|
|
|
Jewish World Review April 7, 2005 / 27 Adar II, 5765 All wet on Schiavo story By Debra J. Saunders
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Conventional wisdom is clear: Washington's intervention in the
Terri Schiavo case hurt the GOP big-time. A Time Magazine poll found that
three-quarters of the public thought Congress was wrong to intervene after a
hospice, under court order, pulled the disabled woman's feeding tube, while
70 percent disapproved of President Bush's role in the saga.
Funny. A new Zogby International poll shows that, when asked
questions that go to the heart of the Schiavo matter, the public is very
much in sync with the failed attempt by Congress and Bush to save the
woman's life.
Zogby, in a poll commissioned by the Christian Defense
Coalition, found that by a two-to-one margin — 44 percent versus 24
percent — likely voters believe the law should assume a patient wants to
live and be kept alive with the help of a feeding tube, if a patient — like
Schiavo — left no written statement on end-of-life care. Should hearsay be
admissible (as happened with Schiavo), when courts decide if a feeding tube
should be removed? Some 57 percent said no; 31 percent said yes. If a
disabled person is not terminally ill, not in a coma, not on life support
and without a written end-of-life directive, should he or she be denied food
and water? Among those polled, 80 percent said no.
The poll is not clear-cut. A majority of those questioned said
elected officials should not intervene when the courts deny rights to the
disabled and that elected officials shouldn't intervene to protect a
disabled person's right to live, despite conflicting testimony. On the other
hand, a razor-thin majority, 44 percent, agreed that the feds should
intervene if a state court denies food and water to a disabled person; 43
percent disagreed.
The bottom line: The conventional wisdom is off. It may well be
that other polls showed voters disapproving of what Washington did, because
they didn't know Schiavo left no written directive, that there was
conflicting testimony on her end-of-life wishes or that her husband had two
children with another woman.
Conventional wisdom is also wrong in defining this case as a GOP
issue. Not one Democratic senator voted against the measure to send the case
to federal courts. As the Rev. Pat Mahoney of the Christian Defense Fund
noted, Sens. Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer and Hillary Clinton each had a
choice to vote against the bill, "and they didn't."
Also, lefties Jesse Jackson, Nat Hentoff and Ralph Nader opposed
removing the feeding tube. Ditto disability advocates. It's a bedrock issue:
You don't deny food and water to a disabled woman unless you know for sure
that she wants you to.
My favorite post-Schiavo spin is that the Democrats are the
party that wants to keep the government out of family life. Sure, that
works — if you forget that the Democrats want to take teenagers' birth
control and abortion decisions away from parents, Democrats want taxpayers
to pay for said birth control and abortions, and Democrats made spousal
abuse a federal crime.
You remember the alleged GOP memo that talked up how the Schiavo
story was "a great political issue" that would hurts the Dems and help the
GOP with its "pro-life base." ABC's Web site dubbed it the "GOP Talking
Points on Terri Schiavo."
It turns out, as The Washington Post's Howard Kurtz reported,
"no one seems to know who wrote it." The Post's Mike Allen explained that
the Post merely reported that the memo was "distributed to Republican
senators," but he believed the document to be "authentic" and "used to
attempt to influence Republican senators." How convenient that a memo, its
authorship unknown, that misspelled Terri Schiavo's name and that said
things only a moron would be dumb enough to put on paper, made it into ABC's
and The Washington Post's hands.
The kicker: A story that was supposed to be about the GOP
running roughshod over a woman's end-of-life wishes isn't about her known
wishes and isn't about the GOP, but about both parties.
Polls showed that Americans opposed what Washington did, but a
more in-depth poll suggests most voters strongly support the sentiments that
drove Washington to intervene. The Democratic Party wants government out of
family matters — unless they involve children. And the memo that was
supposed to show how craven the GOP is instead shows how gullible the media
can be.
Other than that, the convention wisdom is solid.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here. © 2005, Creators Syndicate |
Arnold Ahlert | |||||||||||
