|
|
|
Jewish World Review Nov. 2, 2005 / 30 Tishrei, 5766 With Alito pick, Bush dares Democrats By Peter A. Brown
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
He's ready for a high-stakes game of chicken over the Supreme Court
nomination. George Bush's choice of Samuel Alito is an
acknowledgement that politics is a zero-sum game, and that pleasing
your supporters — especially when they're in the majority — takes
precedence over the other side's complaints.
Bush has been in a slump; his poll numbers stink. The Supreme Court
nomination of Alito, however, is the act of a man who knows that
there is nothing better to reverse sagging fortunes than winning an
all-out battle.
He is daring Democrats to make his day.
In a party-line division, Democrats don't have the votes to defeat
Alito — unless they want to take the ultimate gamble on a
filibuster.
If they lose a filibuster test, they would be giving Bush a free
pass to nominate whomever he wants in the next three years should
another vacancy occur. One of the liberals' favorite justices, John
Paul Stevens, is 85.
It is possible Alito won't pass muster with six GOP senators, the
number of converts a unified Democratic Party needs to beat him.
That seems unlikely, though, absent new revelations about a man who
has long been scrutinized as a possible Supreme Court justice. Also,
it's as likely some Democrats would support Alito as Republicans
will oppose him.
Supreme Court confirmations are elections with 100 voters. The GOP
has 55, plus Vice President Dick Cheney is the tiebreaker.
Bush is baiting Democrats who have been itching for a Supreme Court
fight. If they do, the president has the opportunity to win a
confrontation that could reverse his political fortunes.
He could have made a less bold nomination than a jurist whom some
compare to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, whose rulings
generally displease Democrats.
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, who had told Bush that he would
not fight the selection of Harriet Miers, publicly warned Bush not
to nominate Alito if he wanted to avoid a no-holds-barred fight.
On paper, Democrats have the 41 votes (with four to spare) to
filibuster the nomination, although seven of their members have
previously agreed not to do so except in the case of "extraordinary
circumstances."
Republican Senate Leader Bill Frist has warned said that if the
Democrats take that route, he would try to change the rules to
require 51 votes to sustain a filibuster — and he might well have
enough support.
Seven of the 55 GOP senators joined with the seven moderate
Democrats to resolve a dispute over Bush's nominees to the U.S.
Courts of Appeals last spring. The Republicans reserved the right to
change the rules should their Democratic colleagues filibuster in
the future.
The question is whether those seven Democrats consider Alito so
extreme that they would support a filibuster, and then whether the
seven Republicans would agree with Frist to change the rules.
Look for the confirmation to become a giant game of chicken.
Democrats would have to be sure they could prevail — otherwise a
rules change would create a risky situation for them should Bush get
another Supreme Court appointment. That would be the case even if,
as expected, they pick up some Senate seats next year, but not
enough for a majority.
Make no mistake about it: Alito gives Teddy Kennedy & Co. horrors.
He is the prototype of the judge who thinks the courts have gone too
far in stepping in to create law that state and federal legislators
have been unwilling to write.
Moreover, his judicial credentials are unassailable. He has spent 15
years as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge and is considered to be a
top-flight legal mind, even by those who abhor his decisions.
Since Bush's election, in 2000, liberal interest groups have been
raising millions of dollars to defeat Bush court nominees. They
decided John Roberts' credentials were so impressive they could not
defeat him, and he was easily confirmed as chief justice in
September.
They were generally silent over Bush's choice of Miers because she
was the most acceptable candidate they could get, and they knew that
praising her would just kill her nomination with Republicans.
Even without their overt support, the very views and background that
made her more acceptable to Democrats were the reasons she became
unacceptable to the president's conservative base, which is why she
withdrew as a nominee.
The Democrats and their interest-group allies now must decide how
much to risk on the Alito nomination.
To go all-out to stop Alito risks not just losing the nomination
fight.
It risks giving new traction to a president who has been on the
ropes. And that could remove the biggest asset Democrats have
entering the 2006 elections.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Peter A. Brown is an editorial page columnist for the Orlando Sentinel. Comment by clicking here. © 2005, Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services |
Mitch Albom | |||||||||||
