Jewish World Review Oct. 8, 1999/28 Tishrei, 5760
http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- LET’S RETURN to the Beltway media fan club of John McCain, whose numbers, impossible though it may seem, probably top the throng of adolescents who would kill to give Leonardo DiCaprio head. What’s pathetic about the McCain idolatry is that liberals (some of whom know in their heart that Bill Clinton is a dreadful man and possibly a traitor) are trying to redeem themselves with a Republican whose spikier policies are Democratic.
First, a few excerpts. Charles Lane, recently deposed editor of The New Republic, wrote: “I know it shouldn’t be happening. But it is: I’m falling for John McCain... My family and friends [and apparently TNR owner Marty Peretz, gone bonkers as his protege Al Gore melts down, thus losing Marty his dreamed-of position in the kitchen cabinet] might disown me for succumbing, even tentatively, to the allure of a Republican, and a pretty conservative one at that. But the guy is running such a terrific campaign, speaking so forthrightly about so many matters of real substance, that I just find him irresistible.”
Abe Rosenthal, in the Sept. 24 New York Times: “Given his life and nature, Senator McCain probably doesn’t think his attempt to free his party from Buchanan is particularly brave. It wasn’t, except among Republican candidates. But Senator McCain’s comments had the perfect pitch of political goodness and decency. We owe him thanks and an embrace for reminding us what they are like.”
Richard Bernstein, in a Oct. 1 Times book review (he pegs McCain’s imprisonment at seven years): “Still, McCain’s description of what he and his fellow prisoners endured is gritty and moving. He shows admirable restraint here. He tells us about being regularly beaten or of having his arms roped and pulled behind him and left that way overnight, but he does not ask us to share his pain.”
Funny, but it seems that’s exactly what McCain is asking: share my pain. Why else would he publish a book, which could have been written anytime after his release since the narrative ends before his political career started, during his presidential campaign?
Slate’s Jacob Weisberg, admittedly a smart man who simply chose the wrong occupation, is beyond the pale in his sheeplike writing about the ethically challenged McCain.
(Why has the Senator’s involvement in the Keating Five scandal been mentioned so infrequently this year? Seems to me that this relatively recent misuse of power is far more important than whether George Bush snorted cocaine a generation ago, as a private citizen.)
Please. Most Americans don’t vote, except the elderly who still feel it’s part of their duty as citizens. Does Weisberg really think that McCain’s ludicrous campaign finance reform proposal, which will never be enacted, will lure young men and women to the polls on Election Day? Uh, no.
Weisberg continues: “McCain has not yet managed to communicate his charisma in public, or to the young, in anything like the way John F. Kennedy once did. But his ‘new patriotic challenge’ seems to strike a chord nonetheless.” Why, Jake? Because you and 200 other sycophantic political reporters get off on McCain’s off-color jokes when you’re having a beer with him in a New Hampshire hotel?
Roger Simon, in the Sept. 27 U.S. News & World Report: “John McCain wiggles around in the seat, leans the back of his head against the window of the bus, whips out a pair of dark, happenin’ sunglasses that make him look like Sen. Blues Brother...”
Ultraliberal Bill Press and conservative Mary Matalin were like fawning schoolgirls after interviewing McCain on the Sept. 13 edition of Crossfire.
Matalin: “Are you ever not inspired by John McCain? That he’s setting new rules for politics? He doesn’t attack anybody. You’re just for him or you’re against him—simple as that. He’s an American hero.”
Press: “I agree with that. I have one thing to say: Please, please don’t make John McCain the nominee of the Republican Party. That’s all I ask. He’s refreshing. He’s gutsy. He’s independent. He makes George W. Bush look like yesterday’s newspaper. And you—you’re not smart enough to nominate him.”
Peter Kann, The Wall Street Journal’s publisher, concluded a book review of Faith of My Fathers by saying, “John McCain, in this or any other political season, stands as an oak among saplings.”
