed to their well-being.
Because sex between men and women makes children, and because children tend to
do best when raised by their mothers and fathers, society has a vested interest
in encouraging long-term, monogamous, heterosexual marriage. True, not all
married couples reproduce. But every opposite-sex marriage has the ability to
give a father and a mother to any child the couple creates or adopts. That is
something no same-sex couple can provide, which is one reason homosexual
marriage has never become a social institution.
| BUY THE BOOK … |
| 
at a discount by clicking HERE.
|
|
Of course procreation is not the only reason to marry, but to insist that
marriage is not closely related to having children is like arguing, to use an
analogy offered by marriage scholar David Blankenhorn, that cars are not
intrinsically connected to driving.
"When you acquire ownership of a car," Blankenhorn writes in his forthcoming
book, The Future of Marriage, "society does not impose upon you a binding
obligation to drive it. If you buy a car but fail to drive it, the state does
not for that reason revoke your driver's license. . . . Cars can be about many
things, including pleasure, aesthetics, economic gain, and social status." But
whether any particular car is driven or not, cars and driving are intrinsically
linked.
Similarly, whatever the circumstances of any married couple, marriage and
procreation are intrinsically connected. Men and women make babies; babies need
mothers and fathers. That is why there has always been a public stake in the
marriage of husbands and wives. And why no such stake exists in the union of
same-sex couples.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
Jeff Jacoby Archives
© 2006, Boston Globe
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Jay Ambrose
Michael Barone
Barrywood
Lori Borgman
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
Christine Flowers
Frank J. Gaffney
Bernie Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Argus Hamilton
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Ron Hart
Nat Hentoff
A. Barton Hinkle
Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ch. Krauthammer
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Ann McFeatters
Dale McFeatters
Dana Milbank
Jeanne Moos
Dick Morris
Jim Mullen
Deroy Murdock
Judge A. Napolitano
Bill O'Reilly
Clarence Page
Kathleen Parker
Star Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Sharon Randall
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Heather Robinson
Debra J. Saunders
Martin Schram
Greg Schwem
Culture Shlock
David Shribman
Roger Simon
Lenore Skenazy
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Ben Stein
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Dan Thomasson
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
ZeitGeist
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Lisa Benson
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
John Branch
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
Matt Davies
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Glenn Foden
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Walt Handelsman
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holbert
David Horsey
Lee Judge
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Jimmy Margulies
Jack Ohman
Michael Ramirez
Rob Rogers
Drew Sheneman
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Scott Stantis
Danna Summers
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters
Dan Wasserman

Tech Q&A
Mr. Know-It-All
Ask Doctor K
Richard Lederer
Frugal Living
On Nutrition
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
|