Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Dec. 19, 2002 / 14 Teves, 5763

Bill Schneider

William
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Why Gore dropped out --- he never grasped one of politics' most important lessons

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Why did Al Gore decide not to run? He undoubtedly found out that a lot of Democratic activists and contributors didn't want to hear from him this time around. They think he blew it in 2000.

Gore was also suffering from the vice presidential problem. Being vice president is a great way to get your party's nomination. That's because the outstanding quality in a vice president is loyalty. Partisans control the nominating process, and they value -- and reward -- party loyalty.

But once a vice president is nominated, he discovers that most voters outside the ranks of the party faithful do not value loyalty As Richard Nixon discovered in 1960, and Hubert Humphrey discovered in 1968, and Walter Mondale discovered in 1984, and Al Gore discovered in 2000, voters don't want a President who's "loyal.'' They want a President who's his own man.

The only exception in 150 years: George Bush in 1988. Being Ronald Reagan's man turned out to be a pretty good image.

Nixon eventually did get elected, in 1968. But he had to wait eight years to "recover'' from being vice president. By 2008, Gore, too, may lose the vice presidential stigma. "I make this decision in the full knowledge and awareness that if I don't run this time . . . that's probably the last opportunity I'll ever have to run for President,'' Gore told CBS "60 Minutes,'' adding "Don't know that for sure, but probably it is.'' That's not quite as definitive as Nixon saying, "You won't have Dick Nixon to kick around any more'' after losing the race for governor of California in 1962.

Gore would have been the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination.

Prof. William Mayer, a political scientist at Northeastern University, has studied every contested nomination in both parties since 1980. Here's what he finds: "In seven of the ten cases . . . the nominee-to-be had opened up a sizeable lead over every other eventual candidate by, at the latest, one month after the preceding midterm election -- more than a year, in other words, before the start of the actual delegate selection activities.'' Which means, at this very point in the nominating cycle.

After the 1978 midterm, Ronald Reagan was the frontrunner for the 1980 GOP nomination. After the 1982 midterm, Walter Mondale led the field for 1984 Just after the 1994 midterm, Bob Dole was the Republican favorite for 1996. And right after the 1998 midterm, Al Gore led the Democratic field for 2000.

Same thing for George Bush the Elder going into the 1988 and 1992 Republican contests. And for George Bush the Younger going into 2000. In every case, whoever led the polls after the midterm ended up winning the nomination.

There were a few exceptions. But each of them was, well, exceptional. After the 1978 midterm, Sen. Edward Kennedy -- not President Jimmy Carter -- was the frontrunner for the 1980 Democratic nomination. But just before the first primaries, the hostage crisis in Iran put President Carter back in the lead. After the 1986 midterm, Gary Hart led the Democratic field for 1988 Hart proceeded to self-destruct. After the 1990 midterm, Mario Cuomo was the Democratic frontrunner, followed by Jesse Jackson. But neither of them ran in 1992.

It's not unusual for a candidate to come out of nowhere and pull off a surprise primary victory -- like Gary Hart in 1984, and Pat Buchanan in 1996, and John McCain in 2000. Didn't they gain what George Bush called "the Big Mo'' after he beat Ronald Reagan in Iowa in 1980? Yes, each of those candidates got momentum. But none of them got the nomination. As Mayer said in an interview, "I characterize momentum as a bit like a roller coaster ride. It provides a lot of excitement. But in the end, it pretty much takes you back to where you started.''

Mayer coined the term, "the invisible primary'' -- the period from the midterm election to the Iowa caucuses, when candidates struggle for money and attention before a single vote is cast. Does the invisible primary matter? You bet it does. Because nine out of ten times, whoever wins the invisible primary becomes the nominee.

Winning the invisible primary means two things: raising the most money, and becoming the frontrunner in the polls. Here are Mayer's findings:

  • "If one focuses on the last poll taken before the start of delegate selection activities -- meaning, in most years, in the last poll before the Iowa caucuses -- the candidate leading in that poll went on to win the nomination'' in nine out of ten contests. The exception: Gary Hart was the Democratic frontrunner just before the 1988 Iowa caucuses.

  • "The leading money-raiser in the pre-primary campaign -- more precisely, the candidate who had raised the largest amount of money by December 31 of the year before the election -- went on to win the nomination'' nine out of ten times. The exception: John Connally had raised more money than Ronald Reagan by December 31, 1979.

Gore's decision not to run means the invisible primary becomes a real race -- a wide-open struggle to see who can raise the most money and move to the top of the polls by this time next year. "What it does is make sure there's no frontrunner,'' Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, the first Democrat to get into the race this year, said. With no frontrunner, the invisible primary of 2003 will count more than ever.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


To comment on JWR contributor William Schneider's column, please click here.


12/12/02: The emerging 'tough Democrat'?
12/06/02: Hispanic voting surprises
11/08/02: "President select" no longer: What have the Dems learned?
10/31/02: Can a party without a message or a messenger still win?
10/24/02: Fright Night may come twice this year!
09/24/02: The politically loaded question: "Why now?''
09/19/02: Pundits in the crosswinds
09/10/02: Has Bush lost his momentum?
09/04/02: Bush's European problem
08/13/02: Overdosing on prescription drug promises
08/06/02: The Dems' secret weapon
08/01/02: Time for prez to let Cheney go
07/30/02: GOPers, feeling scared, get realistic
07/18/02: Soccer Moms, say hello to NASCAR Dads
07/11/02: Israel via Alabama
06/20/02: Does the solution fit the problem?
06/13/02: Triggering unintended consequences
06/11/02: Democracy won, the president is saying to our enemies. You got a problem with that?
06/06/02: White House warnings were effective tactical move
05/23/02: Giving the Dems an education on education
05/16/02: Power to the swing voters
04/23/02: The secret formula
04/09/02: Politics Remain Stalemated
03/31/02: Values and gas mileage?
03/25/02: Truly oppressed minorities
03/14/02: Reciprocal hostility
03/07/02: Bush's prudence
02/28/02: Is the 'clash of civilizations' becoming a political reality?
02/28/02: 'Cowboy' or not, Bush has the 'axis of evil' running scared
02/20/02: Could it be that the era of Big Government really is over?
01/31/02: 'Daddy issues' grab center stage
01/15/02: And, they're off
01/09/02: Three 'War Stars' are born
01/04/02: California cluelessness?
12/17/01: Congress' life or death issue
11/27/01: Our reinvigorated spendthrift Congress
11/27/01: Out of War, Peace?
11/14/01: The other war --- the one for public opinion
11/09/01: The mayor of New Yawk and the King of the World
11/07/01: An insurance policy on America
11/02/01: A nation of defiant optimists
10/30/01: Has Bush has flip-flopped on 'nation-building'?
10/23/01: The new political world
10/16/01: The return of big government
10/08/01: On political war
10/01/01: The "born-again" president
09/25/01: Making America squirm
09/14/01: The American spirit will not wane
09/10/01: What Dubya knows about the budget
08/13/01: Japan becomes the latest country to see its politics become personalized
08/09/01: Bush backers out to remake prez yet again
07/30/01: Will the GOP's mandate of 1994 finally runs out?
07/23/01: Both political parties are full of ....
07/16/01: Empowered moderate Republicans
07/09/01: As goes New Jersey, so goes the nation?
07/02/01: Dubya: Like father, like son?
06/15/01: The new soccer moms
06/05/01: Deals or deadlock?
05/29/01: The War Between the States is heating up again
05/21/01: The answer is men
05/10/01: Bush v. Carter?

Up

© 2002, William Schneider