March 5, 2014
Netanyahu's inaction to Obama's provocations sends powerful message
Kerry, after apparent criticism by Schumer, seeks to allay skepticism on diplomacy
How to ruin a perfectly good kid in 10 simple steps
2014 Oscars played it safe, but was faith lost in the shuffle?
Apple joins Hobby Lobby in touting corporate values beyond profit
March 3, 2014
Alina Dain Sharon: In the Hebrew calendar, a leap year has extra month, not day
Latest Obama appointment to prove Prez set on emasculating so-called Israel Lobby
Jewish World Review
March 23, 2006
/ 23 Adar, 5766
Message to Tony Blair: Don't let the wobblies get you down
The Economist, Britain's venerable weekly news
magazine, has called on Prime Minister Tony Blair to resign. The magazine's
political leaning in the United Kingdom is to the right of the newsweeklies
in the United States. In fact, the Economist's political position is right
of center, though it is very fastidious about the positions it takes.
Reading it is somewhat like reading the official voice of the Vatican,
though with none of the puckish humor of L'Osservatore Romano. At any rate,
I read the Economist regularly and enjoy it, but calling on Blair to resign
strikes me as a publicity stunt, except that the editors of the Economist
see themselves as above such opportunism, much as the Pope sees himself as
above such opportunism.
Blair has said that he intends to resign before the next British
election. The ritualistic leftists in his Labour Party have been putting
pressure on him to resign the sooner, the better. Now the fastidious
right has moved in to increase the pressure on Blair. Think of it. This
brave and farsighted man who told all Europe that the enemy was coming is
asked to resign even though the enemy has struck and he has been vindicated.
He summoned the forces worldwide to repel the brutes and he is succeeding.
The man who, with the Coalition of the Willing. is whipping the New Nazis,
the Islamofascists, in two countries, is prevailed upon by some of his
fellow citizens to give up his post before the job is done. And if he does,
who will take over as prime minister, Neville Chamberlain?
With the Economist's editors assuming this preposterous
position, let me assume at least an equally impudent position. As the editor
in chief of The American Spectator I call upon Blair to finish his
premiership and resign only after he has handed authority over to a
functioning Iraqi government with the Iraqi military pacifying its country.
Frankly, I admire Blair as one of the rarest of politicians. He is a man who
has taken chances on behalf of principles, principles that are at once sound
and require resolve to defend. In this case the principle is defending
civilized values against barbarism.
Today, those who have read about the brave handful of Europeans
who in the 1930s defied appeasement and Nazism think of the appeasers as the
anomaly. Actually the appeasers are the norm among politicians. The Blairs
and the Churchills are the anomaly. The politicians who confect
sophistications for ducking the responsibilities of power are all around us
and always have been. Their arguments are very appealing if one can banish
from mind the ghastly brutality of the Islamofascist brutes who kill
defenseless citizens first in their war to impose nihilism on the world. Or
do you think that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Osama bin Laden will be satisfied
once we all live as good Muslims? Then off to their prayer rugs the pious
Zarqawi and bin Laden will go, never to lose their tempers again.
Blair understands the challenge to the West. In the Labour
Party, a party not known for its ardor to defend the West against such
barbarous forces as the Nazis and the Communists, he stood out, took
chances, and directed his party and his country to defend the West. He even
stood out and directed his party away from the antique class-warfare of
socialism. He modernized it and kept Britain competitive in the
modern-market economy. The immediate reward was prosperity for Britain and
victory at the polls for Labour.
Now forces in his country are scheming to remove him from the
stage. Well, let the Economist stand with the defeatists. Over on this side
of the Atlantic The American Spectator calls on Blair to stay at Number 10
and finish the job. I never would have thought a Labour leader could do so
much for Britain and the West. He showed his mettle on Kosovo when the
majority of Europeans again ducked their responsibility to humanity. Blair
recognized Slobodan Milosevic for the butcher that he was. He was staunch in
removing the Taliban from Afghanistan, and he did not flinch in staring down
Hussein. Blair is the kind of leader Britain's Tory Party should have
produced. I still have my disagreements with him, but he has amazed me. He
puts principle before party.
In the first of three speeches he is scheduled to deliver on the
threat against us he said this week, "This is not a clash between
civilizations, but a clash about civilization. It is the age-old battle
between progress and reaction." Strangely this speech was not widely
reported in America. It seems to be part of a counterattack by the leaders
of the Coalition of the Willing against the defeatists. President George W.
Bush is sounding similar notes in public appearances. Their rhetorical
offensive is just another war story the press has missed.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Bob Tyrrell is editor in chief of The American Spectator. Comment by clicking here.
© 2006, Creators Syndicate