Dec. 11, 2013
CIA's anti-terrorism NOC effort called 'colossal flop'
John Wilkinson, M.D.
: Mayo Clinic Medical Edge: Mild leg swelling could be signaling other medical issues
: In Windy City, religion confronts a gust of cold air
Dec. 2, 2013
Rabbi Moshe Grylak: Attack on Chanukah's scholar-warriors an affront to all people of faith
U.S. boxes in Israel, not Iran: Surrender in Geneva
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom
: Vanessa Bayer & Jacob, the Bar Mitzvah Boy; Adam Levine, nickname "the Bear Jew," is People's Sexiest; Eastwoods Need to Say "Kinehora!"
The Kosher Gourmet by Kim Ode:
Fried and gone to heaven: Dense, fried Slovenian doughnut-like rolls, krofi, on Chanukah is a treat you'll want to eat all year long
: Tracking babies' eyes, scientists find signs of autism in 2-month-olds
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom
: Hunger Games: Jewish Connections; A 'Minyan'of Jewish Celebs Recite the Gettysburg Address On-line; Walter Matthau's Reaction to JFK's Death
Nancy A. Youssef :
Christians too afraid to complain as treatment in new 'democracy' worsens
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom
: Jewish MLB managers; Past and Present; Movie News and Dancing W/the Stars Shocker; Paula Abdul's Israeli bat mitzvah and bio facts rarely reported
Jewish World Review
August 16, 2013/ 10 Elul, 5773
Whatever happened to 'It takes a village'?
As a young woman new to the world of work and loving it, I actually went through a phase in which I hoped I would not be able to bear children.
I've written before about my ambivalence about having a family -- before I had four children, of course. Yet I'm not sure I've shared that little tidbit!
But yes, there was a time when I thought about the "advantage" of being childless being decided (begin ital) for (end ital) me. Deciding on that course myself? Not an option. Even then, I had a sense that having children was a calling about more than me.
Fast forward to Time magazine's provocative cover story on the dramatic rise in people in the U.S. choosing to be childless. "Child-free," as it is called. The fallout has been strong, with much of it centered around a new culture war over "to have children/not have children." Who is right? Which way is better? Who is being more selfish?
But the most interesting stream of response to the Time piece has not been different folks making their case for their lifestyle. But rather, the argument that the decision about childbearing, whether one has children at all, is a completely private one.
Really? Whatever happened to "It takes a village"? Does the involvement in the village ensue only after the private decision to have children has been made? Or should the village have a stake in that decision, too?
Yes, I wrote a book called "It Takes a Parent," arguing that it's parents who are primarily responsible for raising their children, and this is how it ought to be. But I do make the case for "the village," and always have, in the sense that our actions are interconnected, and morally intertwined. So when my first marriage ended in (my unwanted) divorce, it didn't just impact my four young children. It had a profound impact on our community -- on the kids down the street, on the kids living on the street we moved to, and on it went.
One of the reasons marriage has fallen apart in our culture is because, today, people think of it as being privatized, thoroughly decoupled from any larger obligation to the culture around us. These days, marriage, according to society's rules, is only about my spouse and me and what we want marriage to be, or don't want it to be. It is cut off from the fabric of community needed to support it.
Likewise, we are privatizing decisions about childbearing. Historically, having children, if one could, was simply assumed. Now, not having them is a choice on a very complicated new menu that has never existed before. And that, too, has consequences for the community.
If someone doesn't want to have kids, well, obviously I'm not going to step in and make them, or even try to change their minds, or argue that no one is really ready to be a parent before they are a parent.
But when record rates of people -- even if still very much in the minority -- are making the choice to be child-free, I'm sure going to ask, "Where does that movement come from, and how does it impact the children who are already here?"
I think we've gotten to a lamentable place in the West, with a perfect storm of independent (versus interdependent) lives, a focus on self-actualization and personal satisfaction, a sexual revolution coupled with reliable birth control, all of which have fundamentally shifted our thinking. It used to be that we understood that part of our role as human beings was to create and develop the generation that would replace us and carry on community and civilization itself.
Our grandparents, for instance, didn't agonize about when to start their families -- or whether to have kids in the first place. Not just because they (begin ital) couldn't (end ital) very effectively, until the 1960s and the birth-control pill, but because they (begin ital) wouldn't (end ital). It wasn't the way they thought about the world.
It has taken generational shifts, not just reliable birth control, to privatize the decision about whether to have children at all.
It seems to me that this trend is, more than anything else, a symptom of a larger problem: A disappearing village. And even a child can see that this has consequences for all of us.
if (strpos(, "printer_friendly") === 0)
=<<Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
|BUY THE E-BOOK FOR $0.99|
Click HERE to purchase it. (Sales help fund JWR.).
JWR contributor Betsy Hart, a frequent commentator on CNN and the Fox News Channel, can be reached by clicking here.
Betsy Hart Archives
© 2012, Scripps Howard News Servic
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
David Ray Skinner
Ask Doctor K