
 |
|
Nov. 6, 2009
JWisdom.com Zero to 1/60th: How
to Empower An Hour with Gavriel Aryeh Sande (7 minutes)
Nov. 5, 2009
JWisdom.com Hidden Hints: Unlocking
Faith & Prayer with Rabbi Jay Yaacov Schwartz (10 minutes)
Nov. 4, 2009
JWisdom.com When God played peacemaker
With Rabbi Sroy Levitansky (5 minutes)
Nov. 3, 2009
JWisdom.com Are you are closet idolater?
With Sara Yoheved Rigler (10 minutes)
Nov. 2, 2009
JWisdom.com Abraham's Strange Change
With Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer (5 minutes)
Oct. 30, 2009
Oct. 29, 2009
JWisdom.com We Must Revamp our
Religious Vocabulary With Gavriel Aryeh Sanders ( 10 minutes)
Oct. 28, 2009
JWisdom.com Why what we wear
impacts who we are
With Rabbis Mordechai Becher, Menachem Golberger and Aliza Bulow ( 10 minutes)
Oct. 27, 2009
Paul Greenberg: The United Nations Is Outraged Again, Or: Department of Mideast Static
JWisdom.com The Science of Love
With Rabbi Jonathan Rietti ( 7 minutes)
Oct. 26, 2009
JWisdom.com Wisdom and Wonks
With Rabbi Eytan Feiner ( 7 minutes)
Oct. 23, 2009
JWisdom.com Watermark and oneness
with Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 4 minutes)
Caroline B. Glick Stop using limited powers in a way that expands our enemies' advantages over us
Oct. 22, 2009
JWisdom.com No More More Family Fights --- Really?
By Sarah Chana Radcliffe ( 5 minutes)
Oct. 21, 2009
Tonya Alanez: Holocaust denier sues survivor, calling Auschwitz memoir 'vicious lies'
JWisdom.com Meditating Jewishly: A
Panacea for Success by Sarah Yoheved Rigler ( 7 minutes)
Oct. 20, 2009
Dennis Prager: Obama and Dalai Lama: Why Israel Worries about U.S. President
JWisdom.com Abraham was not religious
By Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer ( 6 minutes)
Oct. 19, 2009
JWisdom.comWhy Good People Do Bad Things
By Rabbi Eytan Feiner ( 7 minutes)
Oct. 16, 2009
JWisdom.com Hearing Voices
By Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 5 minutes)
Oct. 15, 2009
JWisdom.com: Former MTV producer and stand-up comedian Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff: Taming a Control Freak (A VERY fast 15 minutes)
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Oct. 17, 2006
/ 25 Tishrei, 5767
Failing to stop North Korea from going nuclear may have been the last straw for the onetime guardian of world order
By
Niall Ferguson
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Last week may well be remembered as the beginning of the end for the U.N. Security Council. The institution that has been so central to the post-1945 international order was already tottering under the weight of its own recent failures. But North Korea's claim to have conducted a successful nuclear test last Monday appears to have been the final straw.
For a split second, it seemed that the five permanent members of the Security Council might agree on a tough response. But no. By Thursday, Chinese and Russian spokesmen were talking as if the entire crisis were somehow the fault of the United States. By Saturday, the original U.S. draft resolution had been turned into an insecurity council irresolution. Sanctions have been imposed, but the threat of military force has been explicitly ruled out, and the Chinese say they won't help search ships going into and out of North Korea.
We have seen exactly the same pattern of behavior this year over Iran's thinly veiled nuclear arms program. The U.S., Britain and France have been pressing for action. China and Russia have qualified every phrase, watered down every demand, dragged every foot.
At first sight, this insouciance on the part of Beijing and Moscow makes no sense. The Security Council is, to be sure, an anachronism. That the council's five veto-wielding permanent members are Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States a rather uncongenial club of ex-empires and crypto-empires is a legacy of decisions made more than 60 years ago.
The original idea was that the victors of World War II would act as the executive committee of the U.N. to prevent it from sinking into impotence like the League of Nations. Franklin Roosevelt, who greatly exaggerated the stability and strength of Chiang Kai-shek's regime, wanted China as the fourth member. Winston Churchill, fearful that the Chinese would be U.S. stooges, pressed the claim of liberated France.
Then the law of unintended consequences kicked in. Superpower relations descended into the Cold War. Britain ceased to be a great power, losing its empire and becoming Uncle Sam's Mini-me. China went communist, leaving its Security Council seat in the hands of a rump nationalist regime in Taiwan. And France proved less than grateful for its liberation from German tutelage.
Small wonder the Security Council has more often agreed to disagree over the years. Small wonder it has passed many more resolutions than it has successfully implemented. To confuse matters further, two of the permanent members of the club have subsequently changed their identities. The Chinese seat was handed over to the People's Republic in 1971, and Russia inherited the Soviet Union's seat 20 years later.
Yet in one respect the permanent members remain a true club. They are the sole legitimate nuclear powers recognized by the 1968 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. And for that reason alone, you might have expected them to make common cause against both North Korea and Iran. Their failure to do so strongly suggests that neither China nor Russia believes any longer in the principle of nonproliferation. They attach more significance to the realpolitik of regional power. China sees a politically unpredictable but economically dependant North Korea as a rogue rook on the East Asian chessboard, while Russia sees a U.S.-hating, oil-rich Iran as a potential partner in a new world order based on energy exports.
