
 |
|
May 13, 2013
David G. Savage: Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Warren Richey: Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
Fred Weir: At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross : Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same? With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Sandy Kleffman: Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Roy Gutman: Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Mark Clayton: Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Kim Murphy: Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Pete Spotts: Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May: Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.: How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Morgan Housel Admit it: No one has any idea what's going on
April 22, 2013
US man departing country arrested on terror charges
Barbara Williams: An unorthodox but growing treatment in a 9-year-old's battle against cancer
April 19, 2013
Caroline B. Glick: Why Obama's visit to Israel had no impact on public opinion or government policy
Morgan Housel: Gold collapse: The start of something big?
Pete Spotts: Livable super-Earths? Two candidates among Kepler's latest finds
April 17, 2013
Shira Rubin: Too much of a good thing? 'Palestinians' realize downside of foreign aid boom
Morgan Housel: BAD NEWS: EVERYONE IS RIGHT!
April 15, 2013
Kristen Chick: Egyptian Christians respond with harsh words to attack -- rocks, Molotov cocktails, and gunfire -- against main cathedral
Marcy Darnovsky and Karuna Jaggar: High Court to decide if you should own your DNA
Howard LaFranchi: US bracing for more Russian blowback after taking action against 18 more human rights violators
April 12, 2013
Mark Clayton: New cybersecurity bill: Privacy threat or crucial band-aid?
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom: Jackie Robinson's Friend, Hank Greenberg; CNN's Jake Tapper; Texas County in the News is named for 19thC. Jewish soldier and Congressman
The Kosher Gourmet by Susan Russo: FRUITY QUINOA STUFFED PEPPERS: A flavorful, colorful and edible vessel of delicately fluffy, mildly nutty filling combined with chewy apricots, tangy cherries, and crunchy pistachios
April 10, 2013
Peter Grier: North Korean missiles: Could US shoot them down?
Morgan Housel: Warning: Don't waste your capital being fooled by profit prophets
Donald Hensrud, M.D.: Mayo Clinic Medical Edge: Take vitamin supplements with caution --- even approved, they may actually do damage
Eryn Brown: 74 DNA discoveries move cure closer for three cancers
April 8, 2013
Jonathan Tobin: What Part of No Preconditions Do American Jews Not Get?
Fred Weir: Is Putin finally trading his own party for a new power base?
|
| |
Jewish World Review
July 2, 2008
/ 29 Sivan 5768
Why we remain safe
By
Jack Kelly
| >
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Liberal pundit Michael Kinsley once defined a "gaffe" as a politician inadvertently
blurting out the truth. By that standard, Charlie Black, a senior adviser to Sen.
John McCain, committed a gaffe in an interview June 23 with Fortune magazine.
Mr. Black was asked by Fortune editor David Whitford what the impact on the
presidential election campaign would be if there were another terrorist attack on
U.S. soil.
"Certainly it would be a big advantage to (McCain)," Mr. Black responded.
There followed a hypocritical minuet with which we've become too familiar.
First, the faux angry response from the Obama campaign: "The fact that John McCain's
top adviser says that a terrorist attack on American soil would be a 'big advantage'
for their political campaign is a complete disgrace, and is exactly the kind of
politics that needs to change," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.
Then, the distancing from Sen. McCain: "I can't imagine why he would say it. It's
not true."
Finally, the groveling apology from Mr. Black: "I deeply regret the comments
they were inappropriate."
Mr. Black had said nothing that wasn't true, or that Democratic political
consultants don't say in private. When voter attention is focused on national
security, Sen. McCain benefits. A terrorist attack would focus voter attention on
national security.
But the attention of voters is not focused on national security, chiefly because
there hasn't been a terrorist attack on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001. The
number of experts who, on Sept. 12, 2001, would have predicted this happy state of
affairs is precisely zero.
The absence of an attack suggests to some, among them Sen. Obama, that there wasn't
much of a threat to start with. They want to return to the law enforcement approach
to fighting terrorism that prevailed before 9/11, and regard the Bush
administration's efforts to surveil terrorists a greater threat to Americans than
the terrorists themselves.
Since that approach contributed mightily to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the
1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers barracks, the 1998 bombing of our embassies in
Kenya and Tanzania, and the 2000 attack on the USS Cole, and, of course, 9/11, it's
no wonder Americans prefer Sen. McCain on security issues.
"Before 9/11, America's counterterrorist capacities were, to put it politely,
disorganized, unfocused, poorly staffed and poorly run," wrote former CIA officer
Reuel Marc Gerecht. "To President Clinton's credit and great shame, he
intellectually understood the nature and horrific potential of bin Ladenism and al
Qaida as he understood, and regularly tasked his senior officials to explain
nationally, the dangers of an increasingly restless Saddam Hussein. Yet he could
not summon the fortitude to strike devastatingly against al Qaida and its Taliban
protector or Iraq."
Doubtless much of our good fortune is due to increased vigilance by the FBI and
other security agencies. And some of it is due simply to good luck. But the
principal reason why we've been safe at home these last seven years has been the war
in Iraq.
Sen. Obama describes the war in Iraq as a "distraction" from the war on terror. But
that's not how al Qaida saw it.
In a 2005 letter to Abu Musab al Zarqawi, al Qaida's number two, Ayman al Zawahiri,
described Iraq as "the place for the greatest battle of Islam in this era."
A few months earlier (December, 2004), Osama bin Laden himself said in an audiotape:
"The whole world is watching this war and the two adversaries; the Islamic nation on
the one hand, and the United States and its allies on the other. It is either
victory and glory or misery and humiliation."
For al Qaida, Iraq has turned out to be misery and humiliation. The best of its
fighters have perished there, and so has its standing in the Arab world. Support
for the terror group has vanished within Iraq, and plummeted elsewhere in the Muslim
world. Other Islamic fundamentalists, among them Mr. Zawahiri's mentor, "Dr. Fadl,"
have criticized al Qaida and called for nonviolence.
In 2003, Canadian columnist David Warren hypothesized Iraq would be the flypaper
that would lure in al Qaida, and where it would be destroyed. While I doubt this
was a deliberate Bush administration strategy, that's the way it's working out.
Al Qaida was right that Iraq is the central front in the war on terror, but wrong
about the outcome. America's Democrats have been wrong about both.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jack Kelly, a former Marine and Green Beret, was a
deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan
administration. Comment by clicking here.
Jack Kelly Archives
© 2008, Jack Kelly
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Jay Ambrose
Michael Barone
Barrywood
Lori Borgman
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
Christine Flowers
Frank J. Gaffney
Bernie Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Argus Hamilton
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Ron Hart
Nat Hentoff
A. Barton Hinkle
Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ch. Krauthammer
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Ann McFeatters
Dale McFeatters
Dana Milbank
Jeanne Moos
Dick Morris
Jim Mullen
Deroy Murdock
Judge A. Napolitano
Bill O'Reilly
Clarence Page
Kathleen Parker
Star Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Sharon Randall
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Heather Robinson
Debra J. Saunders
Martin Schram
Greg Schwem
Culture Shlock
David Shribman
Roger Simon
Lenore Skenazy
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Ben Stein
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Dan Thomasson
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
ZeitGeist
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Lisa Benson
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
John Branch
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
Matt Davies
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Glenn Foden
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Walt Handelsman
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holbert
David Horsey
Lee Judge
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Jimmy Margulies
Jack Ohman
Michael Ramirez
Rob Rogers
Drew Sheneman
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Scott Stantis
Danna Summers
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters
Dan Wasserman

Tech Q&A
Mr. Know-It-All
Ask Doctor K
Richard Lederer
Frugal Living
On Nutrition
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
|