Home
In this issue
Nov. 6, 2009
Rabbi Berel Wein: Choosing to hear
JWisdom.com Zero to 1/60th: How to Empower An Hour with Gavriel Aryeh Sande (7 minutes)
Caroline B. Glick The mullahs' big week
Suzanne Fields A Fallen Wall for Fallen Man
Nov. 5, 2009
The Kosher Gourmet: Three scrumptious -- but simple -- butternut squash dishes
JWisdom.com Hidden Hints: Unlocking Faith & Prayer with Rabbi Jay Yaacov Schwartz (10 minutes)
Nov. 4, 2009
Tom Hamburger and Kim Geiger: Should prayers be covered?
JWisdom.com When God played peacemaker With Rabbi Sroy Levitansky (5 minutes)
Nov. 3, 2009
Martin Peretz: Beware, Barack. Beware, Rahm. Beware, Axelrod
JWisdom.com Are you are closet idolater? With Sara Yoheved Rigler (10 minutes)
Nov. 2, 2009
Paul Greenberg: The Holocaust is now on Facebook
JWisdom.com Abraham's Strange Change With Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer (5 minutes)
Oct. 30, 2009
Rabbi David Aaron: Secret to Immortality
Caroline B. Glick Silencing dissent in America
Oct. 29, 2009
Lini S. Kadaba: Do tactics avert flu or reduce humanity?
JWisdom.com We Must Revamp our Religious Vocabulary With Gavriel Aryeh Sanders ( 10 minutes)
Oct. 28, 2009
Rabbi Yonason Goldson: Atheists in Bubbleland
JWisdom.com Why what we wear impacts who we are With Rabbis Mordechai Becher, Menachem Golberger and Aliza Bulow ( 10 minutes)
Oct. 27, 2009
Paul Greenberg: The United Nations Is Outraged Again, Or: Department of Mideast Static
JWisdom.com The Science of Love With Rabbi Jonathan Rietti ( 7 minutes)
Oct. 26, 2009
The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Damaging disclosures with a twist
JWisdom.com Wisdom and Wonks With Rabbi Eytan Feiner ( 7 minutes)
Oct. 23, 2009
Rabbi David Aaron: Are you ready for the ultimate pleasure?
JWisdom.com Watermark and oneness with Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 4 minutes)
Caroline B. Glick Stop using limited powers in a way that expands our enemies' advantages over us
Oct. 22, 2009
Steven Emerson: Terror Cases Share Desire to Kill Americans
JWisdom.com No More More Family Fights --- Really? By Sarah Chana Radcliffe ( 5 minutes)
Oct. 21, 2009
Tonya Alanez: Holocaust denier sues survivor, calling Auschwitz memoir 'vicious lies'
JWisdom.com Meditating Jewishly: A Panacea for Success by Sarah Yoheved Rigler ( 7 minutes)
Oct. 20, 2009
Dennis Prager: Obama and Dalai Lama: Why Israel Worries about U.S. President
JWisdom.com Abraham was not religious By Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer ( 6 minutes)
Oct. 19, 2009
JWisdom.comWhy Good People Do Bad Things By Rabbi Eytan Feiner ( 7 minutes)
Oct. 16, 2009
Rabbi Yonason Goldson: The Perfect Number
JWisdom.com Hearing Voices By Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 5 minutes)
Caroline B. Glick How Turkey was lost
Oct. 15, 2009
Jeff Jacoby: Peace vs. the 'peace process'
JWisdom.com: Former MTV producer and stand-up comedian Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff: Taming a Control Freak (A VERY fast 15 minutes)
Oct. 29, 2003
Mortimer B. Zuckerman: Graffiti On History's Walls (MUST-READ!)

Jewish World Review March 4, 2008 / 27 Adar I 5768

Clinton plays victim and victimizer

By Roger Simon


Printer Friendly Version

Email this article

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | The stage has been set for a Hillary Clinton comeback today.

Nobody knows if she has the votes to do it, but the opportunity is ripe.

