|
|
|
Jewish World Review Oct. 6, 2005 / 3 Tishrei, 5765 High Court politics By Tony Blankley
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Washington politics is a contrary business right at the moment.
Republicans — and particularly conservatives — are somewhere between
despondent and furious. While Democrats — and particularly liberals — are
failing to come up with the reciprocal happy sentiments that usually provide
the emotional yin and yang of a Washington political moment.
I have in mind, of course, the curious case of the unloved
spinster just launched on the rocket docket to the Supreme Court. As a
card-carrying member of the conservative conclave, I would not have made
Miss Miers my first choice, or my thousandth. In fact, I would associate
myself with Brother-in-Christ Patrick Buchanan's searing preachment at
Monday's services concerning her wane qualifications for the high bench.
Of course, we conservatives were hoping for — and had
justifiable reasons to expect — that President Bush would nominate any one
of the many brilliant conservative legal intellectuals who our movement has
been carefully nurturing and advancing these past 30 years. We raised them
from precocious pups. We gave them succor when they presented themselves in
the political jungle. We advanced them carefully through the training
grounds of high office. And the deepness of their thoughts and the deftness
of their words made them beloved of the tribe.
And now this president, who we with our own millions of arms
raised on high, has spurned our best and chosen one of his lackluster own.
But despite our admiration for sapience, as a species we humans
are better at biting than thinking — which is understandable as we have
aspired to thought only for a few hundred thousand years, while we have been
biting and slashing since our DNA shared space in the crocodile.
And I confess I was doing a fair bit of snapping and snarling
myself on Monday. But after my reptilian aggression subsided, it dawned on
me that I needed to distinguish between the desirable and the necessary. In
politics, we are well ahead of the game if we gain 50 percent of our goals.
I have spent whole decades in politics where we accomplished almost nothing
except a hard-fought-for continued existence.
Of course I would have vastly and justifiably preferred
President Bush to have chosen a certain, proven, intellectually formidable
legal warrior (of whom he had an abundant choice). But I have to admit on
reflection that even with the dull, dutiful Dallas evangel, it is much more
likely than not, that 10 years from now she will be voting quite reliably
with Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and the one or two more generally conservative
justices who George Bush will probably have the chance to place on the court
in the remaining three and a third years of his presidency.
It could have been so much more. But it is probably enough. And
in politics, when we probably get enough — we should be thankful.
Which is why the Democrats this week do not share in glee
proportionally with our despond. First, they feared to bite the seemingly
guileless, yet cunning, Adonis who Bush first sent up for confirmation. Now
they are uncertain how to get their yawning mandibles to grab and hold the
hard but slight bones of the president's meager offering the second time
around.
It is often observed that each new president seems the opposite
personality of the one he follows (Washington and Adams, Buchanan and
Lincoln, Wilson and Harding, FDR and Truman, Eisenhower and JFK, Nixon and
Carter — (Ford doesn't count) Reagan and GHW Bush). And so it is with
Clinton and W.
Where Clinton had an uncontrollable need to be loved (yes, that
way as well as politically), GW Bush seems to be preternaturally a rock and
an island unto himself. He is not only comfortable in his own skin — as we
used to say admiringly, he is positively ornery in it. One might go so far
as to say he enjoys infuriating both friend and foe. If Clinton's weakness
was unmanly; W's self-possession is too manly. As Barbara Walters might say:
He is not being gentle with us.
As in life, so in politics, if one seeks disappointment, one
will surely find it. And conservatives have not had to look hard this week
to find the gloom. But it is the disappointment of an unrequited ardor, of
a not yet fully consummated passion. Such youthful vigor inevitably finds
its satisfaction.
Consider, in the alternative, the deeper disappointment that
liberals contemplate in this dreary autumn of their aspirations. The last
remaining champions of their principles sit aged and infirm on the high
bench — their former brilliance now brittle and susceptible to being
chiseled and crumbled by even the most modest conservative laborers.
Victory may not be heroic, but it will be ours.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here. Tony Blankley is editorial page editor of The Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.
© 2005, Creators Syndicate |
Arnold Ahlert | |||||||||||
