
 |
|
Nov. 20, 2009
Nov. 19, 2009
Jonathan Tobin: ADL Crosses the Line with Report Bashing Obama Critics
Nov. 18, 2009
JWisdom.com: The (Jewish) Dating Game
with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff (8 minutes)
Nov. 17, 2009
Steven Emerson: How Does the 4th Amendment Impact Terror Finance Investigations?
JWisdom.com: If Frank Sinatra married Edith Piaf
with Rabbi Y.Y. Rubinstein (2 minutes) Life lessons from what would be regarded as the most inappropriate lyrics ever sung
Nov. 16, 2009
JWisdom.com: Deconstructing faith
with Rabbi Warren Goldstein (9 minutes)
Nov. 13, 2009
JWisdom.com Sarah's subjective reality
with Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 6 minutes)
Nov. 12, 2009
JWisdom.com Does God get tired?
with Rabbi Harvey Belovski ( 5 minutes)
Nov. 11, 2009
JWisdom.com Marriages are not made in Heaven
with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff (VERY fast 15 minutes)
Nov. 10, 2009
Michael Doyle: Author of book exposing CAIR ordered to remove supporting documents from Web
JWisdom.com If the creation so loudly shouts the existence of the Creator, why aren't more people believers? with Rabbi Naftali Brawer (9 minutes)
Nov. 9, 2009
Mark Steyn: Shooter exposes hole
in U.S. terror strategy
JWisdom.com It's never too late to
have a happy childhood with Sarah Chana Radcliffe (5 minutes)
Nov. 6, 2009
JWisdom.com Zero to 1/60th: How
to Empower An Hour with Gavriel Aryeh Sande (7 minutes)
Nov. 5, 2009
JWisdom.com Hidden Hints: Unlocking
Faith & Prayer with Rabbi Jay Yaacov Schwartz (10 minutes)
Nov. 4, 2009
JWisdom.com When God played peacemaker
With Rabbi Sroy Levitansky (5 minutes)
Nov. 3, 2009
JWisdom.com Are you are closet idolater?
With Sara Yoheved Rigler (10 minutes)
Nov. 2, 2009
JWisdom.com Abraham's Strange Change
With Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer (5 minutes)
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Nov. 17, 2005
/ 15 Mar-Cheshvan, 5766
Thin green line is bad science
By
Debra J. Saunders
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
There is a myth in the American media. It goes like this: The
good scientists agree that global warming is human-induced and would be
addressed if America ratified the Kyoto global warming pact, while bad,
heretical scientists question climate models that predict Armageddon because
they are venal and corrupted by oil money.
A Tuesday Open Forum piece in The San Francisco Chronicle,
written by a UC Berkeley journalism professor and a UC Berkeley energy
professor, provides a perfect example of this odd view that all scientists
ascribe to a common gospel: "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC), a U.N.-sponsored group of more than 2,000 scientists from more than
100 countries, has concluded that human activity is a key factor in elevated
carbon-dioxide levels and rising temperatures and sea levels that could
prove catastrophic for tens of millions of people living along Earth's
coastlines."
The piece also cited research by "Naomi Oreskes, a science
historian at UC San Diego, who reviewed 928 abstracts of peer-reviewed
articles on climate change published in scientific journals between 1993 and
2003 and could not find a single one that challenged the scientific
consensus that human-caused global warming is real."
The authors then attacked best-selling author Michael Crichton
because Crichton accepted an invitation to testify from Sen. James Inhofe,
R-Okla., "who is heavily supported by oil and gas interests" and who
horrors dared to ask whether the global-warming scare is a hoax. That is
the sort of McCarthyist guilt by association that one would not expect to
encounter in the name of science.
Crichton spoke at an Independent Institute event Tuesday night
with three apostate scientists. It's odd that Oreskes couldn't find a single
article that didn't follow the thin green line on global warming. Panelist
and Colorado State University professor of atmospheric science William M.
Gray, a hurricane authority, announced that he thinks that the biggest
contributor to global warming is the fact that "we're coming out of a little
ice age," and that the warming trend will end in six to eight years.
Said Gray, sagely, "Consensus science isn't science." No lie. In
fact, it's a bizarre argument. Why do global-warming believers keep pushing
this everyone-agrees line when consensus uber alles is so, well, unacademic?
The ideal should not be scientists who think in lockstep, but those in the
proud mold of the skeptic, who takes a hard look at the data and proves
conventional wisdom wrong.
Independent Institute President David Theroux hailed that trait
in this year's winner of Nobel Prize for medicine, Barry Marshall, who
believed ulcers were caused by bacteria, when the establishment knew that
Marshall's theory was "preposterous" except that Marshall turned out to
be right.
Crichton focused on the many times that fad science has been
wrong. Remember Y2K? Ho-hum. The population-bomb scare? Yawn. Then there's
Yellowstone, the national park that declined due to rangers' misbegotten
(and often fatal for the wildlife) conviction that they knew what was best
for the animals in this case, they killed wolves and overprotected elk
until the whole ecosystem suffered.
On Tuesday, Inhofe issued a statement from Capitol Hill that
noted how scientists with independent views don't get on too well with the
IPCC. Witness Chris Landsea of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, who resigned from the IPCC this year because he believed an
IPCC top hurricane scientist wrongly linked severe hurricanes to global
warming. As a result, he wrote, "the IPCC process has been subverted and
compromised, its neutrality lost."
I've seen this when covering failed educational fads: Curriculum
boards chase out the free thinkers, then smugly announce that all the
experts agree with them so they must be right.
What did Gray think of the Oreskes report? "It shows you how
we've all been brainwashed."
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.
Debra J. Saunders Archives
© 2005, Creators Syndicate
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Michael Barone
Dave Barry
Tony Blankley
Andy Borowitz
David Broder
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
John Fund
Frank J. Gaffney
Lloyd Garver
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Lewis Grossberger
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Laura Ingraham
Cheri Jacobus Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Dick Morris
Bill O'Reilly
Jim Mullen
Clarence Page
Kathleen Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Jonathan Rauch
Celia Rivenbark
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Culture Shlock
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
Gary Brookins
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holber
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Ranan R. Lurie
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Ed Stein
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

How 2
Lori Borgman
The Savvy Consumer
Elder matters
Fixit
Dr. Peter Gott
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Tech Maven
Every Monday Matters
Nutrition Myths
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
How Stuff Works
|