May 24, 2013
May 22, 2013
They launched the 'Arab Spring' but now yearn for the good old days of a strongman
May 20, 2013
Richard A. Serrano: Is Meir Kahane's assassin now a changed man?
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
Sept. 7, 2009
/ 18 Elul 5769
Too Much Gained in Afghanistan To Exit Now
Debra J. Saunders
As he campaigned for the presidency, Sen. Barack Obama argued
that Afghanistan should become "the central front in the battle against
terrorism." Obama has delivered on that issue. U.S. troop levels have more
than doubled since the beginning of a troop buildup first begun under
President George W. Bush.
The price for that promise is not cheap.
For the moment, more troops mean more combat. As Institute for
the Study of War President Kimberly Kagan noted at a Brookings Institute
event last month, "As those new troops come in, as we have seen, violence
will go up. They did so in Iraq. They will do so in Afghanistan because we
are going into areas that the enemy effectively has controlled. So we
mustn't conflate or confuse a rise in violence with success or failure."
But others see the rise in casualties 47 U.S. troops were
killed in combat in August, the deadliest month since the beginning of the
war eight years ago and charges of ballot fraud during the August
presidential and provincial council elections as signs of failure.
At a White House press conference Monday, CBS News' Chip Reid
asked White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, "Is it possible that you're
simply losing control in Afghanistan and it's going to continue to spiral
out of control?"
Also last week, Washington Post conservative columnist George F.
Will cited the rise in U.S. troop casualties and unquestioned corruption in
President Hamid Karzai's government, then called for Obama to reverse course
in Afghanistan. Will wrote, U.S. "forces should be substantially reduced to
serve a comprehensive revised policy: America should do only what can be
done from offshore, using intelligence, drones, cruise missiles, air
strikes, and small, potent special forces units, concentrating on the porous
1,500mile border with Pakistan, a nation that actually matters."
The very notion of recommitting the NATO strategy in Afghanistan
to unmanned drones goes against the philosophy of the top NATO commander,
U.S. Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, whose strategy calls for winning Afghan
hearts and minds, in part by reducing collateral deaths from air strikes. As
the Washington Post's David Ignatius reported, McChrystal's classified
report to the president on Afghanistan includes the headline: "Protecting
the people is the mission. The conflict will be won by persuading the
population, not by destroying the enemy."
McChrystal also is working to professionalize Afghanistan's
inadequate military and police forces much as Gen. David Petraeus worked
to beef up Iraq's national security forces.
On the left, the pressure to withdraw U.S. troops from
Afghanistan is even greater. At a Chronicle editorial board meeting
Wednesday, Rep. Jackie Speier, DHillsborough, complained about the cost of
the war and the lack of an exit strategy. "To me," Speier added, "Pakistan
is almost a greater threat."
Fariba Nawa, a freelance journalist based in the Bay Area and
dual citizen of Afghanistan and the United States, said that the Will/Speier
emphasis on Pakistan is "offensive to me let's go to Pakistan, a country
that really matters." They don't get it, she added, "Pakistan and
Afghanistan are connected."
"My gut feeling as an Afghan is that if the U.S. troops leave
again," Nawa told me, then civil war will return, women will lose precious
freedoms, aid workers will be killed and Afghanistan will return to its
Or as Brookings Institute senior fellow Bruce Riedel argued, "We
abandoned Afghanistan twice before. We know what happens. The first time we
got Sept. 11 and the al-Qaida base in Afghanistan. The second time, we got
the mess we're in here."
If U.S. troops leave, Riedel opined, "The triumph of jihadism or
the jihadism of al-Qaida and the Taliban in driving NATO out of Afghanistan
would resonate through the Islamic World."
Nawa cites Afghan support for the NATO mission. She sees more
people in school, relatives working at good jobs and women making advances
in cities. "If we leave," she cautioned, "then you're going to have all that
progress gone to waste."
Nawa has worked in Iraq and Afghanistan. At a Commonwealth Club
event in March, Nawa noted that unlike in Iraq, most Afghans supported U.S.
intervention from day one. "They don't consider the U.S. being there an
occupation," she said.
And: "They want the U.S. to stay and to help them build their
country." Think of the damage to America's reputation were the Will view to
prevail. A precipitous pullout would cement this country's reputation as an
unreliable ally that helicopters into countries with money and promises,
then rotates out when the body count rises, leaving behind those who have
risked their families by helping our mission.
If Washington were to bolt now, then what country in the world
would have reason to trust us?
As unpleasant as the situation in Afghanistan is, this is no
time to go squishy.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders' column by clicking here.
Debra J. Saunders Archives
© 2009, Creators Syndicate
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K