May 24, 2013
May 22, 2013
They launched the 'Arab Spring' but now yearn for the good old days of a strongman
May 20, 2013
Richard A. Serrano: Is Meir Kahane's assassin now a changed man?
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
Dec. 31, 2009
/ 14 Teves 5770
Yes, Someone Has To Pay for Health Care
Debra J. Saunders
Most Americans already have health care insurance, but many middle-class
Americans are afraid of losing what they have. The fear is especially
profound when a person can work hard and steadily for years, only to
find him-or-herself suddenly out of a job and without the means to pay
for a costly illness.
There have been too many horror stories about people who responsibly buy
personal health plans, only to find out that the plans don't really
cover large medical bills. If a person gets a job that provides health
care benefits, his or her current health problems may not be covered
because they are pre-existing conditions.
Washington's catchphrase for the above situation has been, as the
fiscal-watchdog group the Concord Coalition wrote in its recent report
on health care reform, "doing nothing is not a responsible option."
The other half of the equation, however, is, as the report continued,
"It does not follow, however, that doing anything would improve the
situation." Alas, doing anything seems to be the one thing at which
Now, I've got issues with the bills passed in the House and Senate when
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Harry Reid kept tossing in
benefits while promising to reduce the country's health care tab.
But my new fear is that during conference committee, lawmakers will
throw in even more goodies and then, to make everybody happy, reduce the
tax increases necessary to fund the plan. The closer they come to
President Obama's 2008 campaign rhetoric universal health care that
only rich people pay for the more red ink they will pass on to the
The House proposes a 5.4 percent tax on workers earning more than
$500,000 annually, or $1 million for couples. The Senate relies heavily
on what is called hide-the-tax excise tax on so-called Cadillac
health care plans. The Senate also would increase Medicare taxes on
families earning more than $250,000.
The problem with soaking the rich to pay for a health care plan? This is
the fastest-shrinking tax imaginable when the economy sours. If
California can serve any useful function in this debate, it should be as
a warning to the dangers of over-relying on taxes on the rich.
Besides, as the Concord Coalition noted, broadly based taxes "spread the
notion that all must contribute something for government benefits
imposing an important breaker against 'free lunch' spending giveaways."
Hence the coalition's support for the tax on so-called Cadillac health
While critics on the left complain that the Cadillac tax will squeeze
union workers and the middle-class, I have issues with taxing those with
health care benefits to pay for those who don't. Better to pass a
value-added tax, but at least this excise eventually would make everyone
pay for a universal benefit.
Concord Coalition Policy Director Josh Gordon believes, "Once people
start feeling the cost of their insurance, they start getting concerned
about premiums being too high." He added that if negotiators remove the
Senate excise-tax and cost-control measures, the Concord Coalition would
have to brand a final bill as "irresponsible legislation."
Note to anti-tax Republicans: If Washington passes a bill, someone has
to pay for it. The only question is who, when and how much.
Note to soak-the-richers: You can't say that universal health care is a
moral imperative, but only other people should pay for it.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders' column by clicking here.
Debra J. Saunders Archives
© 2010, Creators Syndicate
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K