May 13, 2013
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Admit it: No one has any idea what's going on
April 22, 2013
US man departing country arrested on terror charges
An unorthodox but growing treatment in a 9-year-old's battle against cancer
April 19, 2013
Caroline B. Glick:
Why Obama's visit to Israel had no impact on public opinion or government policy
Gold collapse: The start of something big?
Livable super-Earths? Two candidates among Kepler's latest finds
April 17, 2013
Too much of a good thing? 'Palestinians' realize downside of foreign aid boom
BAD NEWS: EVERYONE IS RIGHT!
April 15, 2013
Egyptian Christians respond with harsh words to attack -- rocks, Molotov cocktails, and gunfire -- against main cathedral
Marcy Darnovsky and Karuna Jaggar:
High Court to decide if you should own your DNA
US bracing for more Russian blowback after taking action against 18 more human rights violators
April 12, 2013
New cybersecurity bill: Privacy threat or crucial band-aid?
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom:
The Kosher Gourmet by Susan Russo:
Jackie Robinson's Friend, Hank Greenberg; CNN's Jake Tapper; Texas County in the News is named for 19thC. Jewish soldier and Congressman
FRUITY QUINOA STUFFED PEPPERS: A flavorful, colorful and edible vessel of delicately fluffy, mildly nutty filling combined with chewy apricots, tangy cherries, and crunchy pistachios
April 10, 2013
North Korean missiles: Could US shoot them down?
Warning: Don't waste your capital being fooled by profit prophets
Donald Hensrud, M.D.:
Mayo Clinic Medical Edge: Take vitamin supplements with caution --- even approved, they may actually do damage
74 DNA discoveries move cure closer for three cancers
April 8, 2013
Jonathan Tobin: What Part of No Preconditions Do American Jews Not Get?
Is Putin finally trading his own party for a new power base?
Jewish World Review
January 14, 2008
/ 7 Shevat 5768
Top medical journal's outlandish political exaggeration
Few medical journals have the storied reputation of The Lancet, a British
publication founded in 1823. In the course of its long history, The Lancet has
published work of exceptional influence, such as Joseph Lister's principles of
antiseptics in 1867 and Howard Florey's Nobel Prize-winning discoveries on
penicillin in 1940. Today it is one of the most frequently cited medical
journals in the world.
So naturally there was great interest when the Lancet published a study in
October 2006, three weeks before the midterm US elections, reporting that
655,000 people had died in Iraq as a result of the US-led war.
Hundreds of news outlets, to say nothing of antiwar activists and lawmakers,
publicized the astonishing figure, which was more than 10 times the death toll
estimated by other sources. The Iraqi health ministry, for example, put the
mortality level through June 2006 at 50,000. Iraq Body Count, a nonpartisan
anti-war group that maintains a public database of the war's victims, tallied
some 45,000 Iraqi dead. If The Lancet's number was accurate, more Iraqis had
died in the 2½ years since the US invasion than during the eight-year war with
President Bush, asked about the study, dismissed it out of hand: "I don't
consider it a credible report." Tony Blair's spokesman also brushed it off as
"not . . . anywhere near accurate."
But the media played it up, for the most part unquestioningly. "One in 40
Iraqis killed since invasion," blared a front-page headline in the Guardian, a
leading British paper. CNN.com's story began: "War has wiped out about 655,000
Iraqis, or more than 500 people a day, since the US-led invasion, a new study
reports." The CBS Evening News announced "a new and stunning measure of the
havoc the American invasion unleashed in Iraq.... 655,000 Iraqis -- 2.5 percent
of the entire population -- have died as a consequence of the war."
Few journalists questioned the integrity of the study or its authors, Gilbert
Burnham and Les Roberts of Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of
Public Health, and Iraqi scientist Riyadh Lafta. NPR's Richard Harris reported
asking Burnham, "Right before the election you're making this announcement. Is
this politically motivated? And he said, no, it's not politically motivated."
Burnham told Newsweek the same thing: "There's no political motivation in this.
I feel very confident in the numbers."
But the truth, it turns out, is that the report was drenched with politics, and
its jaw-dropping conclusions should have inspired anything but confidence.
In an extensively researched cover story last week, National Journal took a
close look under the hood of the Lancet/Johns Hopkins study. Reporters Neil
Munro and Carl M. Cannon found that it was marred by grave flaws, such as
unsupervised Iraqi survey teams, and survey samples that were too small to be
statistically valid. The study's authors refused to release most of their
underlying data so other researchers could double-check it. The single disk
they finally, grudgingly, supplied contained suspicious evidence of
"data-heaping" -- that is, fabricated numbers. Researchers failed to gather
basic demographic data from those they interviewed, a key safeguard against
"They failed to do any of the [routine] things to prevent fabrication," Fritz
Scheuren, vice president for statistics at the National Opinion Research
Center, told the reporters.
Bad as the study's methodological defects were, its political taint was worse:
Much of the funding for the study came from the Open Society Institute of
leftist billionaire George Soros, a strident critic of the Iraq war who, as Munro
and Cannon point out, "spent $30 million trying to defeat Bush in 2004."
Coauthors Burnham and Roberts were avowed opponents of the Iraq war, and
submitted their report to The Lancet on the condition that it be published before
the election. Roberts, a self-described "advocate" committed to "ending the war,"
even sought the Democratic nomination for New York's 24th Congressional District.
"It was a combination of Iraq and Katrina that just put me over the top," he told
Lancet editor Richard Horton "also makes no secret of his leftist politics,"
Munro and Cannon write. At a September 2006 rally, he publicly denounced "this axis
of Anglo-American imperialism" for causing "millions of people . . . to die in
poverty and disease." Under Horton, The Lancet has increasingly been accused of
shoddiness and sensationalism. In 2005, 30 leading British scientists blasted
Horton's "desperate headline-seeking" and charged him with running "badly conducted
and poorly refereed scare stories."
The claim that the US-led invasion of Iraq had triggered a slaughter of almost
Rwandan proportions was a gross and outlandish exaggeration; it should have
been greeted with extreme skepticism. But because it served the interests of
those eager to discredit the war as a moral catastrophe, common-sense standards
were ignored. "In our view," the Baltimore Sun editorialized, "the Hopkins
study stands until someone knocks it down."
Now someone has, devastatingly. But will the debunking be trumpeted as loudly
and clearly as the original report? Don't hold your breath.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
Jeff Jacoby Archives
© 2006, Boston Globe
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K