She not only is vigorously attacking Barack Obama but simultaneously portraying herself as a victim.

It is a nifty political two-step.

She is a victim because a male-dominated press corps has counted her out, she says, and has lavished praise on Obama without submitting him to any real scrutiny.

At a Clinton rally in Westerville, Ohio, on Sunday, one woman carried a sign that read: "DON'T LET THE PRESS BOY-CRUSH PICK OUR PRESIDENT."

Time's Karen Tumulty noted: "Indeed, at Clinton's first event of the day, there was almost an anger at the idea that the pundits and the press have anointed a winner before the people have voted."

And Clinton told the crowd: "We're coming back. … We need someone in the White House again who is a fighter!"

Clinton used the "victim who battles back" theme effectively in New Hampshire, where she scored the upset that allowed her campaign to continue after being whacked by Obama in Iowa.

Some very bright commentators have written recently that Clinton should have dropped out before Tuesday's primaries in Texas, Ohio, Vermont and Rhode Island. I don't get this at all.

Quitting before you are defeated does not encourage people to work for you, vote for you or give money to you in the future. And Clinton has not yet been defeated.

Yes, she has to worry about 2012, when, if she does not get the nomination this time, she will either be up for reelection to the Senate or could run for president again. But someone who stands up and fights is the image she needs. She does not want the image of someone who cuts and runs when the going gets tough.

Nor do I think, as some do, that Bill Clinton's statement that she needs to win both Texas and Ohio to gain the nomination was (yet another) grievous tactical error.

The Clinton campaign had to serve notice that Tuesday is it. The campaign is facing elimination after 11 Obama victories in a row and with superdelegates swinging his way. Both Clintons had to motivate voters in Texas and Ohio by serving final notice. They had to tell them: Get up off the couch and vote now, or it's all over.

Even those voters who were not particularly passionate for Hillary but just wanted the campaign to go on needed to be told that they had to get out and vote for that to happen. Maybe the voters just wanted more excitement, or to find out what was in her tax returns, or to hear Obama fully explain his relationship with Tony Rezko. As Clinton would say: Whatever.

Clinton had to raise the stakes by raising the bar: It's today or bust.

And along with victimhood, Clinton has finally found a powerful theme, the same theme that George W. Bush used at his convention and in his reelection campaign in 2004: Vote for me or die.

With her "3 a.m. phone call" ad, she is saying exactly what Bush said: I will protect you and your children, and the other guy will not.

Yes, there is irony in a Democrat trying to getting the nomination by adopting a Republican tactic, but, hey, you know what? It worked back then, and Clinton is betting it will work now.

It is not a perfect theme for Clinton. She cannot point to any examples of actually having solved a national security crisis at 3 a.m. or any other time, but her argument is that she has the judgment and experience that Obama lacks to protect the nation.

She is throwing in "kitchen sink" stuff, too: She is hitting Obama for not being candid about NAFTA, and she is even making some odd (and unpleasant) statements on his religion.

On "60 Minutes" Sunday, when Steve Croft asked Clinton if she believed Obama was a Muslim, she replied: "No. No, there is nothing to base that on. As far as I know."

"As far as I know"? Doesn't that just continue a smear? (Obama said Sunday: "I pray to Jesus every night. I am a devout Christian.")

This is not appetizing stuff by Clinton. This is the stuff a candidate who is facing elimination does to hang on.

So can you be both a victim and a victimizer? Of course you can. In politics, anything is possible.

In an interview with ABC News last week, Clinton agreed that many women around the country feel sorry for her. "I think a lot of women project their own feelings in their lives on to me," Clinton said. "Everywhere I go, people say, 'Don't give up, don't give up, stay with this.'''

Clinton added: "There is something going on here."

On Monday, her chief spokesman, Howard Wolfson, said: "If people wake up Wednesday and the headlines read 'Clinton wins Ohio and Texas,' we have a whole new ballgame here."

We will. Now all she has to do is actually win.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


Comment on Roger Simon's column by clicking here.


Roger Simon Archives


© 2008, Creators Syndicate