|
Jewish World Review / Nov. 26, 1998 /7 Kislev, 5759
MUGGER
Starr’s Magnificent Moment
FRIDAY MORNING, with the Starr testimony in full swing, I was speaking with David Tell, one of
the country’s most accomplished intellectuals, and I ventured that perhaps Starr’s levelheaded and cool testimony would
buck up wimpy Republicans to at least vote for impeachment that
would then go to a doomed Senate trial.
Tell was not optimistic. He,
like myself, can’t understand why the nation is so sanguine about a
president who’s perjured himself and clearly obstructed justice. But
that’s what passes for political culture today: As long as a voter’s
pocket bulges it’s okay for the president -- the president! -- to lie, but not
a prosecutor to bring him to justice.
But the crowning moment of the night came at the conclusion of GOP
majority counsel David Schippers' questioning of Starr. Schippers, who’s
clearly disgusted with the unfair tarring of Starr as a sex-crazed
second coming of Joseph McCarthy, began this exchange:
Schippers: "You have been given a duty that you did not seek and you’ve
performed that duty to the best of your ability. Is that correct, sir?"
Starr: "Ive certainly tried, and I did not -- to do it to the best of my
ability, and I’m proud of what we have been able to accomplish. As I
indicated earlier, the records of convictions obtained but also the
decisions not to seek an indictment, the decision to issue thorough
reports, all that is part of what we have co-labored together, with Mr.
Kendall pointing to the number of persons involved in the investigation.
I’m proud of those persons. They’re my colleagues and they have become
my friends, and they’ve worked very long and very hard under very
difficult circumstances, and recognizing --- and we’re big, big boys, and I
mean that in a gender-neutral way."
Schippers: "And that has" ---
Starr: "So when we were accused in Arkansas of a political witch hunt,
we took it and we did our arguing in court and proved to the
satisfaction of a fair-minded jury with a very distinguished judge that
the sitting governor and the president of the first lady’s business
partners were guilty of serious felonies. And we had been listening
month after month to ‘It’s a political witch hunt.’ And that was unfair,
but we learned that goes with this territory."
Schippers: "And Judge, for all that, doing your duty, you’ve been
pilloried and attacked from all sides. Is that right?"
Starr: "I would hope not all sides, but I guess that’s" ---
Schippers: "Sometimes it seems like all sides."
Starr: (Laughs.)
Schippers: "How long have you been an attorney, Judge Starr?"
Starr: "Twenty-five years."
Schippers: "Well, I’ve been an attorney for almost 40 years. I want to
say that I’m proud to be in the same room with you and your staff."
Whereupon Starr got a standing ovation from the Republicans, and perhaps
for the first time in his 12-hour appearance, flashed a well-deserved
grin. It was a happy moment for me and supporters of the maligned
prosecutor. A good person, a devoted family man, Starr finally had the
chance to briefly bask in a bit of the adulation that Clinton craves on
an hourly basis.
I wasn’t dewy-eyed, but I went to bed thinking this was
a minor victory. Schippers' comments were a display of common sense;
that no matter the outcome of the impeachment inquiry, in fact, Starr’s
entire investigation, this exchange should go down in history as one
shining moment in the whole depressing affair.
Buchanan
was succinct: "Under Starr’s relentless recital of facts and the law,
Clinton defenders were beaten back into their last ditch: Even if Bill
Clinton committed perjury, obstructed justice and lied to a grand jury,
his felonies do not rise to the level of impeachable offenses.
"Though a college president would be fired in disgrace for Clinton’s
crimes, a trial lawyer would be disbarred, and a general in the armed
forces would be court-martialed and sent to Leavenworth, Clinton must be
given a pass and allowed to serve out his term."
The smarmy Rich, ebullient that most tv stations decided not to air
Starr’s testimony, tried and failed to employ a technique that’s he’s
never been able to muster, maybe even define: irony.
He wrote: "But none
of the Three Big networks aired so much as a minute of [the hearings]
live. By this point, as the Times' Jill Abramson observed, Mr. Starr had
failed to match the star power of John Dean, Oliver North or Clarence
Thomas."
Rich must’ve broken out in a rash just keystroking "Clarence Thomas,"
another upstanding man who’s been trashed by the likes of Broadway
Frank.
"Among other miscalculations, the independent counsel didn’t
realize that the very words 'Morgan Guaranty' put the nation (and
visibly yawning Congressmen) to sleep. Or that his own report had hit
the best-seller list not because of its constitutional arguments but
because of its vivid descriptions of oral sex that, as he so
painstakingly noted, did not reach 'completion.' If Mr. Starr was going
to abstain from sex at this late date, then of course America [and Rich]
was going to change the channel to 'The Young and the Restless.' New
sex, even old sex, was the only hope of propping up a hearing with no
new information, no new rhetoric, no changes of heart in any camp and no
compelling new characters."