Many commentators have been prompted by this crisis to ask if the Nonproliferation Treaty has any future. But the real question is whether the Security Council has a future. It is generally a bad sign for any institution when a majority of experts agree that it needs to be reformed. Today, almost no one in the field of international relations would argue against Security Council reform.
The latest proposals come from G. John Ikenberry and Anne-Marie Slaughter, who have just published "Forging a World of Liberty Under Law," the final report of the Princeton Project on International Security. "It makes no sense, in 2006," they write, "for five countries that represent the distribution of power at the end of World War II to have individual vetoes over what constitutes legitimate action."
They endorse the 2004 proposal of the U.N. High Level Panel (that Brazil, Germany, India, Japan and two African states presumably the most populous, Egypt and Nigeria should be invited to join the Security Council as permanent members without a veto. They also call for the abolition of all the existing veto rights "for resolutions authorizing direct action in response to a crisis." Instead, they argue, such resolutions should require only "a supermajority vote of perhaps three-quarters of voting members."
Hard to fault, isn't it? Such a Security Council would represent a much larger proportion of the world's population (55% as opposed to the current 29%) and would surely not engage in the kind of "prevarication and obstructionism" of which the authors rightly complain. Except that in such an expanded Security Council, it would be possible to construct a supermajority with just nine out of 11 members. And what if the outvoted minority happened to be Britain and the U.S.?
The French political philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville observed that "the most dangerous moment for a bad government is usually when it begins to reform itself." Whenever I hear American theorists arguing for reform of the Security Council, I think of those wise words.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
| BUY THE BOOKS |
|
Click HERE to purchase it at a discount. (Sales help fund JWR.).
Click HERE to purchase it at a discount. (Sales help fund JWR.). |
|
Niall Ferguson is a professor of history at Harvard University. He is the author of "Empire" (Basic Books, 2003) and "Colossus" (Penguin, 2004).
Comment by clicking here.
10/03/06: Why Churchill opposed torture
09/27/06: Insanity on a Global Scale
09/19/06: The GOP will hang on
09/13/06: Long Live Royal Bloodlines!
09/05/06: Red-state Republicans and blue-faced liberals are starting to agree: Green is the way
08/29/06: What if the London Bombers Succeeded?
08/15/06: Testing the Limits of the U.N.: Who seriously expects Kofi Annan to stop Al Qaeda terror attacks?
08/08/06: The coming tsunami of trash
07/18/06: Forget the '60s and Make Love, Not War. Today's world is facing a Summer of Rage
07/11/06: When will China pull the plug on North Korea?
06/20/06: Hedge funds vs. central bankers: Will inflation, deflation or recession win in the coming months?
06/13/06: Britain's economy is just like America's minus the entrepreneurs and growth
06/06/06: The X-Men have taken over Washington
05/30/06: Quit protesting, profs!
05/23/06: World markets' wild ride: Economic volatility is back with a vengeance
05/16/06: The Cold Wars are coming
05/09/06: Many commentators are missing dangerous political shift
05/02/06: Put some sugar in your tank
04/25/06: Hu and the dog that didn't bark
04/18/06: Should Americans be less optimistic?
04/11/06: Globalization's second death?
04/04/06: So many special friends
03/28/06: Let's get it right about what has gone wrong
03/21/06: Congress is trying to give the world a globotomy
03/14/06: Lame ducks can still bite back
03/07/06: A 19th Century critique of a 21st Century president
02/28/06: The crash of civilizations
02/21/06: Not the president, but close
02/14/06: Want historic trouble? Look south
02/07/06: Greenspan advising Britain? It's housing bubbles, deficits and potential meltdowns all over again
01/31/06: Missing the Cold War
01/24/06: It's a sick, Thick World
01/17/06: Tomorrow's world war today
01/03/06: Scotland, it's over, but keep the accents
12/20/05: History, democracy and Iraq
12/20/05: History, democracy and Iraq
11/22/05: Ghost of Napoleon haunts Tony Blair
11/22/05: Can it happen in Britain too?
11/15/05: Red plus blue equals purple
11/10/05: The fires of disintegration
11/01/05: Triumph of an über-wonk
© 2006, Los Angeles Times
Distributed by Los Angeles Times Syndicate
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Michael Barone
Dave Barry
Tony Blankley
Andy Borowitz
David Broder
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
John Fund
Frank J. Gaffney
Lloyd Garver
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Lewis Grossberger
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Laura Ingraham
Cheri Jacobus Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Dick Morris
Bill O'Reilly
Jim Mullen
Clarence Page
Kathleen Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Jonathan Rauch
Celia Rivenbark
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Culture Shlock
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
Gary Brookins
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holber
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Ranan R. Lurie
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Ed Stein
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

How 2
Lori Borgman
The Savvy Consumer
Elder matters
Fixit
Dr. Peter Gott
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Tech Maven
Every Monday Matters
Nutrition Myths
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
How Stuff Works
|