|
|
|
Jewish World Review Feb. 16, 2005 / 7 Adar I, 5765 Insufficiently draconian cuts By Tony Blankley
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Washington has started in on its yearly ferocious battle over
the budget. Spendthrifts and budget hawks will be thrilling the public with
daring plastic swordplay. Terrible deprecations will be called down upon the
heartless budget hawks for their indifference to the human suffering their
proposed cuts will bring into being.
The spendthrifts, in their turn, will be accused of indulging in
levels of spending that constitute Babylonian depravity, which will bankrupt
the public fisc not only for ourselves, but for our children and
grandchildren. Have they no sense of responsibility! Such profligacy will
earn them posthumous curses from their children for the sundered public
treasury we will have left them.
Already the Washington Post has invoked the memory of the 7th
century B.C. Athenian politician Draco, calling President Bush's budget cuts
"draconian." Actually, the Washington Post writer may not have known how
canny he was in mentioning Draco, one of my favorite characters from the
misty past.
The Athenian people had called on Draco to write down the laws,
because they were tired of the aristocrats pronouncing arbitrary oral rules.
It turned out that the old unwritten laws — at least as researched and
written down by Draco — were quite tough. In fact, the penalty for almost
all offenses was the death sentence.
This was fine with Draco. As Plutarch described it: "And Draco
himself, they say, being asked why he made death the penalty for most
offenses, replied that in his opinion, the lesser ones deserved it, and for
the greater ones no heavier sentence could be found."
Oh, and for the mistake of going in debt, under Draco's laws,
debtors were sold into slavery (except for the upper classes, wouldn't you
know).
If only President Bush's cuts were draconian. Unfortunately,
like every effort at controlling federal spending in the last quarter
century (except for the House Republican effort of fiscal 1995-1996),
President Bush's cuts, even if they are fully enacted, won't make any
measurable difference to the level of federal debt for our children. He is
proposing to reduce non-military, non-entitlement spending of about $400
billion by about $20 billion.
And he will have hell to pay from an outraged public if he gets
even that, because federal spending programs are lovingly and carefully
named to induce maximum, if ignorant, public support: children's hot
lunches, Head Start, etc. Often more effort goes into naming a spending
program than writing it. If the name is sufficiently adorable, no politician
will have the nerve to cut it.
Even President Eisenhower got into the name game back in the
1950s when he titled both his road building and federal aid to education
bills "National Defense" programs. Who would deny General Ike a national
defense program? And for the purposes of the news cycle, if a politician has
voted to cut hot lunches for poor children — well, what else does an angry
public need to know?
Here is what they need to know: Two sentences from the 2004
Annual Report of the Social Security and Medicare Board of Trustees explains
why every word and every cut being talked about this season in Washington
won't make any appreciable difference
"The annual cost of Social Security benefits represents 4.3
percent of Gross Domestic Product today and is projected to rise to 6.6
percent of GDP in 2078 ... Medicare's annual costs are currently 2.7 percent
of GDP ... and will reach almost 14 percent of GDP in 2078."
In other words, today, those two programs alone account for the
use of about 7 percent of all goods and service in the United States ($900
billion out of a GDP of about $12 trillion), which is about 36 percent of
the federal budget of $2.5 trillion.
By the time today's toddlers are retiring, those two programs
will need 20 percent of America's total domestic economic output, which, if
the federal budget remains in the same proportion with our GDP, would be 100
percent (not the current 36 percent) of the federal budget. In other words,
those two programs, alone, would take up the entire federal budget. There
would be nothing for Education, Medicaid, Defense, CIA, Agriculture, FBI,
other pensions and entitlements. Nothing for all the rest of the federal
government and budget.
And it could well be worse than that. As medical science
advances to ever more wonderful capabilities, its costs go up. Currently,
they are going up at over 10 percent a year — for all medical services in
both public and private sectors. Throw in the impending, if expensive,
miracles of genetic medicine, and the sky's the limit.
Certainly President Bush's cuts should be passed. They should be
doubled or tripled and then passed — but they won't be, because the
politicians of both parties are but the willing slaves to a public that
collectively wants more than it can produce.
Someday, Draco's iron law of slavery for debtors will be brought
down on our children's heads. Of course, we won't be around to hear their
curses. But we may be sweating, nonetheless.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many Washington and the media consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
© 2005, Creators Syndicate | ||||||||||
