Home
In this issue
April 9, 2014

Jonathan Tobin: Why Did Kerry Lie About Israeli Blame?

Samuel G. Freedman: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Jessica Ivins: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Kim Giles: Asking for help is not weakness

Kathy Kristof and Barbara Hoch Marcus: 7 Great Growth Israeli Stocks

Matthew Mientka: How Beans, Peas, And Chickpeas Cleanse Bad Cholesterol and Lowers Risk of Heart Disease

Sabrina Bachai: 5 At-Home Treatments For Headaches

The Kosher Gourmet by Daniel Neman Have yourself a matzo ball: The secrets bubby never told you and recipes she could have never imagined

April 8, 2014

Lori Nawyn: At Your Wit's End and Back: Finding Peace

Susan B. Garland and Rachel L. Sheedy: Strategies Married Couples Can Use to Boost Benefits

David Muhlbaum: Smart Tax Deductions Non-Itemizers Can Claim

Jill Weisenberger, M.S., R.D.N., C.D.E : Before You Lose Your Mental Edge

Dana Dovey: Coffee Drinkers Rejoice! Your Cup Of Joe Can Prevent Death From Liver Disease

Chris Weller: Electric 'Thinking Cap' Puts Your Brain Power Into High Gear

The Kosher Gourmet by Marlene Parrish A gift of hazelnuts keeps giving --- for a variety of nutty recipes: Entree, side, soup, dessert

April 4, 2014

Rabbi David Gutterman: The Word for Nothing Means Everything

Charles Krauthammer: Kerry's folly, Chapter 3

Amy Peterson: A life of love: How to build lasting relationships with your children

John Ericson: Older Women: Save Your Heart, Prevent Stroke Don't Drink Diet

John Ericson: Why 50 million Americans will still have spring allergies after taking meds

Cameron Huddleston: Best and Worst Buys of April 2014

Stacy Rapacon: Great Mutual Funds for Young Investors

Sarah Boesveld: Teacher keeps promise to mail thousands of former students letters written by their past selves

The Kosher Gourmet by Sharon Thompson Anyone can make a salad, you say. But can they make a great salad? (SECRETS, TESTED TECHNIQUES + 4 RECIPES, INCLUDING DRESSINGS)

April 2, 2014

Paul Greenberg: Death and joy in the spring

Dan Barry: Should South Carolina Jews be forced to maintain this chimney built by Germans serving the Nazis?

Mayra Bitsko: Save me! An alien took over my child's personality

Frank Clayton: Get happy: 20 scientifically proven happiness activities

Susan Scutti: It's Genetic! Obesity and the 'Carb Breakdown' Gene

Lecia Bushak: Why Hand Sanitizer May Actually Harm Your Health

Stacy Rapacon: Great Funds You Can Own for $500 or Less

Cameron Huddleston: 7 Ways to Save on Home Decor

The Kosher Gourmet by Steve Petusevsky Exploring ingredients as edible-stuffed containers (TWO RECIPES + TIPS & TECHINQUES)

Jewish World Review Feb. 12, 2007 / 24 Shevat, 5767

All this cash — and one of them will lose!

By Mitch Albom


Printer Friendly Version
Email this article

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Half a billion dollars.


That's what the Republican and Democratic nominees each will likely spend on the 2008 presidential election.


Half a billion dollars.


This figure came to light with the recent news that presidential wannabes Hillary Rodham Clinton and Mitt Romney — and soon, likely, John McCain — already were rejecting public financing in favor of private fundraising. In other words, keep your money, America, we'll raise our own.


Half a billion dollars?


Ever since Watergate shook the nation in the 1970s, we've had a system in which major candidates can get the same amount of public money to run for president, as long as they promise not to raise or use private contributions. This money — around $122 million a candidate — is raised by citizens checking a box on their tax returns designating $3 to the election fund.


Now, $122 million should be enough to run a campaign. In fact, it seems downright generous of us taxpayers. And if every candidate has the same ceiling, it's at least a level playing field. Like we used to do in high school. Remember? If you ran for class president, you were entitled to one poster and one flyer. Same as everyone else. You couldn't outdo your rivals by spending Mom and Dad's money and papering the school with paraphernalia.


One poster. One flyer.


The rest was up to you.


Now, we shouldn't be surprised that high school makes more sense than the federal government. Most things make more sense than the federal government.


But this cost-of-election explosion has such obvious ramifications, you wonder why people aren't screaming.


Let's face it: If it takes $500 million to run for president, you can forget the little guy. You can forget a 2008 "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington."


What $500 million means is that only the richest, most connected and most pliable people will have a chance at ever leading this nation. Notice I didn't use the words "intelligent," "moral" or "inspirational." Those things are nice. But they don't get you $500 million.


What gets you $500 million is the perception that you will be favorable, if elected, to the people who gave it to you. Those lucky folks capable of raising such money — lobbyists, for example, who can "bundle" contributions into seven-figure donations — aren't doing it for fun. They're doing it to protect their interests. And they will expect, if the candidate wins, to get their quid pro quo.


In essence, at these prices, a president is bought and paid for before he or she ever puts a hand on the Bible.


What I don't understand is why, if we raise public money for presidential elections, we don't insist that all candidates use it.


Make everyone spend the same on ads and campaigning. Let no one have a penny more than the other guy. Then it's up to the candidate to get out there, to speak, to state a position, to debate — instead of depending on slickly crafted commercials to shape his or her image.


But this is not how it works. Candidates such as Clinton will be able to dwarf the opposition with radio and TV ads, billboards, travel — giving them a huge advantage.


Yet the most common argument for keeping this unfair system in place?


Free speech. That's right. People argue that they ought to be allowed to give their money wherever they want, to bundle it however they can, because to deny this is to deny free speech.


I don't know. An individual can give $4,200 to a presidential candidate next year (for the primaries and the general election). That's not exactly "free" speech. In fact, $4,200 represents about 10 percent of the median annual income for an American family.


Poor people can't give that much. Middle class can't. Rich people can. So tell me again how this is about free speech and not ensuring special interests get their candidates in.


Half a billion dollars. A billion for two parties. You look at the current candidates. You look at our current leader. And you have to wonder if presidential campaigns aren't the single biggest blowing of money in the world.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

MITCH'S LATEST
"For One More Day"  

"For One More Day" is the story of a mother and a son, and a relationship that covers a lifetime and beyond. It explores the question: What would you do if you could spend one more day with a lost loved one? Sales help fund JWR.



Comment on Mitch's column by clicking here.



Mitch's Archives


© 2007, THE DETROIT FREE PRESS DISTRIBUTED BY TMS, INC.

Columnists

Toons

Lifestyles