Never underestimate The Boston Globe’s hack pundit David Nyhan for supplying a doozy of a quote. He wrote on Sept. 24: “And that is the best reason why the 99.6 percent of Americans who do not live in New Hampshire should begin to pay attention to the Captain Dauntless of the Republican field. You want to clean up politics, then Crash McCain is your New Hampshire man. Even Democrats should write him a check.”
And always count on Time’s Margaret Carlson to agree with her friends on the DC cocktail circuit. In her Oct. 11 column, while savaging Bush as a daddy’s boy, she lavished praise on McCain: “McCain is no saint (he will tick off the reasons he isn’t, if you don’t beg him to stop), but he is the natural, solid alternative should there be second thoughts about Bush’s preemptive coronation. Many people at the rally in Nashua clutched McCain’s book and approached him for his signature with something like reverence. One man carefully removed his copy from a Ziploc bag to get the Senator’s autograph, then carefully tucked it back in the bag. He didn’t want any smudges or dog-eared pages. It’s not a coffee-table book, but that’s where he planned to display it.”
You have to wonder. If there’s all this “reverence” for McCain, why does he attain only single digits in most polls for the GOP nomination? Why has he raised so little money? Why haven’t more of his colleagues, in utter awe of his “story,” rushed out to endorse him instead of the “callow” Bush? Maybe because members of Congress know McCain in a way reporters don’t. Chew on that.
A few points: Hunt was a steadfast defender of the Clinton administration, through all its dishonesty, sleazy surveillance of innocent citizens and unprecedented illegal means of political fundraising. Second, McCain is a shrewd pol, not the aw-shucks “guy” that reporters crack up at, and is cynically trying to exploit, without much luck if you look at the polls outside Washington newsrooms, his POW history. In Arizona he’s considered a shady businessman, with a questionable personal life, who even lost the endorsement of the state’s governor, Jane Hull, to Bush. Third, leaving aside my two sons, I wouldn’t want their Beanie Babies to “emulate” McCain.
I asked Amy Silverman, a Phoenix New Times reporter who’s covered McCain for years, her reaction to the Senator’s precious status within the Beltway. She replied: “John McCain is a politician. The fact that he poses as a maverick…makes it even worse. I’m horrified by the way that he’s used his POW status to garner favor. He’s done it for years, but it’s gotten much worse in recent months. McCain is a master at milking his war hero story for all it’s worth. He manages to do it in a way that allows him to emerge as humble, by having others tell the story for him. Using his [Vietnam experience] as his base point, McCain has been able to position himself as a maverick on issues like campaign finance reform, tobacco, gun rights, etc.
“He postures as a progressive on subjects that he took the opposite stand on relatively recently. In the 80s, before the Keating Five scandal, he repeatedly voted against campaign finance reform measures in the Senate. He used to take tobacco money. Ditto for NRA money.
Furthermore, the measures he supports today—like the tobacco and campaign finance reform bills—are almost assured of failure. So he get points as a renegade and sucks up to the Beltway crowd, without having to do anything. It all comes back to his hero status: who wants to trash a guy who was beaten and mistreated by the gooks for almost six years.
Finally, McCain gets sucked up to because he does his own share of sucking. He lets reporters feel special, like he’s being extraordinarily candid for them, giving them extra access. It’s all part of his shtick.”
Nashville: A DC Outpost For Gore
A friend of mine suggested that Al Gore’s yearlong implosion is so disastrous that he might drop out of the Democratic presidential race by New Year’s Day. Hyperbole, sure, but the odds on Bill Bradley taking the nomination are certainly better than 50 percent right now, despite what national magazines and newspapers might say.
(For example, the clueless Newsweek, in its Oct. 11 issue, commissioned a poll matching up Gore and George W. Bush, and then added in Pat Buchanan as a third-party candidate. Bush won in both faceoffs, but the telling point is that Bradley wasn’t even included.)
