Jewish World Review Feb. 12, 2003 / 10 Adar I, 5763

Dr. Michael A. Glueck

The Medicine Men
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Hawk, Dove or Groundhog: Diagnosis Critical List; Prognosis Uncertain


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | As the days of truth and perhaps survival approach it's time to decide whether you are a Hawknik, Dovenik or Groundhognik. Talk is cheap! Decision is expensive! While the groundhog in Pennsylvania sees his shadow; the one in Ohio does not. Unlike the Groundhog we do not have the luxury of indecision and procrastination!

As war approaches, we know - we hear it every day - that America possesses the most powerful military in history. This is true. But only a few of us understand the nature and vulnerabilities of this force. In part, this is because we're a nation of military illiterates. No one has been drafted in thirty years; those who serve no longer permeate our culture. We learn, or think we learn, about our forces from Hollywood or (even worse) from media snippets. But the deeper reason is that the American military is so utterly different from anything that has gone before, that it's not easily understood.

What follows is not an argument for or against war with Iraq or anybody else. It is an affirmation of Sun Tzu's ancient dictum that, if you want to succeed in war, you must know yourself as well as the enemy.

This is us.

Our military is unique. No one has, no one can, assemble the array of weapons we possess. To name a few:

Stealth aircraft.

A dozen large-deck aircraft carriers.

Several dozen nuclear attack submarines; a couple hundred surface combatants.

The world's largest and most versatile Marine Corps.

Tens of thousands of precision-guided weapons, from cruise missiles to "smart bombs" and shoulder-launched items.

The world's finest tanks, fighter-bombers, aerial refuelers, unmanned aircraft, etc. etc.

But our advantage lies not in quantity, nor even in quality, per se. Our strength lies in the structure as a whole. For our military is a complex "system of systems," tied together by and utterly dependent upon communications, satellites, computers, "real time and near real time intelligence," as well as total freedom of the skies and the seas.

And therein lies the first major problem. The more complex the system, the greater its vulnerability to partial, cascading, and catastrophic failure. This says nothing about the courage or the competence of the people. It's simply a fact of life. The more intricate and interdependent the system, the greater the chance of eventual breakdown.

Especially if you're facing an adversary who, knowing he can't defeat you force-on-force, disperses and goes for your "critical nodes."

A second problem is that much of the damage wrought by Bill Clinton has not been repaired. Some cannot be. After a decade of boring holes in the skies over Iraq and the Balkans, our tactical aircraft (designed in the 60s) are wearing out. Parts are so scarce that the Pentagon routinely scrounges the Net for items no longer manufactured. Our fleet stands at 301 ships and dropping. The reserves and National Guard are also weary, as units that served in the Balkans and elsewhere endure or expect yet another long mobilization. This is especially true for technical specialists - the "High Demand/Low Density" people who hold the system together - and for Guard units who've also answered state emergencies. And face it, a ship that's been on patrol for six months carries a lot of tired sailors as well as a long list of shore maintenance requirements.

Which leads to the third problem. We're overextended. America currently maintains a military presence in about 110 countries. Our obligations are growing as the war on terrorism takes us into central Asia for the first time (One Pentagon official recently predicted we'll be there for fifty years), deeper into Latin America, and once again into the Philippines and southeast Asia.

And therein lies the fourth, and potentially most dangerous, dilemma. For very good military reasons, we're profoundly "casualty-averse." Our highly skilled people, from commandos to computer techs, cannot be easily replaced. Nor can their equipment. When B-2 bombers cost eight hundred million a copy, when aircraft carriers cost billions, when even "expendable" items such as Predator drones and Tomahawk cruises missiles cost hundreds of thousands . . . and when you've got much of the planet against you . . . it's prudent to be prudent.

And it's prudent to remember that, should Saddam inflict significant casualties on the United States, a few thousand body bags, a couple ships sunk, it would show the world that America can be hurt militarily. Not defeated, but hurt. And how we react to that hurt would also tell the world much about us.

Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.




Michael Arnold Glueck, M.D., is a multiple award winning writer who comments on medical- legal issues. Together with Robert J. Cihak, M.D., past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, they write the "Medicine Men" column. Comment by clicking here.

