March 5, 2014
Netanyahu's inaction to Obama's provocations sends powerful message
Kerry, after apparent criticism by Schumer, seeks to allay skepticism on diplomacy
How to ruin a perfectly good kid in 10 simple steps
2014 Oscars played it safe, but was faith lost in the shuffle?
Apple joins Hobby Lobby in touting corporate values beyond profit
March 3, 2014
Alina Dain Sharon: In the Hebrew calendar, a leap year has extra month, not day
Latest Obama appointment to prove Prez set on emasculating so-called Israel Lobby
Jewish World Review
Jan. 8, 2010
22 Teves 5770
When War Is Not Metaphor
My dinner partner at the holiday table was home on leave from Army
Ranger training. He had been living outdoors, learning to be at home in
the rain and the mud, eating to lose weight and build muscle through
rigorous sleep-deprived maneuvers. He could run, jump and do push-ups in
numbers that would embarrass the regulars at the local gym who pump iron
and swim their laps in the comfort of indoor luxury.
He was looking forward to deploying to Afghanistan. I wasn't sure I
heard him right, so I asked him to repeat himself. Yes, he was looking
forward to deploying to Afghanistan.
He had been an ROTC cadet at one of our elite Eastern universities. He
was sure that none from his class could be happier than he was. He
wanted to be an Army Ranger because it would give his life meaning and
purpose. He wasn't sure many of his classmates in other professions
would say that. He wanted a part of ensuring the future of his country.
With neither sentiment nor arrogance, he talked of taking seriously the
defense of country. He regards al-Qaida-trained terrorists as a deep
and lethal threat to everything he holds dear. He was very matter of
fact, and it was I who waxed sentimental, imagining him listening to
Kate Smith sing "God Bless America." She was the lyrical voice of
patriotism during World War II and made Irving Berlin's song a new
battle hymn of the republic.
We don't have a Kate Smith today. Our showbiz celebrities act as if they
don't know there's a war on. They're more concerned with acting
outrageous than honoring the courageous. They no longer bother to give
lip service to the values of God and country, and yet we face enemies as
deadly and as determined as any we fought 70 years ago. The enemy today
hides in caves, covens and cells but is just as real as the Nazis who
set out to rule the world. They wear neither uniform nor identifiable
insignia, and sometimes designer suits as camouflage. But their goal is
as evil as the goals of Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan.
President Obama observed the obvious in accepting the Nobel Peace Prize,
but it was a needed reminder: "Evil does exist in the world. A
nonviolent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations
cannot convince al-Qaida's leader to lay down their arms." He reminded
his Norwegian hosts that many of their countrymen feel "deep ambivalence
about military action today."
What he didn't talk about was the deep ambivalence many Americans as
well feel toward military action. It's those ambivalent Americans the
president yielded to in granting the Christmas Day bomber a civil rather
than a military trial. Why the man with explosives in his underwear
should be dealt with differently than, say, the eight Nazi saboteurs who
arrived on the Atlantic shore in 1942 with explosives in a suitcase is a
puzzle. They got their day in a military court, and though they never
managed to detonate a single bomb, six were executed in the electric
chair, one was sentenced to life in prison and the other was sentenced
to 30 years.
Some of our most squeamish citizens cannot grasp the reality that the
war on terror is not metaphor, that neither a saboteur nor a terrorist
is entitled to the rights of a common criminal. Their arguments are weak
"We have nothing to be ashamed of, little to fear and much to be proud
of treating captured foreign terrorists as we would treat any upstanding
American who tried to blow up an airplane full of people," writes
Michael Kinsley in The New York Times.
Such reasoning is easy for those who intend no sacrifice, and patently
absurd. There's a huge difference, obvious to most of us, between a
domestic shooter serving his own ends and a terrorist recruited in the
Third World, radicalized in London and trained in Yemen to blow up
innocents and spread fear. Our law recognizes such difference, and only
a fancy double-talker would try to equate them.
The desire for this Yemen-trained terrorist to stand trial complicates
the closing of Guantanamo. Almost half of the 200 remaining prisoners in
Guantanamo are from Yemen, and as Thomas Wolfe might put it, they can't
go home again. No other country wants them.
We know now that Yemen recycles terrorists, and those who trained Umar
Farouk Abdulmutallab in his underwear-bomb tactics will cheer him on in
the spotlight of a civilian trial. Ranger, beware.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR contributor Suzanne Fields' column by clicking here.
Suzanne Fields Archives
© 2006, Creators Syndicate, Suzanne Fields