Home
In this issue
April 9, 2014

Jonathan Tobin: Why Did Kerry Lie About Israeli Blame?

Samuel G. Freedman: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Jessica Ivins: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Kim Giles: Asking for help is not weakness

Kathy Kristof and Barbara Hoch Marcus: 7 Great Growth Israeli Stocks

Matthew Mientka: How Beans, Peas, And Chickpeas Cleanse Bad Cholesterol and Lowers Risk of Heart Disease

Sabrina Bachai: 5 At-Home Treatments For Headaches

The Kosher Gourmet by Daniel Neman Have yourself a matzo ball: The secrets bubby never told you and recipes she could have never imagined

April 8, 2014

Lori Nawyn: At Your Wit's End and Back: Finding Peace

Susan B. Garland and Rachel L. Sheedy: Strategies Married Couples Can Use to Boost Benefits

David Muhlbaum: Smart Tax Deductions Non-Itemizers Can Claim

Jill Weisenberger, M.S., R.D.N., C.D.E : Before You Lose Your Mental Edge

Dana Dovey: Coffee Drinkers Rejoice! Your Cup Of Joe Can Prevent Death From Liver Disease

Chris Weller: Electric 'Thinking Cap' Puts Your Brain Power Into High Gear

The Kosher Gourmet by Marlene Parrish A gift of hazelnuts keeps giving --- for a variety of nutty recipes: Entree, side, soup, dessert

April 4, 2014

Rabbi David Gutterman: The Word for Nothing Means Everything

Charles Krauthammer: Kerry's folly, Chapter 3

Amy Peterson: A life of love: How to build lasting relationships with your children

John Ericson: Older Women: Save Your Heart, Prevent Stroke Don't Drink Diet

John Ericson: Why 50 million Americans will still have spring allergies after taking meds

Cameron Huddleston: Best and Worst Buys of April 2014

Stacy Rapacon: Great Mutual Funds for Young Investors

Sarah Boesveld: Teacher keeps promise to mail thousands of former students letters written by their past selves

The Kosher Gourmet by Sharon Thompson Anyone can make a salad, you say. But can they make a great salad? (SECRETS, TESTED TECHNIQUES + 4 RECIPES, INCLUDING DRESSINGS)

April 2, 2014

Paul Greenberg: Death and joy in the spring

Dan Barry: Should South Carolina Jews be forced to maintain this chimney built by Germans serving the Nazis?

Mayra Bitsko: Save me! An alien took over my child's personality

Frank Clayton: Get happy: 20 scientifically proven happiness activities

Susan Scutti: It's Genetic! Obesity and the 'Carb Breakdown' Gene

Lecia Bushak: Why Hand Sanitizer May Actually Harm Your Health

Stacy Rapacon: Great Funds You Can Own for $500 or Less

Cameron Huddleston: 7 Ways to Save on Home Decor

The Kosher Gourmet by Steve Petusevsky Exploring ingredients as edible-stuffed containers (TWO RECIPES + TIPS & TECHINQUES)

Jewish World Review July 21, 2005 / 14 Tammuz, 5765

George Bush's Supreme pick

By Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
Printer Friendly Version
Email this article

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | It looks as if all the interests groups and nattering nabobs outside the White House have conspired to make placing his first U.S. Supreme Court nominee on the bench easy for President Bush.

The Left certainly has done its part.

For five years, Senate Democrats on the far left have hurled invectives at hot-button conservatives — especially female and minority judges. They've only got so much mud left — and they can't afford to waste it.

Nonetheless, they will hurl more at Bush nominee John G. Roberts Jr. and waste it. It's the only play they know.

Moveon.org quickly dismissed Roberts as a "right-wing lawyer and corporate lobbyist" who should not be confirmed. That's the best that they can do: Attack Roberts for being conservative and working for a Washington, D.C. law firm.

Feminist Majority Foundation President Eleanor Smeal was reduced to complaining that she is "dismayed" Bush nominated a man and demanding that the Senate not confirm Roberts unless he promises not to overturn Roe v Wade.

Push that line, and the White House can push back. Abortion rights's advocates want more than support for Roe — they want a pledge to find that the U.S. Constitution reserves the right for 15-year-olds to get abortions behind their parents's backs. Not much support for that.

Senate moderates cinched the Roberts nomination in May. That's when the so-called Gang of 14 — seven GOP and seven Democratic senators — announced that they would not go along with judicial filibusters. They promised to engage in this stalling tactic — that prevents a full vote — only under "extraordinary circumstances."

Translation: They will vote for a solid conservative who is not overly ideological.

And here he is. The Legal Times's Stuart Taylor described Roberts as "a good bet to be the kind of judge we should all want to have — all of us, that is, who are looking less for congenial ideologues than for professionals committed to impartial application of the law. If the Senate buries Roberts — again — it would be an outrage." Taylor wrote those words in 2002, when Roberts was a nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals. The Senate did bury Roberts by preventing a Senate vote, just as they buried him earlier after President George H.W. Bush nominated him in 1992. In 2003, when President George W. Bush re-nominated Roberts, the Senate confirmed him unanimously.

If not one Democrat objected to Roberts two years ago, how can the Dems filibuster now?

Conservative groups had threatened to walk away from President Bush if they didn't get a conservative judge. If Bush wouldn't do battle for them, they argued, then he wasn't worth electing.

Bush was clever: He gave the Right a conservative, but — barring unexpected news — the activists won't get their battle. Roberts is known more for his brains than his ideas.

The right-leaning Progress for America has pledged "an initial $18 million to combat dishonest attacks on Judge Roberts." But it's not clear that this pricey campaign is even necessary.

No fight. No fun. So flashy conservative Ann Coulter complained that Bush picked "a Rorschach blot" and a "Souter in Roberts's clothing." The more the far Right complains that he might be a centrist, the better Roberts looks.

Besides, the more accurate description would be: He is a jurist who knows how to write laws from a conservative angle without using loaded language. I read what I thought might be Roberts' most controversial decision: It upheld government actions in a public-relations disaster of a case. As Roberts wrote, authorities handcuffed, searched and detained a 12-year-old girl "all for eating a single French fry on the (Washington) Metro."

Because Metro police cited adults but detained children, the girl's family sued, citing unequal treatment. Roberts wisely noted that the Constitution discriminates by age — it lists minimum ages for members of Congress and president — and added that while there is reason to object to discrimination based on old age, "The concern that the state does not treat adults like children surely does not prevent it from treating children like children."

"No one is happy about the events that led to this litigation," Roberts began the opinion. But the law was constitutional.

Donate to JWR


For months now, news shows and opinion writers have been mishandling the next-nominee story. There was the scoop that Chief Justice William Rehnquist will resign. No, he's staying. (And why not? His brain is sharp, and his will is strong.) It turns out Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was retiring.

Then, pundits were sure Bush would pick a Latino. He didn't. Next, Bush will pick a woman. Laura Bush is pressuring him to do so. (As if.) And he didn't.

Tuesday, the scoop was: Bush will pick Edith Brown Clement. Oops. Wrong. No, he'll pick Edith Jones. Oops. Wrong again.

John G. Roberts is the real nominee. Bush looks brilliant for picking a conservative nominee who already passed through the Senate without a "no" vote. What Bush did was so obvious — picking a popular conservative — that everyone missed it.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.

Debra J. Saunders Archives

© 2005, Creators Syndicate

Columnists

Toons

Lifestyles