![]() |
Jewish World Review July 18, 2002 / 9 Menachem-Av 5762
Tisha B'Av: Humility before the law
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
Back when I possessed the charming innocence of a twelve-year-old, I took offense at the wording of the Pledge of
Allegiance. Why, I wondered, was I expected to pledge my allegiance to a flag? Proclaiming loyalty to my country I could
understand, but to a piece of fabric?
Moreover, as I had concluded with unshakable, preadolescent self-confidence that human existence was nothing more than a
cosmic accident, I found the phrase "under G-d" equally offensive.
And so, while my classmates were loudly reciting the full text of the Pledge of Allegiance, I was quietly editing my own
recitation: I pledge allegiance ... to the United States of America ... one nation ... indivisible, with liberty and justice for
all.
By my final year in high school, however, having acquired a sufficient measure of sophistication to appreciate the importance of
symbolism, I no longer resented being asked to swear loyalty to a flag. But we weren't reciting the Pledge of Allegiance any
more, so I had no chance to mend my ways.
I was also less certain concerning the existence of a Creator. Six years of secondary education had opened my eyes to a
universe so enormously complex that to embrace any world view as extreme as atheism seemed the height of arrogance. The
phrase "under G-d," therefore, struck me as a comforting expression of humility, that we as a nation recognized the grandeur of
our universe and conceded its unfathomability.
Perhaps the circuit court judges who ruled the phrase "under G-d" unconstitutional might have interpreted the law with more
humility if they had familiarized themselves not only with the letter, but with the spirit of the Constitution. Perhaps they might
have better understood the intent of the Framers if they had read, or remembered, the words of Alexander Hamilton: "The
sacred rights of mankind ... are written, as with a sun beam in the whole of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and
can never be erased or obscured by mortal power."
Considering the many references to the Almighty among the writings of the Framers of the Constitution, it's astonishing how
often we hear the Constitution invoked as the basis for expurgating every reference to G-d from the public arena. If the
founding fathers weren't afraid of mentioning G-d in the Declaration of Independence, why should we fear the utterance of His
name in our courthouses or schools?
But many among us are afraid, afraid with a fear born of insecurity.
Indeed, what is more terrifying than the unknown, and what is less known than what awaits us when we depart this mortal
coil? As Prince Hamlet pondered: "To sleep? Perchance to dream! Ay, there's the rub." For the devout atheist, there is no
greater dread than the haunting suspicion that he might be wrong, that there might truly be a Creator and an accounting before
Him upon arrival in the hereafter. To the atheist, every reference to G-d is an unwelcome reminder that the rest of the world is
not so certain that our existence is random and without purpose.
The great Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik summed it up like this: "All extremism, fanaticism and obscurantism come from a lack
of security. A person who is secure cannot be an extremist." And, indeed, extremism in the form of radical religion or radical
nihilism is one and the same. The 19th century anarchist used techniques not unlike the suicide bomber of today to advance his
own variety of jihad. The modern anarchist uses manipulation of the law to advance his cause, supremely confidant that he
understands the Constitution better than its authors.
The Talmud describes how, during the last days of the second Temple in Jerusalem, the Jewish people observed the law of the
Torah meticulously according to its letter. But they failed to look beyond the letter of the law, to strive for understanding and
fulfilling of the spirit of the law, to labor in applying the essence of the law toward the transformation their character. This
failure, together with a senseless hatred born of mutual suspicion, mutual contempt and, ultimately, the uncompromising
assertion of their own egos, resulted in the destruction of the Temple, the deaths of millions of Jews, and the beginning of our
long, dark exile scattered among the nations of the earth.
It has been observed that the word ego is in fact an acronym for Elbow G-d Out. Instead of subduing their egos before the
Highest Authority, instead of subjugating their ideological differences to the pursuit of shalom, the Jews distorted Divine law to
serve their own agendas, thereby sealing their fate and the fate of the Temple.
The sages teach that any generation that does not rebuild the Temple is considered to have destroyed the Temple. But if we
return to the law with humility and reverence, then we can truly hope to rebuild that which for so long has been lost.

By Rabbi Yonason Goldson
JWR contributor Rabbi Yonason Goldson teaches at Block Yeshiva High School and Aish HaTorah in St. Louis. Comment by clicking here.
