May 22, 2013
They launched the 'Arab Spring' but now yearn for the good old days of a strongman
May 20, 2013
Richard A. Serrano: Is Meir Kahane's assassin now a changed man?
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
Oct. 17, 2012 / 1 Mar-Cheshvan, 5773
Undermining the values that enable people in poverty to escape it? Sadly, yes
A. Barton Hinkle
Damien Coleman lives in the Roseland section of Chicago one of the worst neighborhoods in America. He has two children, no wife, no college degree, and he works at a shoe store. He is a very successful young man.
Coleman is successful because he is much better off than many of his peers. The New York Times Magazine recounted Coleman's journey in a recent cover story on President Obama and poverty. The article drives home two points: (1) Obama has forgotten his lofty rhetoric about reducing poverty in America (and the article aims to remind him), and (2) reducing poverty will require something different from the War on Poverty launched by Lyndon Johnson which isn't working, hasn't for a while, and maybe never did.
Granted, such a judgment depends on the definition of "working." According to a recent study by the Cato Institute, the federal government has 126 separate anti-poverty programs. If their aim is simply to alleviate the worst material hardships by providing basic necessities, then taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor works to some extent. But if the goal is to reduce poverty, rather than merely treat its symptoms, then those programs are a colossal failure.
The past four decades bear out that lesson. Since the Johnson administration the country has spent more than $16 trillion (not billion trillion) fighting poverty. Result? "Americans who live below the poverty line are much less likely to be hungry or malnourished today than they were then," says The Times. "A majority of families below the poverty line now have material possessions that would have been unthinkable luxuries in the 1960s: air-conditioning, cable TV, a mobile phone." And yet: "In 1966, at the height of the War on Poverty, the poverty rate was just under 15 percent of the population; in 2010, the most recent year for which data is available, it was 15.1 percent. . . . In 2010, one in every 10 American children lived in deep poverty" that is, in families with income less than 50 percent of the poverty line.
Conservatives complain, with some justification, that poverty metrics keep moving the goalposts e.g., by pegging poverty rates to a percentage of median income, a trick that measures relative inequality rather than any absolute shortage of material necessities. This is true to an extent. At the same time, nobody in his right mind would call the current deep-poverty benchmark $11,000 per year for a family of four too high.
Such a family will continue to receive massive amounts of government aid. According to the Cato study, over the next 10 years "federal and state governments will spend $250,000 for every American currently living in poverty, or $1 million for every poor family of four." Yet more than likely, those families will be just as poor in a decade as they are now. Why?
The Times strongly suggests the problem is cultural. The older folks in Damien Coleman's neighborhood worry the progress they once saw is "rooted in thin soil," because there is a "lack of discernable order," an "absence of . . . coherence." Those are the words of Barack Obama, in "Dreams from My Father," describing what he saw as a community organizer in Chicago.
The rest of the article backs him up: "In the 1960s, most Americans, rich, middle-class, and poor, were raising children in two-parent homes; they lived in relatively stable, mixed-income communities; they went to church in roughly similar numbers; their children often attended the same public schools. Today, those social factors all diverge sharply by class, and the class for which things have changed most starkly is the poor. Damien may have a cellphone, but he has never met his father."
And yet rather than address such problems, the Obama administration may be contributing to them by expanding the welfare rolls, further undermining the values that enable people in poverty to escape it. As Cato notes, the administration has loosened eligibility requirements, including "categorical eligibility," which "allows states to declare large numbers of families eligible for food stamps without actually going through the individual eligibility process." What's more, thanks to the 2009 stimulus bill, "states that succeed in getting people off welfare lose the opportunity for increased federal funding. And states that make it easier to stay on welfare . . . are rewarded with more taxpayer cash. The bill even let states with rising welfare rolls continue to collect their 'case-load reduction' bonuses."
The Times article suggests a need to spend even more. Yet it's hard to see how doing more of the same will produce either hope or change. Here, an analogy put forward by The New Republic's John McWhorter seems fitting. A pedestrian who is struck by a car should get help. He certainly cannot be blamed for his circumstance. But if he hopes to walk again, the day will come when he will have to do the hard and painful work of physical therapy. Nobody else can do it for him, and to extend the analogy no amount of money can buy him out of it.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
A. Barton Hinkle is Deputy Editor of the Editorial Pages at Richmond Times-Dispatch
Comment by clicking here.
• 10/11/12: How Much Is This Tax Cut Gonna Cost Me, Doc?
• 10/04/12: Warrantless spying skyrockets under Obama
• 08/20/12: The wrong side absolutely must not win
• 08/14/12: America was not built on dirt alone
• 08/02/12: Libs Discover Their Inner Cheney
• 07/30/12: Feds want to help you --- whether you want help or not
• 07/23/12: Barack Obama, Storyteller-in-Chief
• 07/23/12: Nation's worst outsourcer? You
• 07/19/12: Listen up, America: You need to knuckle under
• 07/12/12: Obama, Romney: As Different as Two Peas in a Pod
• 07/05/12: Are teenagers big children --- or little adults?
• 06/25/12: Minorities treated as mere numbers
• 06/21/12: Memo to the the Little Guy: Seemingly innocuous activity could bring the federal hammer down out of a clear blue sky
• 06/19/12: We mustn't let America be buffaloed
• 05/31/12: Drop and Give Uncle Sam 20
• 05/15/12: The feds would like to know if you enjoyed that video
• 05/03/12: Obama inspires: 'America --- Still Not as Bad Off as Venezuela!'
• 04/26/12: It's everyone's favorite time of year again
• 03/29/12: GOP disillusionment is a good thing
• 03/27/12: Just what America needs: more red tape
• 03/20/12: Nation wondering: what happening to language?
• 02/21/12: Culture warriors resort to propaganda
• 02/15/12: Step away from that cookie and grab some air
• 02/08/12: Lessons in heresy
• 02/01/12: Do We Really Need Pickle-Flavored Potato Chips?
• 01/11/12: Shut up, they explained
• 12/30/11: A Modest Proposal: Let's Ban All Sports!
• 12/26/11: A Christmas letter from the Obamas
• 02/24/11: Will the next Watson need us?
• 12/24/10: Here Are Some Good Gifts for People You Hate
• 06/15/10: The Presinator
• 05/26/10: More than equal
• 04/08/10: Angry Right Takes a Page From Angry Left but guess who is ugly?
• 02/16/10: Either Obama owes George W. Bush an apology, or he owes the rest of us a very good explanation for his about-face on wiretapping
• 02/03/10: Talkin' to us 'tards
• 01/27/10: I never thought I'd see the day when progressives would howl in ragebecause the Supreme Court said government should not ban books
• 01/07/10: Gun-Control Advocates Play Fast and Loose
• 12/31/09: Nearly everything progressives say about neoconservative interventionism abroad applies to their own preferred policies at home
© 2011, A. Barton Hinkle
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K