March 5, 2014
Netanyahu's inaction to Obama's provocations sends powerful message
Kerry, after apparent criticism by Schumer, seeks to allay skepticism on diplomacy
How to ruin a perfectly good kid in 10 simple steps
2014 Oscars played it safe, but was faith lost in the shuffle?
Apple joins Hobby Lobby in touting corporate values beyond profit
March 3, 2014
Alina Dain Sharon: In the Hebrew calendar, a leap year has extra month, not day
Latest Obama appointment to prove Prez set on emasculating so-called Israel Lobby
Jewish World Review
Jan. 12, 2006
/ 12 Teves, 5766
Katrina and consequences
An e-mail that showed up in my inbox the other day contained a photograph of the modern floodgates that keep Venice from
being inundated by the Adriatic Sea. Below it was a picture of Holland's high-tech dams, which rise as much as 40 feet above the
waves that perpetually threaten the Dutch. A third photo showed London's futuristic-looking flood barriers, a series of
semicircular silver gates along the Thames that can be raised or lowered as needed to regulate tidal heaves surging up from the
Following these images of impressive European flood control technology came a picture from New Orleans. It showed a
section of a broken, low-tech, decidedly unimpressive concrete levee surrounded by water, presumably taken in the wake of
Hurricane Katrina. Sneered an accompanying message: "Way to go, Corps of Engineers!"
Whether it is fair to compare New Orleans's flood-control system with Europe's, or whether those European barriers are as
effective as they are photogenic, I don't have the expertise to judge. Nonetheless, that e-mail is a good reminder of a key truth
about the Katrina disaster: It was mostly the result of government failure.
The flooding that devastated New Orleans was caused not by Mother Nature but by defective infrastructure infrastructure
built and operated by the federal government, such as the now-infamous 17th Street Canal levee. When the Army Corps of
Engineers designed that levee, it made critical mistakes. It badly underestimated soil strength, for example, which led to the use of
sheet pilings that were too flimsy, resulting in floodwalls unable to withstand the water Katrina hurled toward the city.
Worse, the "obviously faulty designs," as the New Orleans Times-Picayune termed them on Dec. 30, were flagged during a
design review by the Corps of Engineers' regional office, which ordered the engineers in New Orleans to correct their plans. But
they didn't. When the chief engineer in New Orleans balked, the Times-Picayune found, "his superiors dropped the issue."
Compounding that structural weakness was the dreadfully misguided Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, a 76-mile long manmade
river created by the federal government 40 years ago to speed navigation. For decades, critics warned that the canal was a flood
disaster waiting to happen a giant "funnel" that would accelerate and intensify any storm surge headed toward the New Orleans
levees. Sure enough, when Katrina hit, the canal greatly magnified the height and speed of the wall of water that slammed into the
levees. Entire sections of the wall gave way, leading to the destruction of a major American city. And all of it made possible by
your tax dollars at work.
Could such appalling errors ever occur in the private sector? Of course they could, and had the New Orleans levee system
been in private hands, there is no guarantee that Katrina wouldn't have proved just as catastrophic. But failure would have had
consequences financial reverses, firings, loss of market share, costly lawsuits. A private corporation whose incompetence leads
to dire results can expect to pay a price for its bungling, but there is no market discipline in the public sector, where dissatisfied
"customers" better known as taxpayers generally cannot take their business elsewhere or refuse to keep paying.
If levees are to be built, says Walter Block, an economist at Loyola University of New Orleans, the job should be carried out
"by an economic entity that can lose funding, and thus put its very existence at risk if it errs. This can only apply to the market
never the state." But neither the Corps of Engineers nor any other government agency is about to lose its funding, or face any
penalty. On the contrary, they will be rewarded with even more money and authority the government's usual response to its
Indeed, in the aftermath of Katrina plenty of voices clamor for more government and more central planning from Ted
Kennedy's call for a new, Cabinet-level Gulf Coast Redevelopment Authority to the USA Today editorial wishing New Orleans
had "a singular vision of how to rebuild and a take-charge leader." For his part, President Bush more or less announced that the
hurrican recovery process would be governed by fiscal indiscipline. "It's going to cost whatever it costs," he said, when asked if
the administration's plans didn't amount to "writing a blank check." An AP headline summed up the prevailing attitude: "Katrina
Ushers in Return of Big Government."
And how is big government handling things, post-Katrina? Well, the New York Times reports that in those Louisiana
communities that hired private contractors to clear away the debris left by the storm, 70 percent of the cleanup is complete. In
those that are relying on the Army Corps of Engineers, the job is only 45 percent done. Biloxi, Miss., which turned to private
operators, now has "whole neighborhoods . . . primed for new development. But in Pascagoula, 25 miles east, only about 25
residential lots have been cleared."
Pascagoula's cleanup, it probably goes without saying, is being handled by the feds.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
Jeff Jacoby Archives
© 2006, Boston Globe