Gore’s announcement last week that he was moving his political operations to Nashville so that he could traipse around Kmarts, looking for the soul of America, was such an obvious gimmick that even the most naive political reporters had to laugh. The best line of the week goes to CNN’s Tucker Carlson who, appearing on Larry King Live last Wednesday
But later in the week, it was apparent that Coelho, just one of Gore’s many personnel mistakes, had bigger problems than finding a tony restaurant in Nashville. Last year, as the commissioner general for the United States pavilion at the World Exposition in Portugal, Gore’s campaign chairman, according to Sunday’s Washington Post, was on the take. “A report by the Office of Inspector General cites improper use of free airline tickets, luxury cars and apartments provided for the taxpayer-funded exposition; the hiring of Coelho’s niece and of two stepsons of Ambassador to Portugal Gerald McGowan; and approval of excessive payments on contracts.”
Like pollster Mark Penn, it’s just a matter of days, possibly a week, before Coelho is shown the door. Naturally, Gore’s first instinct was to defend his historically corrupt friend. On Face the Nation last Sunday, Gore, dismissing the charges as “inside baseball,” said: “I haven’t seen this report, but I know him, and he is going to continue doing the terrific job he’s been doing as my campaign chair.” As if Gore needs more trouble, a new poll in his quasi-native Tennessee shows him running behind Gov. Bush by 51-42 percent.
Okay. If Gore loses Carville, the only supporter he’ll have left is Tipper, the stand-in drummer for the makeshift Grateful Dead.
Gore sucked in both Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter and the Times’ Bob Herbert during interviews last week. Displaying his new down-home makeover, he regaled both with a quote from Kris Kristofferson’s “Me and Bobby McGee.” Alter’s version: “Gore: ‘In the words of Janis Joplin, freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose.’” Herbert wrote on Monday: “He quoted Janis Joplin: ‘Freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose.’” Didn’t either of these genius journalists, or their factcheckers, realize that Joplin didn’t write the damn song?
Bill Clinton, who’s sabotaged Gore’s campaign at regular intervals—comparing him to Nixon, getting publicly steamed when Gore belatedly criticized his affair with Monica Lewinsky, calling a Times reporter to give tips on the campaign—was at it again last Friday in a speech before a Democratic National Committee meeting. “This is not an election yet,” Clinton told his audience. “I mean, the election may be going on in the newspapers every day, but here, in the minds of the American people, they still think we should be drawing a paycheck to work for them.” This, of course, is preposterous. The primaries will essentially be over in March; Gore has changed the direction of his campaign so many times, always for the worse, that he’s beginning to look like a longshot for the Democratic nod. Yeah, he’s locked up all those establishment “super-delegates,” but they can change allegiance at any time.
And, if you believe The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, a stretch I know, Clinton is at it again. In the current edition of the weekly, Mayer writes: “In a recent conversation, President Clinton suggested to a confidant that the only reason Gore ever sought the Presidency was to please his father, Tennessee’s Senator Al Gore, Sr., who died last year.
‘The President,’ this friend says, thinks that ‘a lot of Gore’s baggage is his father.’” Man, when the moxie genes were handed out, Clinton went back for fifth helpings. What nerve he has to talk about the late Senator’s “baggage” when it’s his own that’s killing Gore.
Clinton is not a rational man and that may explain why he wants Gore to
lose. He’s so self-absorbed, he’d rather have a Republican in the White
House than Gore be proven a better president. As for the Vice President,
he stands for nothing and therefore only people who have
patronage/transactional reasons to be for him are for him. Now, if Gore
had a lick of moonshine sense, he’d have resigned his office on
principle last year, at the height of the Lewinsky scandal, setting him
apart from all the rest of Clinton’s entourage who disgracefully let
their boss lie to them and still remained at the White House. Talk about
integrity! He’d be at least even in the polls right now with Gov. Bush;
Bradley wouldn’t even matter. Instead, Gore, on the day of Clinton’s
deserved impeachment, said his boss would be remembered as one of the
greatest American presidents. That’s a sound bite we’ll be seeing in GOP
commercials from March of next year till Election