Fine. Rich was bored by Starr's testimony. He was more concerned about
the testimony as performance, instead of a calm recitation of the crimes
that the President of the United States had committed, sullying the
Constitution in the process. What a sad sack and embarrassment to what
was once considered the country’s Paper of Record. As for Starr’s report
hitting the bestseller list, that’s laughable, as Rich knows. Starr
didn’t release it to make money, you partisan loser. It says something
that a columnist for The New York Times thinks it’s okay for the
President to lie, under oath, because it’s "just about sex."
What a
lesson to today’s youth; what an indictment of Rich's warped values.
Pure poetry, Mr. Nyhan, and a fact that even
first-graders in this jaded country already know. He also spins the line
so popular with the mainstream press that because the public is against
impeachment, then the Constitution has no relevance. I can’t wait: In
four years, say, when George W. Bush assassinates Saddam Hussein,
without Congress' approval, it'll be Nyhan who’ll lead the charge for
impeachment.
But the silliest part of Nyhan’s defense of Clinton was his
introduction: "If the Republicans had put Kenneth Starr on national TV
for two hours before the last election, the Democrats could have carried
Canada."
Don’t know about you, but I’m still howling.
"Earth to Ken:
Life is not a bar exam. Abstruse asides about ethereal concepts such as
‘inchoate criminality’ were sprinkled throughout the case Starr
presented. Is Starr the only man in America who doesn’t understand why a
shifty gent with a roving eye would prefer not to be unmasked as a horny
hubbie groping a more-than-willing female subordinate?"
If a conservative columnist had written those last words he’d be running
from a vigilante squad comprised of Gloria Steinem, Eric Boehlert,
Barbra Streisand, Maxine Waters and Katha Pollitt, ready to cut his nuts
off for such sexist remarks.
I prefer the comments of Wesley Pruden, editor of the Washington Times,
enlightening us about the conduct of virtuous Democrats: "Barney Frank,
the great moral exemplar from the precincts of the Massachusetts witch
burners and slave traders, was beside himself most of the day,
spluttering contrived rage and spraying real spittle on his papers (and
his neighbors) with objections, excuses and points of order beyond
number. John Conyers, obsessed with the subject as only a man haunted by
memories of used-to-be and surrounded by nubile young women can be,
wanted to talk only about sex. Jerrold Nadler, the thousand-pound
balloon from the Macy’s Christmas parade, looked about to burst, pumped
up with unction and self-righteousness."
Finally, The Weekly Standard’s Andrew Ferguson, chatting with
Massachusetts Democrat Marty Meehan at a break, found out from the
Congressman that the minority party really wants a punishment meted out
to Clinton, but if the Republicans insist on pursuing the impeachment
hearings, that won’t happen. As Ferguson notes, it’ll be the GOP’s fault
if Clinton gets off without even a
The night before, watching Clinton lawyer David Kendall, a dyspeptic
barrister who deserves to be disbarred, spar with Starr and not scoring
one solid hit, I thought at least this was a moment to remember. When
Kendall asked Starr if his team had ever hired private investigators,
the independent counsel replied, "No, we have never hired Terry Lenzner,
David," referring to the gumshoe who dug up so much dirt for Clinton and
his "war room" on the President’s enemies.
Starr's moment of truth
On Saturday, Pat Buchanan and Frank Rich gave their opinions of Starr’s
testimony. Not surprisingly, Buchanan made a lot more sense than the
screwy Rich, an imbecile who should be fired from the Times for his
crummy writing and made to do penance, under Sidney Blumenthal’s
tutelage, at the Clinton White House. Maybe he could be the
concessionaire at the First Liar’s frequent movie screenings.
Buchanan
Travel north, to Boston, and read what Globe subscribers got from
columnist David Nyhan on Nov. 20. Nyhan, whose faded bumpersticker,
"Don’t Blame Me, I’m from Massachusetts," has probably been transferred
to each car he buys, tells readers that "Starr is no match for Clinton
as a TV performer."
Nyhan
JWR contributor "Mugger" is the editor-in-chief and publisher of New York Press. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
11/18/98: Who could have imagined!?
11/11/98: Send Dowd Down to the Minors
11/05/98:
Feeding Gore to
a shark named Bush
10/30/98: "Pope" Jann and his rappers speak ---it's time for fun again
10/28/98: Lowered expectations, but the GOP holds the cards
10/23/98: Speaking from Zabar’s: Michael Moore!
10/21/98: Bubba redux?
His uptick won't last
10/16/98: Gore for President: The Bread Lines Are Starting to Form