Home
In this issue
April 9, 2014

Jonathan Tobin: Why Did Kerry Lie About Israeli Blame?

Samuel G. Freedman: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Jessica Ivins: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Kim Giles: Asking for help is not weakness

Kathy Kristof and Barbara Hoch Marcus: 7 Great Growth Israeli Stocks

Matthew Mientka: How Beans, Peas, And Chickpeas Cleanse Bad Cholesterol and Lowers Risk of Heart Disease

Sabrina Bachai: 5 At-Home Treatments For Headaches

The Kosher Gourmet by Daniel Neman Have yourself a matzo ball: The secrets bubby never told you and recipes she could have never imagined

April 8, 2014

Lori Nawyn: At Your Wit's End and Back: Finding Peace

Susan B. Garland and Rachel L. Sheedy: Strategies Married Couples Can Use to Boost Benefits

David Muhlbaum: Smart Tax Deductions Non-Itemizers Can Claim

Jill Weisenberger, M.S., R.D.N., C.D.E : Before You Lose Your Mental Edge

Dana Dovey: Coffee Drinkers Rejoice! Your Cup Of Joe Can Prevent Death From Liver Disease

Chris Weller: Electric 'Thinking Cap' Puts Your Brain Power Into High Gear

The Kosher Gourmet by Marlene Parrish A gift of hazelnuts keeps giving --- for a variety of nutty recipes: Entree, side, soup, dessert

April 4, 2014

Rabbi David Gutterman: The Word for Nothing Means Everything

Charles Krauthammer: Kerry's folly, Chapter 3

Amy Peterson: A life of love: How to build lasting relationships with your children

John Ericson: Older Women: Save Your Heart, Prevent Stroke Don't Drink Diet

John Ericson: Why 50 million Americans will still have spring allergies after taking meds

Cameron Huddleston: Best and Worst Buys of April 2014

Stacy Rapacon: Great Mutual Funds for Young Investors

Sarah Boesveld: Teacher keeps promise to mail thousands of former students letters written by their past selves

The Kosher Gourmet by Sharon Thompson Anyone can make a salad, you say. But can they make a great salad? (SECRETS, TESTED TECHNIQUES + 4 RECIPES, INCLUDING DRESSINGS)

April 2, 2014

Paul Greenberg: Death and joy in the spring

Dan Barry: Should South Carolina Jews be forced to maintain this chimney built by Germans serving the Nazis?

Mayra Bitsko: Save me! An alien took over my child's personality

Frank Clayton: Get happy: 20 scientifically proven happiness activities

Susan Scutti: It's Genetic! Obesity and the 'Carb Breakdown' Gene

Lecia Bushak: Why Hand Sanitizer May Actually Harm Your Health

Stacy Rapacon: Great Funds You Can Own for $500 or Less

Cameron Huddleston: 7 Ways to Save on Home Decor

The Kosher Gourmet by Steve Petusevsky Exploring ingredients as edible-stuffed containers (TWO RECIPES + TIPS & TECHINQUES)

Jewish World Review Feb. 27, 2008 / 21 Adar I 5768

Ickes has new love for superdelegates

By Roger Simon


Printer Friendly Version

Email this article

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Harold Ickes sweats the details.


In 1973, while working on the New York mayoral campaign of Bronx Borough President Herman Badillo, Ickes bit a man on the leg in a tussle over what Ickes considered a bad sound system.


In 1992, when Ickes was running the Democratic convention for Bill Clinton, Ickes forced a guy to climb up into the rafters of Madison Square Garden with a large knife to cut the netting in case the balloons did not drop properly. The Secret Service nearly shot the guy.


Ickes also has worked in the campaigns of Eugene McCarthy, Ed Muskie, Morris Udall, Ted Kennedy, Walter Mondale and Jesse Jackson. But when Jackson was thinking about running against Bill Clinton in 1996, Ickes did everything he could to sabotage Jackson's efforts. (Ickes was successful.)


Times change, and candidates change. Today, Ickes is working for Hillary Clinton.


Ickes has served on the Democratic National Committee and on its powerful Rules and Bylaws Committee for years and is a consummate party insider. "Our party is fairly complicated," he said recently, which also shows that he has a gift for understatement.


Ickes believes, as do most analysts, that neither Hillary Clinton nor Barack Obama will get to the Democratic National Convention in Denver with enough pledged delegates won in primaries and caucuses to secure the nomination.


Which means that the superdelegates, who are party big shots, will have to choose the nominee.


"They are supposed to exercise leadership," Ickes said of the superdelegates Monday at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast with reporters. "They are not sheep."


But should they be kingmakers? (Or queenmakers?)


While superdelegates were originally conceived as a check on the ability of a dark horse candidate to run away with the nomination, the superdelegates have grown into a massive force.


About one out of every five delegates at the Democratic convention will be a superdelegate, and by my calculation, 56 percent of the superdelegates are members of the DNC, which lends a certain "smoke-filled room" aspect to the nominee selection process.


It was not always thus. In 1988, the Rules and Bylaws Committee stripped DNC members of their superdelegate status. Though the status was later restored, do you know who led the charge to kick DNC members out of the superdelegate pool?


Harold Ickes.


"Yes, I stripped them, and I was working for Jesse Jackson at the time and we thought automatic [i.e., super] delegates represented too much of an institutional interest and they didn't recognize the qualities of someone like him," Ickes told me in a phone interview a few days ago.


Some might now argue that superdelegates still represent an institutional interest and don't recognize the qualities of someone like Barack Obama. But there has been some momentum toward Obama among the superdelegates recently.


The fact that superdelegates will choose the nominee will not be a problem as long as the superdelegates end up voting for the candidate who won the most pledged delegates in the primaries and caucuses. But will they?


I asked Ickes if he actually believes superdelegates would vote for Clinton if Obama is leading in pledged delegates heading into the convention.


"I think it depends upon the amount by which he leads," Ickes said. "There is a degree here. If he were to lead by one pledged delegate — I don't want to be pinned down to a number — there would be a difference than if he were leading by 500."


In other words, Ickes believes that if Obama has only a very narrow lead, Clinton could get away with using the superdelegates to overturn that lead.


But I wonder. It seems to me that a huge battle and a badly divided party would result, especially if black voters felt that their party had betrayed them by using the votes of big shots to replace the will of the people.


"There will be some hurt feelings initially," Ickes said. "But in a very tight election, Barack Obama will swing in behind Hillary Clinton and black people will vote for her and she will be able to bring in Hispanic voters also."


Nobody has ever accused Harold Ickes of being a Pollyanna, but I think that is a very optimistic view of things.


"Look, I am filled with pride when I look at Obama," Ickes said. "He is an extraordinary candidate. But so is Hillary Clinton, and when push comes to shove, our obligation is to nominate the candidate with the best chances in the fall. That is Hillary Clinton."

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


Comment on Roger Simon's column by clicking here.


Roger Simon Archives


© 2008, Creators Syndicate