Up

02/07/03: How about tax cuts for the "rich" and "poor"?
01/31/03: AIDS Bug Chasers
01/24/03: Libertarian moment or movement?
01/17/03: It's not just 'sue the docs' anymore
01/03/03: A pox on the critics; diagnosis sour grapes
01/03/03: If protesting is good for your health; then at least let's root for the home team
12/20/02: Obesidemic (obesity epidemic) or not?
12/20/02: Time for voluntary informed smallpox vaccinations
12/13/02: The real reason the state opposes homeschooling?
12/06/02: Conscience of a former conservative: Portrait of a political metamorphosis
11/27/02: Thanksgiving dinner hazard?
11/22/02: Time to think outside the box and inside the nucleus
11/15/02: The military should be protected from abusive environmental laws in times of war
11/11/02: Does Kyoto Treaty pose more harm than global warming?
10/31/02: Deep thoughts on Baseball, the World Series and Life: How about them Anaheim Angels?
10/23/02: "Pediatric rule" guinea pigs
10/23/02: Once the World Series ends, we need to create a Donnie Moore Day of Remembrance: Sports and mental health
10/18/02: Congress to senior patients: Do as we say not as we do for ourselves
10/11/02: Using pollution "scare labeling" to political advantage
10/04/02: The Great Asbestos Heist: Did Litigation and Junk Medical Science Helped Bring Down the World Trade Center?
09/27/02: The imminent rise of civic feminism: A far healthier national alternative in war and peace
09/20/02: A Ray A Day" to replace the daily apple?
09/13/02: Beware of celebrities hawking drugs
09/06/02: Avoid 9/11 overdose: Give blood to begin "September of Service," SOS
08/28/02: From Doubleday to strikeday: Baseball's collective anxiety attack
08/23/02: Should she or shouldn't she?: An alternative view on treating menopause with HRT
08/16/02: Cooking up defenses against germ warfare
08/02/02: Medicine, crime and canines
07/26/02: Lies, pathologic lies and the Palestinians
07/19/02: Medicare Drug Follies as in "now you see it, now you don't"
07/12/02: Anti-Profiling: A New Medically False Belief System
07/08/02: Don't procrastinate, vaccinate!
06/28/02: The scientific advances on the safe and effective deployment of DDT are being ignored, or denied. Why?
06/21/02: Sex and the system: In seeking healthcare men are different from women
06/14/02: The FDA, drug companies and life-saving drugs: Who's the fox and who's the hen now?
06/07/02: Medical Privacy Lost: A hippo on the healthcare back!
05/24/02: To clean up America's game: A (soggy) ground rule
05/10/02: Free speech is good medicine
05/03/02: Medicine's Vietnam
04/26/02: Attack on alternative medicine could lead to alternative lawsuits
04/12/02: Insure the 'crazies'?
04/09/02: No Time for Litmus Tests: In War We Need a Surgeon General and NIH, CDC, and FDA Directors
04/02/02: The scoop on soot: A dirty rotten shame?
03/22/02: Too many beautiful minds to waste: The first annual Caduceus Movie
03/15/02: Terror and transformation: Defense essential for health & state of mind
03/08/02: Diagnosis: Delusional
03/06/02: The great matzah famine
03/01/02: Is new Hippocratic Oath hypocritical?
02/15/02: Why the recent moaning about cloning?
02/08/02: Searching for Dr. Strangelove
01/15/02: Score one for the value of human life
01/04/02: Medical-legal-financial wake-up call
12/28/01: Who's afraid of a 'dirty bomb'?
12/21/01: End of medicine?
12/14/01: More heroes: Docs deserve a little credit after 9/11
11/16/01: Do we need 'Super Smallpox Saturdays'?
11/09/01: Why the post-9-11 health care debate will never be the same
11/01/01: Common sense good for our mental health
10/26/01: Your right to medical privacy --- even in terror time
10/12/01: Failed immigration policy ultimately bad for nation's mental health: Enemy within leads to epidemic of jumpy nerves
09/28/01: Can legal leopards change their spots: A treat instead of a trick
09/21/01: Civil defense again a civic duty
08/30/01: Shut down this government CAFE
08/23/01: School Bells or Jail Cells?
08/15/01: Time to take coaches to the woodshed
08/10/01: Blood, Guts & Glory: The Stem of the Stem Cell controversy

© 2002