May 24, 2013
May 22, 2013
They launched the 'Arab Spring' but now yearn for the good old days of a strongman
May 20, 2013
Richard A. Serrano: Is Meir Kahane's assassin now a changed man?
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
March 4, 2008
/ 27 Adar I 5768
At war with history
Debra J. Saunders
"Now, I have to say, when it came to making the most important foreign
policy decision of our generation, the decision to invade Iraq, Sen.
Clinton got it wrong," Barack Obama said Sunday in response to a Clinton
campaign ad that suggests only Hillary Clinton would be ready to answer
a late-night emergency phone call to the White House. "She didn't read
the National Intelligence Estimate. Jay Rockefeller (the present Senate
Intelligence Committee chairman who endorsed Obama) read it, but she
didn't read it.
"I don't know what all that experience got her, because I have enough
experience to know that if you have a National Intelligence Estimate and
the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee says, 'You should read
this, this is why I'm voting against the war,' that you should probably
read it. I don't know how much experience you need for that."
Obama is correct that Clinton failed to read the 90-page NIE report
before voting to authorize the use of U.S. military force in Iraq in
October 2002. But if you watched that clip, you likely would think that
Rockefeller read the NIE, then, as a consequence, voted against the war.
Wrong. The West Virginia Democrat read the NIE, then voted for the war.
Obama's campaign explains that Obama didn't get his facts mixed up. When
Obama referred to the chairman of Senate Intelligence, he was referring
to Bob Graham, the then-committee chairman who opposed the war.
CNN aired Obama's remarks more than once Monday without clarifying that
Rockefeller actually voted for the war. While the New York Times
reported on Rockefeller's pro-war vote, other news stories repeated the
Obama quote without setting the record straight.
It seems Clinton has a point when she complains about Obama getting
cushy treatment from the media. Because stories that didn't clarify
Rockefeller's vote leave the impression that a senator who read the NIE
would have voted against the war.
To the contrary, Rockefeller read the NIE and concluded, "There is
unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to
develop nuclear weapons" actually, the NIE language was less
conclusive and that Hussein's "existing biological and chemical
weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America."
Rockefeller also said in his statement before his war vote, "There has
been some debate over how 'imminent' a threat Iraq poses. I do believe
that Iraq poses an imminent threat, but I also believe that after Sept.
11, that question is increasingly outdated." Like much of Washington at
the time, Rockefeller lived in complete dread of the possibility that
U.S. intelligence was underestimating Baghdad's WMD capabilities, as it
had done before.
In a short-attention-span nation, many voters have forgotten the serious
deliberations that preceded the war. They forget that the NIE asserted
without reservation that Saddam Hussein had chemical and biological WMD.
They only know that some intelligence officials had doubts about Iraq's
nuclear capability and that the administration announced that President
Bush should not have included a sentence about Iraq's attempts to obtain
uranium in his 2003 State of the Union address. They use the above to
claim that Bush lied America into war even though Bush delivered that
speech three months after Congress voted to authorize the use of force
Clinton added to the Bush-lied pile-on when, undeterred by the fact that
then-CIA chief George Tenet was appointed by her husband, she wrote in
2005 that America went to war based on "false" as opposed to
tragically erroneous intelligence.
Now Clinton finds herself on the receiving end. Since Democrats won't
recognize any legitimacy to the WMD case, Clinton's pro-war vote must be
a sign that she was duped or she didn't do her homework.
The anti-war crowd needs to have a bogeyman and he can't be Saddam
Hussein, whose cooperation with U.N. inspectors would have prevented
this war. If the U.S. intelligence was wrong, it can't be because
Hussein successfully tricked the world into believing he had WMD, which
it seems, he no longer possessed. The culprit must be, to borrow from a
former first lady, "a vast right-wing conspiracy."
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.
Debra J. Saunders Archives
© 2007, Creators Syndicate
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Frank J. Gaffney
Victor Davis Hanson
A. Barton Hinkle
Judge A. Napolitano
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Debra J. Saunders
J. D. Crowe
Ask Doctor K