![]()
|
|
Jewish World Review July 27, 2005 / 20 Tammuz, 5765 Strange new reality makes us all players in a film-noir existence By Froma Harrop
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
GRAND CENTRAL STATION, New York City Who was Jean Charles de
Menezes? We know he was a Brazilian shot dead by police on a London subway.
A 27-year-old electrician, de Menezes was by all accounts totally
unconnected to terrorism. But through his behavior and cruel coincidence, de
Menezes gave police good reason to think he might be planning to detonate a
bomb. In the age of terrorism, police can kill an innocent man and still be
doing the right thing.
This strange new reality makes us all players in a film-noir
existence. Film noir refers to the eerie postwar movies in which characters
grope through a world of dark menace and unanswered questions. They don't
know what's going on, only that danger hovers.
Here in Grand Central Station, it's impossible not to think
about the de Menezes tragedy and a cinematic moment featuring another victim
of mistaken identity. The movie is Alfred Hitchcock's "North by Northwest."
Cary Grant is a New York ad man sucked into someone else's conspiracy. He
must evade both the law, which thinks he's killed a U.N. diplomat, and the
sinister forces who believe he's a secret agent. At Grand Central, he runs
onto a train and pleads with passenger Eva Marie Saint to hide him from
police. "Seven parking tickets," he explains.
In the real world, it's 2005, and Grand Central Station is
considered a potential terror target in Ground Zero City. Police and
bomb-sniffing dogs patrol the gorgeous marble floors. Announcements over the
loudspeakers warn people to prepare for random checks of bags and parcels.
Today, a chase of a suspected terrorist through Grand Central
Station would most likely end in bloodshed, as happened in London. You'd
expect it to. Given the fear level and the potential for mayhem, police have
little room for making a mistake on the side of a terrorist.
The British government expressed its regret over the de Menezes
death but admitted no wrongdoing or plans to change its shoot-to-kill policy
for suspected terrorists. Prime Minister Tony Blair noted that had police
not stopped a fleeing figure who did indeed then blew up a subway car, they
would be suffering far more criticism.
Why did de Menezes run from the police? There was speculation
that he was avoiding them because his immigrant's visa had run out. Whatever
his motives, one thing was clear: De Menezes had totally misread the new
script that subway passengers must follow in the wake of the London
bombings.
It says, Expect to be suspected. De Menezes had rushed past
police and did not stop when ordered. And, in the classic film-noir
tradition, he was trapped in a web of coincidences. He lived near one of the
suspected attackers. It was July, but he was wearing a heavy jacket, which
could have hidden a bomb. And, fitting the profile (so far) of the subway
terrorists, he was a young, dark-complexioned male.
On Monday, The New York Post had a picture of tourists on a
double-decker sightseeing bus with their hands up. They were surrounded by a
SWAT team, 100 police officers with guns drawn and dogs. Police had closed
several streets around the bus. It turns out that a bus dispatcher had
reported the presence of five Middle Eastern men with backpacks.
The men proved to be harmless, and the bus continued the tour. A
few blocks away, Penn Station was evacuated after a jerk told a ticket agent
that his suitcase contained a bomb.
Still, despite the jittery mood, urban Americans don't seem to
be letting the dark possibilities rein in their activities. But with the
obligation to carry on comes a new duty to seem innocent. In the age of
terrorism, we're all in the lineup. And it is dangerous to seem ambiguous.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
© 2005 Creators Syndicate |
Arnold Ahlert | |||||||||||