March 5, 2014
Netanyahu's inaction to Obama's provocations sends powerful message
Kerry, after apparent criticism by Schumer, seeks to allay skepticism on diplomacy
How to ruin a perfectly good kid in 10 simple steps
2014 Oscars played it safe, but was faith lost in the shuffle?
Apple joins Hobby Lobby in touting corporate values beyond profit
March 3, 2014
Alina Dain Sharon: In the Hebrew calendar, a leap year has extra month, not day
Latest Obama appointment to prove Prez set on emasculating so-called Israel Lobby
Jewish World Review
Sept. 14, 2006
/ 21 Elul, 5766
If only bin Laden had a stained blue dress ...
If you wonder why it took 50 years to get the truth about Joe McCarthy, consider
the fanatical campaign of the Clinton acolytes to kill an ABC movie that relies on
the 9/11 Commission Report, which whitewashed only 90 percent of Clinton's
cowardice and incompetence in the face of terrorism, rather than 100 percent.
Islamic jihadists attacked America year after year throughout the Clinton
administration. They did everything but blow up his proverbial "bridge to the 21st
century." Every year but one, Clinton found an excuse not to fight back.
The first month Clinton was in office, Islamic terrorists with suspected links to
al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein bombed the World Trade Center.
For the first time ever, a terrorist act against America was treated not as a
matter of national security, but exclusively as a simple criminal offense. The
individual bombers were tried in a criminal court. (The one plotter who got away
fled to Iraq, that peaceful haven of kite-flying children until Bush invaded and
turned it into a nation of dangerous lunatics.)
In 1995 and 1996, various branches of the Religion of Peace al-Qaida, Hezbollah
and the Iranian "Party of God" staged car bomb attacks on American servicemen in
Saudi Arabia, killing 24 members of our military in all. Each time, the Clinton
administration came up with an excuse to do nothing.
Despite the Democrats' current claim that only the capture of Osama bin Laden will
magically end terrorism forever, Clinton turned down Sudan's offer to hand us bin
Laden in 1996. That year, Mohammed Atta proposed the 9/11 attack to bin Laden.
Clinton refused the handover of bin Laden because he said in taped remarks on
Feb. 15, 2002 "(bin Laden) had committed no crime against America, so I did not
bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him." Luckily, after 9/11,
we can get him on that trespassing charge.
Although Clinton made the criminal justice system the entire U.S. counterterrorism
strategy, there was not even an indictment filed after the bombing of either Khobar
Towers (1996) or the USS Cole (2000). Indictments were not filed until after
Bush/Ashcroft came into office.
Only in 1998 did the Clinton-haters ("normal people") force Clinton into a military
response. Solely because of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Clinton finally lobbed a
few bombs in the general direction of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.
In August 1998, three days after Clinton admitted to the nation that he did in fact
have "sex with that woman," he bombed Afghanistan and Sudan, doing about as much
damage as another Clinton fusillade did to a blue Gap dress.
The day of Clinton's scheduled impeachment, Dec. 18, 1998, he bombed Iraq. This
accomplished two things: (1) It delayed his impeachment for one day, and (2) it got
a lot of Democrats on record about the monumental danger of Saddam Hussein and his
weapons of mass destruction.
So don't tell me impeachment "distracted" Clinton from his aggressive pursuit of
terrorists. He never would have bombed anyone if it weren't for the
As soon as Clinton was no longer "distracted" by impeachment, he went right back to
doing nothing in response to terrorism. In October 2000, al-Qaida bombed the USS
Cole, killing 17 sailors and nearly sinking the ship.
Clinton did nothing. This is only an abbreviated list of Clinton's surrender to
Islamic savagery. For a president who supposedly stayed up all night "working" and
hated vacations, Clinton sure spent a lot of time sitting around on his butt while
America was being attacked.
According to Rich Miniter, author of "Losing Bin Laden," Clinton's top national
security advisers made the following classic Democrat excuses for doing nothing in
response to the Cole attack:
- Attorney General Janet Reno "thought retaliation might violate international law
and was therefore against it."
- CIA Director George Tenet "wanted more definitive proof that bin Laden was
behind the attack, although he personally thought he was."
- Secretary of State Madeleine Albright "was concerned about the reaction of world
opinion to a retaliation against Muslims and the impact it would have in the final
days of the Clinton Middle East peace process." (How did that turn out, by the way?
Big success, I take it? Everybody over there all friendly with one another?)
- Secretary of Defense William Cohen "did not consider the Cole attack 'sufficient
provocation' for a military retaliation."
Less than a year after Clinton's final capitulation to Islamic terrorists, they
staged the largest terrorist attack in history on U.S. soil. The Sept. 11 attack,
planning for which began in the '90s, followed eight months of President Bush
but eight years of Bill Clinton.
Clinton's own campaign adviser on Iraq, Laurie Mylroie, says Clinton and his
advisers are "most culpable" for the intelligence failure that allowed 9/11 to
Now, after five years of no terrorist attacks in America, Democrats are hoping
we'll forget the consequences of the Democrat strategy of doing nothing in response
to terrorism and abandon the Bush policies that have kept this nation safe since
9/11. But first, they need to rewrite history.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Ann Coulter is the author of, most recently, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism".
Ann Coulter Archives
BUY ANN'S LATEST
"Godless: The Church of Liberalism"
GODLESS is the most explosive book yet from #1 New York Times bestselling author Ann Coulter. In this completely original and thoroughly controversial work, Coulter writes, "Liberals love to boast that they are not 'religious,' which is what one would expect to hear from the state-sanctioned religion. Of course liberalism is a religion. It has its own cosmology, its own miracles, its own beliefs in the supernatural, its own churches, its own high priests, its own saints, its own total worldview, and its own explanation of the existence of the universe. In other words, liberalism contains all the attributes of what is generally known as 'religion.'"
GODLESS throws open the doors of the “Church of Liberalism.”
© 2006 Universial Media